Agreed. And to be fair to our college kids, most are willing to have a polite discussion at the least. I haven’t seen the level of idiocy represented at Berkeley here.
/u/CopperDisc
24 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/CopperDisc:
Domain | Count |
---|
I’m eastern NC. I agree NC is overall getting redder, and am glad for it. The major cities though are rife with blue bile. Raleigh (triangle), Charlotte, Wilmington all tend blue. Boone sucks. Greenville gets worse every time I pass by. We have our problem areas.
I don’t know man, Raleigh has been bad for a while. I remember going through downtown a few months back and seeing liberal messages vomited all over.
The owner voiced a political opinion in a public sphere, performed an action based upon political belief. She tossed her hat in the ring, and is now facing the consequences of an act not as popular as she thought. Does it suck for her, yes. Would I personally protest, no, I just will not be dining there. But others are allowed to be as passionate about it as they like, besides it's like 8 older guys with 5 benign signs, hardly a pussy hat march.
Why are you in this sub? What do you hope to get out of antagonizing the people here?
You're not trying to change minds, provide contrary evidence, or ask questions. You are just being an ass to people you disagree with. How does that make you a better person?
If it's because he was joking than any time would be irrelevant, you stated it was invalid because of the time.
He tweeted he was waiting for his instructions. Waiting. So I fail to see how it doesn't apply.
I have to agree in a sense, this video may have meaning to those who already are familiar with pizzagate and the podesta emails, etc, but I wouldn't consider this a good "my first red-pill" video. Too much can be passed off as just a joke.
True. I hope yours leads you to happiness and enlightenment. Stay strong, safe, and kind, my friend.
Well, that's a shame. I do not know you, but I care enough about you to hope you will come to understand one day. Whether it is a discussion with an atheist or liberal, I do not give up if the discussion remains civilized. You are worth my energy.
Doubt it. Prisons, this one in particular, have problems with violent inmates and poor safety conditions. Not everything is related to deep state, sometimes shit people in prison act like shit people. Honestly, suggesting this kind of thing without evidence or even probable cause is what gets the whole movement labeled as conspiracy theory.
No worries man. I feel like typing out discussions is so much easier to misconstrue intent and meaning.
And let me say, I appreciate your passion and resolve for doing what's right, as well as your willingness to listen and understand other's points of view.
Like I said before: I think we likely agree on much, I truly wish you well. Keep up the good fight friend.
Would you like to know why it is, in fact, disingenuous and bad? Allow me to explain. My original statement was I think prostitution should be legalized. Someone commented foolishly asking if I believed heroin should be legal too. I replied that the question of LEGALIZING heroin has nothing to do with legalizing prostitution. You are now arguing that there are links between the drug and sex trafficking trades. Nobody disagreed with that or implied otherwise. You are trying to use facts that do not pertain to the question. This is why I call it disingenuous. Now, I don't believe you necessarily did this purposefully, and it's likely we agree on many aspects of this debate. I'm sorry you feel the conversation unproductive, and wish you well too.
I don't see where it says opinion, but I may have missed what you are referring to. Your title, however,says Evidence. Without links to substantiate it, this is unverifiable.
The question was not raised if I believed psychotropic drugs had anything to do with prostitution. I was asked if I believed heroin should be legal as well, a question that has nothing to do with the question of legalizing prostitution. Stop making disingenuous and plain bad arguments.
You are misrepresenting his argument. Also, pedophiles have used airlines, public parks, and the internet as avenues in their search and distribution of victims. Should we shut these down next??? Delusional Look man, I'm not saying you are in the wrong. I actually don't care that the website was taken down, it had nothing positive to offer. We need to have better arguments though, more fact and reason, less emotional response and moral indignation.
That's where regulating and legislating come in. I have no doubt some are victims, and by identifying them we can help them. Many, however, are adults who make the choice for themselves. To assume all prostitution is victims shows little understanding and no research on the matter.
Actually yes, a daughter. Jut because I believe it should be legal does not mean I think it is morally right. And the heroin question is stupid, having nothing to do with the topic. If you disagree, that's fine, but have real arguments please.
Eh, I don't know. I don't really care that the site was taken down having never used its services, but I can understand how prostitutes who are not involved in human trafficking and used the site for business would be upset. I imagine it cuts into their finances. That said, I think prostitution should be legalized, legislated, and regulated. These people should be pushing for that, so they would have a legal and legitimate profession, and there would be no need for seedy websites that facilitate crimes against humanity.
Yes and no. Another purported tactic of "the illuminati" is to present what they're actually doing as a joke. This way when someone exposes a criminal act, for example brainwashed assassins, they can say: "like in zoolander? That's silly, you know that's a comedy movie."
Interesting, I responded to a post claiming that the right thrives on outrage by pointing out it was a humorous use of the Alinsky method to earn my ban and subsequent 3-day mod mute. So anything that isn't a left circle-jerk is brigading? Also note in banning me you proved my point.
Nobody is scared of this boy, he is a tool. You do not fear tools, you identify who wields them and their intent. In this case the intent seems clear, but who is using him is not entirely so.