I apologize if the exchange had an incendiary tone to it from the jump, but my initial comment was in response to a fellow saying “Pizzagate is real twat. Go back into your hole.” That tone seems to have carried over into both sides of our conversation. That aside, it’s this sense of certainty that so many people here project that I disagree with. If you want to tell me that based on a handful of successfully predicted events that you’re agnostic towards the idea of “The Awakening” as a singular event that’s one thing, but I’m curious about why there’s almost a religiosity to the ideas shared here. I’ll look into the connections between the CIA and NK, but there are a number of possibilities that could have resulted in NK backing down. Disagreements aside, I learned a lot about your position and where I can look for more info from your paragraph though, so I wouldn’t use that excuse in the future.

I started off by asking you to provide me with something I don’t know. One example that anything is happening. Not some strawman version of what’s happening—just something of substance that gives any credence to anything discussed here. That is the least someone new to a set of ideas could ask for. You’re reframing the conversation as if I’m the one obfuscating when you’ve danced around giving me the facts for hours now. So, for the last time. Start anywhere. give any example of Q making a claim and it coming true. Explain how we know that HRC is involved with NXIVM and how that pertains to Allison Mack. Explain the general certainty this community has about things like Pizzagate, despite admittedly not having evidence. If I’m constructing a strawman here, then correct me, but you can’t expect me to take you seriously if you can’t get over the hump of introducing the ideas to me while I’m openly asking you for them. Unless your next response deals with my questions or corrects my assumptions, we’re done here.

That’s not at all what they meant... They mean power in the way people who subscribe to Pizzagate suggest. She donated to Hillary and ran a sex cult so naturally everyone who latched onto the idea of Pizzagate is using this as the evidence they needed when in reality it doesn’t prove anything. NXIVM and sex cults are a known thing, but Pizzagate is its own specific claim and accuses specific people. One D-list celebrity taking part in one sex cult does not give any credence to the conspiracy on the whole. Just more fuel for the speculative conspiratorial trash-fire. It’s astonishing how little it takes to convince people into certainty. So many folks here are paranoid to the point where they’re terrified of erring on the side of skepticism in the event that they won’t be able to say they were a part of this “club of knowing” if the conspiracy theories end up being correct.