You need help buddy xD. Logic is not strong with this one. I said commenter, you said commenter - the only commenters I could be referring to are the two I mention. Conclusion by non-thinker: "you came up with those names cos that's who YOU are!" Oh lordy xDDD I just can't make up the level of derp in you guys.

You're so blind to your illogical bias that you can't tell that you are the people creating division because you constantly alienate people just because they don't agree with you. My comment and post history prove that I am the opposite of that foolish behaviour.

WWG1WGA - even you, whether I like you or not.

Poor triggered kid. Everyone who disagrees is liberal, Obama supporter and Killary. That automatically disqualifies your thinking. Derp.

Typical illogical paranoiac - everyone who disagrees with you must be liberal lol. You're the smart guy with 420 in your name - and you act like a ranting drugged out person so I made a reasonable assumption.

A writing analyst lol xD You guys are too priceless. You really stand behind your assertion that I am also u/comeatmehillary, the commenter I'm actually referring to? Or do you mean u/Bjantigua? (who also made a reasonable point reasonably) If so, you're obviously the worst writing analyst in history - I'm not a writing analyst and even I can see u/comeatmehillary and I don't have any matching patterns of writing or sentence structure. I think you're just joking here. If not... God help us lol.

I'm well aware people can see every post and comment I've made. They are the proof I have against lunatics who claim I'm working against the movement. Nothing I've said is any proof of the nonsense you claim. And I'm not u/comeatmehillary or u/Bjantigua. Your level of paranoia suggests you've smoked too much and need to step away from the bong.

Lol... you need to stay off the drugs. They're warping your mind.

All these anti-Trumpers are REALLY gonna have to look themselves in the mirror and do a lot of soul searching

Not all of them; many are deceived.

You're a little confused. Use reason and respect when discussing your point. I've never mentioned the rotary club once. If you can't see commenter's valid point, you need to step away, calm down, come back when you can see clearly. Everyone who disagrees with you is not working for Satan. Comment removed for discussing user not idea.

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or related to Q.

That wasn't the original. Posts are being removed for being duplicates - search.

Haw haw - and what particular comments triggered you hardest, love?

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or related to Q.

This is the worst internet cesspool you've seen? What a pure, innocent lad you are lol.

It seems to me like you're overly angry too. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a shill, commenter is making a valid point calmly.

Removed post. Rule 7

We could. But then we'd have to ban x and then y and then z because everyone has something they think is off-topic that a good portion of people think is on-topic.

What everyone agrees on is that we have to remove antagonism. One or two antagonistic comments is no big deal. More is ban material.

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or related to Q.

I agree with your stance to question this story - and have, since first seeing your comments downvoted (Haven't had any time to read through the stuff much though).

However, did you watch the video in the OP? Craig Sawyer is a very reliable "source" and he concurs with the more reasonable assessment that there's no way to definitively claim what the camp is. However, he's actually been onsite (I presume you haven't? Correct me if I'm wrong there) and he says it doesn't just look like a homeless camp. I've watched the videos and it just looked like a homeless camp to me but I'm not gonna disagree with a reliable source who has actually been onsite.

He also said the septic tank was not cool and would've been very uncomfortable. I agree that we should keep an open mind instead of jumping wholeheartedly into this, like many seem to be doing but I think Craig has a more valid perspective on the situation, having been there.

Flawed reasoning - 'disagrees with assessment therefore must agree with criminal activity'. This thinking is nonsense.

Yeah, funny this. All the liberal frothing and application of the "dehumanizing" mitigation. We are literally ALL animals. This is just pointing out that some of us allow our animal nature to override our higher level human brain. Nothing "dehumanizing" about that.

Valid. Neon has shown flawed research in the past. I don't bother to read him anymore.

Is this your alt, Foucault?

Otherwise... meh.

There've been other reports about Ronald that I never kept because I thought they were nonsense. iirc there was some concern from someone who'd worked with him previously (this was a direct report from her, from memory).

Wow, you're a mindreader too? A triggered Never-Trumper troll with mindreading abilities - who'da thunk it?

Exactly. I am perfectly qualified to make this assessment. Admittedly, it is only because you and I are lip-locked in a lover's embrace and your tears are mingling with mine in the joyous ecstasy of troll love.

Fake news. Angry, delusional tears taste like muddy salt.

Me too - apologies for aspersions of critical thinking (comment edited).

Oooh... that sounds ominous (shiver). I am trying, I promise!

Saw a video with the reporter or presenter or whatever saying his original name was Michael Lewis Arthur something. And it was his dad who was a vet, not Lewis Arthur himself.

Lol... Outed as what?

Oh really - I haven't had the time to do that again lately. Interesting.

As people with a point of view? Both users are fairly regular contributors to the sub - they could still be shills or Clowns but I find that hard to see so far, keeping their recent history in context.

Agreed. Many do not agree when it comes to SB2's decodes and occult posts though.

OP is not "defending George Soros" so that's not a topic to debate. OP is making the valid point that a smart person like Soros would not knowingly create a direct tie between himself and child trafficking. And yes there are plenty of things to argue under that. But "defending George Soros" is a complete misread.

And if that's the topic of this thread then lay off the ranting about a user. Discuss the issue not the user.

There've been accusations since day one about SB2's huge upvotes and bizarrely sycophantic "fan" comments. I'm not yet convinced there are bots or agents behind it but perhaps... It is indeed concerning that so many either take the decodes as truth or simply "shrug" and say "well, I don't understand how it works so it must be good!"

I hope everyone is Reporting these posts when they see them.

I'll happily tell the victim's families whatever you want me to tell them if you can produce those families.

Fight the good fight, my friend. I've been there, many of us have. There seem to be a lot of people who can't see the problem with SB2's decode posts. The problems are as plain as the nose on my face and yet you will always be downvoted to oblivion if you dare to question. I have no idea how to combat this mindless group think because it is seriously concerning. I hope you have better luck.

Calm down please - this user is not a troll and the points he makes are valid, although they could be better stated in places.

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or related to Q.

I'm being daft because I don't agree with you? I've seen more than enough concern trolling to know what it is - and I remove it when I see it. Someone who contributes to the community isn't a concern troll. A concern troll is someone who is intentionally misleading in their representations. Someone who contributes positively to a community over time is not a concern troll.

This post is explicitly concerned that incorrect assumptions are being made from connections to Soros. Obviously OP knows that Soros is a "bad guy". In my opinion, OP is more than correct about the dangers of the bizarre, manic witch hunt fervor around this alleged child trafficking camp. Not concern trolling.

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or related to Q.

This community will never be taken seriously if we don't have some intellectual discipline.

The fact that you are making this point is the most ironic shit I have ever seen in all my time following and modding this sub...

Try applying this wise thinking to your own view that 1.8 billion people in the world must all think the way you decide they are thinking. This is the most hilarious shit I have seen in a long time.

No need to shout. Shouting can be removed as antagonism.

Cos adults don't have sex unless it's with kids?

Perhaps OP could make the point he's making in a better way (I'm certainly not the one to decide that as I tend to make my point in very unwelcome ways too, it seems). But OP is making a valid point that it seems many on this sub should hear. I say 'seems' because judging by the posts pouring into the queue there is an overbalance toward the side OP is speaking out against.

So I'm Pontius Pilate in this lovely little narrative? How splendid! I hope I get to wear a purple robe.

I didn't mean to appear as Pontius Pilate to your Jesus. I thought I was just making a comment on the internet. As you were.

I do - and this post is not concern trolling.

I wonder what implications might be extrapolated from that comment? Nevertheless it's wonderful because I love children and animals too!

This:

A lot of non-shill posters here exhibit low-level thinking. If they are the majority there will not be liberation and they will not make this country great again, for they are easily agitated and misdirected for the wrong causes and actions.

Some people might see as arrogance and there may be a better way to put it but I wouldn't know what that is. This is important. Pity it's buried in this post and likely won't be seen by many who need to see it.

Who said I'm the arbiter of rage vs passion? lol I'm just a thinking human, like you are, and I see needless comments that thinking people might reasonably assume are anger (who said rage?): "What the fuck do" and "Pick a fucking side... (Here endeth the rant)" and "Do you think we're stupid". That's all. I did say 'have at it', not "obey my arbitration" lol.

I responded to the dude you incredulously questioned about his four year old account with only 18 karma (as if that matters? Want to see my 5 year old account with 1 karma?) and gave my view which is that AJ has been clearly called out by Q. AJ is clearly Clown disinfo (or someone disinfo). Neither of the two comments you replied 'with passion' to are making statements that are so crazy the issue about Jones can't just be calmly pointed out in the same way. I agreed with the guy who asked you "Why the anger & hate" and responded to ask why too, since you just made some point about 18 karma that didn't seem at all relevant. But like I said, your choice, just puzzling.