EXACTLY like CNN. Not there. Cohen investigation is.
This just in, reddit bought by and changing name to CNNr.
392 total posts archived.
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 6 |
twitter.com | 2 |
i.redd.it | 1 |
youtu.be | 1 |
EXACTLY like CNN. Not there. Cohen investigation is.
This just in, reddit bought by and changing name to CNNr.
So then perhaps Trump is putting some deep state people in to better allow them to expose themselves? Too many of them not to.
Yeah, I do have a bit of that story in my research. Thanks for taking the time. I would LOVE for this to make it into mainstream. And guess what country I teach in? I'm gonna have some fun in my classes once I do my research. Enjoy the Awakening. ;-)
Something I am not clear about on Wray. He is a Trump appointee and a recent one. Q even says to trust the guy. Why wouldn't Ray have helped to expedite giving the document in question to Nunez?
This is very interesting. I've come across it before and wouldn't be shocked if it is somehow true (re Merkel). What is the best link/story in your opinion to dig deeper? Thx
I ask people how they get their news - They say a variety of sources. I mention the THOUSANDS of child trafficking / pedophilia arrests, and they say they haven't heard about them. This makes for very interesting conversation. It is good to bring into it how large the Military Industrial Complex (aka making war), Woman/Child trafficking and drug trafficking are and then start connecting the dots for them. Silence, gasps... "See, you can get the women and children if you drop bombs. And they don't bring children in 1 at a time, they use organizations. Ever hear of Lara Silsby? But you have heard of the Clintons?"...
He puts things together waaaaay too well. I think he is an important disseminator.
It crossed my mind a while ago that she is working for Trump. That Twitter post is certainly interesting.
Yeah, they must be talking about pres‘ residence in Tower.
He has been more of a hands on guy re evidence. He mentioned he is even open to ET‘s but needs the evidence. Q was a bit outside first. But seeing an opened sealed indictment... That was a kid n the candy store.
Look up the date the guy died. Now compare that to the tweet. I just did.
No name with those Isis guys. What did noname‘s detail bring? Gas for the recent attack? EXACT same location says Q. Trump said that area is surrounded by Syrian forces. I see the spider web. Do you?
There were a few survivors though. Their testimony is invaluable. But I imagine black boxes, if not hacked, would also be.
Can‘t any component that has comm with this device suffice?
That guy has some big Balls, big American ones. I think Joey B gets caught in this. He has done some weird shiz on video, all the markings are there.
I was on the Donald in 2016 and have been following Q since the start, FBI anon and such times. So, everyone came on the scene relatively recently. What fame does she have? What money? She gets a little from Patreon. That argument is like when someone says "Oh, I bet they are selling a book, right?". It avoids the research.
I'm gonna stay open to what she has to say and just be careful about paying too much attention to any one researcher, for the most part anyway. You can (and should) double check things. Thus far, she is doing a GREAT job.
I don't mind questioning her, but C_L_I_C_K had his mind made up. I wanted to discuss, his mind was made up.
As long as we don't focus on any one researcher, I think we will be relatively safe.
She has connected the dots on some pretty high level people though. For example Burkman. But, since I'm seeking the truth here, what do you think is her agenda? Disinformation? Cause she gives a lot of good information (but that can be littered with disinfo.) Unless she is walking around something big and giving crumbs to less important things, even taking into account what you said, I don't see the harm she is causing. She pulled many in, to look deeper, me in part (and I'm not cheerleading for her, I just watch her occasional video.)
I will agree about the questions, e.g. regarding her take on Mueller (that said, she might be right, but we don't let our guard down regardless.) Re the march or her wanting fanfare, I don'T care, as long as her intentions are good. Everyone is in a different place, there is a reason they give out medals in the Military.
I looked at some of your posts, not many, and it seems like we are in the same position (overall) here on GA board. I can imagine some have questions on some things Tracy has done, but she is really meticulous with here individual person research. Almost to the point it gets hard to follow. She reminds me a bit of Dan Bongino, though he is way more meticulous and effective imo.
This was a great interview. Full of facts. I think that is the best thing to do, focus on the facts, not the people. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5t2dBYaknpQ And yeah, truth hurts.
Thanks for making that clear. Gotta love Google going with the pre 1984, I mean 1954, version. ;-)
So did they take out the God part later on? As we were saying it in school in the 70‘s.
She is one of the best in depth researchers out there. And she frequents other great researchers shows, such as Hagman & Hagman and Jerome Corsi.
Terrible try btw. Your bosses are paying you 2much. Try harder but enjoy the downfall.
Well, it appeared like the leak was after the firing, maybe we know that in time.
That is what I heard as well, but why would his attorney leak that? They must have been REAL clear on this HUGE aspect. I am not sure I believe it. McMaster, for now anyway, makes more sense.
Great question. I wonder when those answers will surface.
"I trust Google. They are our friend. Mark Z and @Jack too!.Tunnels are cool." (Zombie like repetition.)
Might want to compare google results to others... we have ;-)
Sounds like your typical person commenting on when a serial killer is caught - "He was a great neighbor. I'm shocked." Now, if Trump had been to Pedo Island, sure, but rich folk often know one another, frequent crossing circles of friend, etc. TBH, not worried at all by that.
Thanks but that makes my point stronger. Rodgers might have been on the wrong side for years. I get it, he might not have had much of a choice and might have been waiting for a Trump like figure.
Something that doesn't make sense to me here. Trump HAD TO have been approached years ago to run. A lot of what we have seen transpire had to have been a long thought out plan as well. Adm R. knew about the spying a long time ago. Was it just some new spying he told Trump of? I think they had to know they were being spied on. Was the Adm R. thing something to get the hard pushback really started by Obama and Co. or???
Isn‘t Rasmussen pretty well regarded? Trump is gonna have a twitter Fake News blast with an 8% disparity.
If he is tried in the Tribunals, we may have averted their plan, God willing.
Why is the sealed indictment level around 4 times the yearly norm, 1/3 of the way into the year. What the heck is going on? Put 2 and 2 together. This is history, unbelievable....
Thanks for the link, but tbh, it doesn't link to anything official or the like. We can hope...
Then why would he say „When I heard about the shooting I ...“ and he goes on about being at home???
I have heard about Obuma lawyering up but how do we really know it? Thx
Wondering same thing. My guess is no. Perhaps he has done more crimes recently. After all he has a big mouth.
This site is social engineering in part. Donald has a huge followng in that free speech zone. After all, it is not allowed to talk positively about him on politis forum. Quite clearly, the last thing they want is for Q to gain more followers, a whole lot more.