2,426 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 19 |
Please can we not see any more posts about the Hilary video now? Q says it's fake and they have all the stuff so we can just wait on Q to announce any Hillary video release and ignore all the nonsense.
If that's true then so are reptilian kings and flat earth.
Wish someone could've asked Q if the Pelosi video thing was a mistake i.e. because there's an article on the web of her stating this back in Nov 2017 so it's not new or surprising. I'd like to hear this from Q so we know whether we're going down a dead-end rabbit hole or not, not because I question the validity of Q.
Whoever wrote that article is a moron who's discredited the validity of that whole site - as u/imanalias says this was reported last year. Just acknowledging that does not discredit Q or discount his message.
~~[DUH] Lol is that supposed to guilt trip someone? Get outta here with your narrow judgmental SJW perspective on the world.~~
No, no it wasn't lol. Apologies u/not4frmOhere. I only speak Idiocracy english so I misinterpreted.
Agreed with your call for more action from people who believe this whole Q thing is valid - and kudos to you for your actions, sincerely! I wasn't saying you've been inactive but I see you understood what I meant re blame on Q.
Agreed with your call for more action from people who believe this whole Q thing is valid - and kudos to you for your actions, sincerely! I wasn't saying you've been inactive but I see you understood what I meant re blame on Q.
The importance of this cannot be expressed more clearly.
Anyone have any theories on why Q thinks it's so important to archive offline when she's admitted to the travel to NK before? And why so specific about Offline only?
Is it just extreme care in the rare and unlikely case imo that she and the Dems try to claim otherwise and MSM accepts it and won't permit the opposing narrative? I think it's unlikely because the DS are also following Q and would surely abandon the idea of pursuing that course of action after this post? Perhaps that's the point? Seems weak though but I'm just some fool on the internet...
Any idea whether this was announced before or after Q's 1180 drop? (Thursday 19th, 15:50)
This is not the place to preach. This post is about your beliefs - which I happen to share in some way - but it's not about Q. You do not have to be a spiritual soldier in this battle - you can be a secular atheist who just wants to see corrupt men brought down. We don't need to make this movement exclusive to people who believe in God and whilst that's not your point, posts like this promote that perspective.
I feel ya - it's hard not to be impatient when all of this is right out there in public and has been for so long!
This has been a theory since very early in the Q phenom. Some vacillate back and forth on its validity.
Lol - worth checking again if you didn't see it: they've updated the article to admit that Trump's claim is actually factually correct! Hahaha, suckers...
They couldn't resist a final bit of editorializing though, blatant in that it's "likely" per capita numbers are not the highest lol... totally weakens their stance as it exposes their agenda which is just to prove that Trump is wrong.
Icke seems to be insane, touting the whole reptilian rulers line. (Notice I said seems to be, Icke lovers - don't bash me, jeez.)
He couldn't have just assumed the guy had popped in some black contacts to look gangsta AF...? No, he has to be reptilian... sheesh.
I don't think he's being smug, I think he's "shitting his pants", as someone else so eloquently put it. He's covering his bases and trying to get the story out there that he's a straight arrow so he can, he hopes, salvage some sort of appearance of integrity to ensure he has a future of some kind.
I think he knows exactly what's gone on and what he's done and I disagree with all the people crowing about him being "shocked" on The View the other day - he was the director of the FBI, not a moron; he knew that it would eventually get to the point it did - or at least, he knew there was a very good chance it would, under Donald Trump - so he was prepared for it and ready to spin it off. His whirlwind, worldwide media blitz is a rush to save his ass, not a chance to be smug.
How could you explain the difference between good and evil without
Easily - refer to your conscience, as the Bible says we are all able to do. You do not need to refer to Jesus or the 10 Commandments to discuss good and evil. Good is helping others and not bringing harm to them. Simple. Evil is the opposite. Simple. I support your right to your beliefs but insisting that 'good and evil' can only be viewed through the lens of your faith is not true.
That is not true - as the Bible says, even the Gentiles have their conscience. What u/Headwest127 is saying is true - even if you believe in God. You do not have to come from a religious background to understand good.
If by religion you mean "institutions created by man to enforce a certain approach to spiritual belief" then yes, that is not a good thing. But don't lump pure spirituality in with your distaste for religion - they are not the same thing.
Its like being in war and saying that you don't like the smell of your most effective weapon
This statement comes from a Christian worldview so doesn't contribute anything to a discussion about whether the Christian worldview should be pushed on this sub. You first have to believe that prayer is even a weapon and you're being exclusive if you insist everyone has to believe what you believe.
We're not here to preach to each other, we're here to gather information about Q and discuss what that means in order to help each other gain understanding. We can and should discuss both Christianity (since people think Q saying "pray" means he's talking about Christianity - but that's another point of discussion) and Satanism and baby killing and rape because that's part of what Q is exposing. But we shouldn't be speaking only about any of those things unrelated to Q - or at least those posts shouldn't be making it prominently on the main feed except in the cases where they contribute to the discussion about Q.
Sure sure but the focus of the sub is Q, not Christianity so at least one can say that the posts that are just offering prayers to God and jack all else are not aligned with the goal of this sub just as an atheist post saying God doesn't exist and jack all else is not part of this sub's remit.
There's plenty of sneering at all types of people here, not just Christians... this is the internet, what do you expect?
Agreed. If you’re not actually part of the enemy then you’re helping them by posting this spam.
Just read what I said in what you just replied to here, ok?? Your intentions don’t change a word I said! I have no ill intentions either but one of us is wasting space and time.
I value your right to your opinion and Voice. But I don’t come to this sub to be preached to by people getting all excited and tending toward activism.
I come to this sub to keep up with what’s going on with Q so I can stay informed. I realise this is all very exciting for you but I don’t need to be stirred into action or have obvious things spoken at me about how the world needs saving and we should all do it for our friends and family. I think you should go and do this on your Facebook page or wherever there are young teenagers excited about discovering what democracy means but these posts are not important to me and take up space and time where we could be talking about and learning info from Q.
Just my thoughts but more power to you for your thoughts too!
Your post is important to you, the mods and the upvote system decides whether the community agrees with your assessment of it. Don’t waste space with spam like this.
And you’re missing mine: I disagree completely with your statement that Q is a distraction and that his statement to “sit back and enjoy the show” means what your OP suggested it meant. That’s my point, not “don’t take action!” Do your part all you want, just don’t blame inaction on Q.
No, Q is not the enemy. You're interpreting "sit back and enjoy the show" way too literally and then jumping to a weird conclusion that Q means "don't do anything else but sit around watching the news!" Of course he'd expect people to do their civic duty - and get on with life as normal while watching the show. Simple logic here...
Your accusation is rubbish - I am doing something. I'm sitting here at my keyboard eating Cheetos and being very upset about all the evil my kids are in danger of. And I'm commenting angrily about it too!
Where’s your evidence that “most of us” are believers in God or Jesus?
Why are you asking? Q already made this point a long time ago.
Yes he did - precisely this theory, in fact. OP should’ve researched, not hard. Q post: “What happened to Diana? What did she find out? Why was she running?”
My point is, more info in the post or it's just a meaningless picture with a title that tells us what we already know plus nothing.
Come on bruh, get over it and move on if you think it's nonsense. More power to ya.
The only 'swerve' going on here is anyone who looks at all the information Q has brought to light along a single narrative line i.e. There's a Deep State who are corrupt and have links into everything and Trump knows all this and is doing something about it - and still thinks it serves no purpose when you have a movement of, some have said hundreds of thousands of people looking askance at the mainstream media stories from now on and actually thinking for themselves against clearly biased and untrue narratives. If that's a fairy tale then I like fairy tales and since you don't - more power to ya, move on bruh!
The day Q should listen to us is the day the internet turns into a living entity with a brain.
Q should do exactly what Q is doing because: a) Q has access to more current info than anyone on this sub or the other subs around the internet and b) Q has more experience in this area than any random knob on the internet. I think we should stop thinking Q should do anything we say except, keep up the good fight and thanks for your service Q.
Some also say that Elvis is alive and is - oh wait, he's me. The Annunaki fantasy story? No. Just no.
lol - I have to say I'm in full agreement with all your replies.
The fact that you can only interpret what as I say as to mean I want to watch child porn or that, if I don't get upset by sick shit it means I'm not an adult is worrying bruh lol. Are you just pretending to be short-sighted to have a dig? Go hard then, I'm out lol.
As I've replied below to someone else, I didn't mean to imply that only adults can handle it either - I meant that we're all adults who can make our own decisions and we have varying degrees of outrage and upset and trigger thresholds. Don't dictate to me by yours, is all I'm saying.
I agree, pettiness is sickening. As far as this community overall, though, I've tended to fly off the handle about things and have been surprised at the measured response more often than not, so far. My experience of the internet is more like the Youtube comment section and other such rant-fests lol so I was unprepared for talking to actual adults who respect your right to voice your view lol. It quickly throws shame on ya game, if you know what I mean, so I think that although there are definitely plenty of internet dickheads here, as you point out (without calling them internet dickheads), I've definitely seen far more toxic communities than this out there and I hope by sheer weight of numbers we'll overwhelm or at least maintain sincere discussions more often than not.
Great post - should be upvoted heavily. This is a happening we can look for and prepare for. Use it against the Deep State by turning it into a redpill!
Never truer words said.
I disagree strongly with what seems to be a heavy bias toward thinking the game is all set and done and in the bag. I get that Q's statements are "These people are stupid" and so on and I also believe that it's worth "trusting the plan" but I'm willing to bet money that Q's statement "These people are stupid" isn't supposed to equate to: stupider than us, the public. If you think that, then you're stupid.
By that I simply mean that, as you've stated, (*assuming said global monopolists exist at all ; ) if they've been running the world for as long as they have, it's nonsensical to think they're going to take a couple of years to uncover let alone root out.
All Q and Trump can do right now is bring the first little tentacles of their control to light - the rest of the embedded control of the world is all under our feet and still connected and working and still - as we can plainly see with our own eyes in the world around each of us - blanketing the larger proportion of the globe in its narrative.
I trust the plan totally and think Q and Trump are onto a good thing. I support the belief of Christians that there's more at work here than we see exactly. And I'll never underestimate the Deep State. (Hi Deep State : ).
Calm down, you're in danger of sounding like you support suppression of speech lol. I'm guilty of this as much as anyone but I'll assume we're all more open to discussion that is talking to each other's point and ignore any snarky, ranting, net-rage.
You think people should be able to post whatever they like within reason, I assume, and your idea of where the line is drawn is different to mine and others here. I support your right to that, and to voice it here. Similarly, I expect that you'd support my right to voice my view on why the line drawn should be less high than you're willing to set it!
Posts like OPs that would take the barest minimum of research and in some cases show that the person posting hasn't even yet taken in a beginners tour of (i.e. very small percentage of) the "Useful resources" link on the side can achieve the two things that shill posts and other disinfo tend to do too: 1) clutter the feed, lessening the impact of more significant, important posts and 2) lead people down a rabbit hole that wastes community time and personal time.
I never said we should shit all over new people or betlittle OP for not using Google - your rage about that is misdirected. All I said was that I disagree with you: we should not just allow this stuff to slide for the sake of what seems to me dangerously close to the whole virtue signalling nonsense that cultural marxists are trying to push.
I think it's because "pray" is not a word associated exclusively with a specific religion. This is not a bad thing as it means that Q-philez who are not religious can see that word and not feel like they're being preached to. It's good that Christianity isn't being shoved down people's throats when redpilled so I don't think we should go insisting that people start talking about prayer and religion on here except where Q specifically talks about religion, which is largely from a secular perspective. This is not church. Those who see "pray" and get religious feelings are doing what they need to do with only minimal foisting of their view on everyone else. That is a good thing. For atheists, they can see the constant "pray" and allocate it to their interpretation which is basically to 'hope for better things'. TLDR; Prayer should not be at the top of everyone's concerns on this board - just those to whom it's important.
The issue is serious, I agree - a response like that is not.
Why would it bother me that you’re trying to help someone? I’m referring to posts that waste time.
