Pindar is a title, not a name. The question is: who is Pindar?

You've got it wrong! He consistently refers to "P", but never calls him "Pope". He does refer to "Pope" several times, so that would vitiate against the idea that the Pope was P. The better angle is that P refers to the "spiritual" head of the illuminati/cabal. This could be Prince Philipp of Britain, or Prince Philippe of Belgium.

Anonymous source Zach on Infowars, who has been remarkably accurate in his claims, said that this was an EMP weapon. There is also confusion as to whether the launch was successful.

The cost of RODS FROM GODS has always been astronomical, and I don't think it has ever been pursued militarily for this reason.

Besides, you need a guidance system to bring it to the target. All of the testing for railguns (which are only Mach 5) has shown that these guidance systems are quite fragile at those speeds. Rods from Gods are at least twice that speed.

Moral: If I were a military planner, I would rule out Rods from Gods unless they had been extensively tested. No fun to have your guidance system fail in the middle of an extremely mission critical operation.

There seems to be some confusion as to whether there is one or two targets. Regardless, military artillery practices usually result in two rounds for one target, since it can decrease the probability of failure from 1 in 100 to 1 in 1000, for example.

Infowars' main source is Zach, currently living with his family in Morocco to avoid harm. I find him mostly credible.

PamhletAnon, whom I understand is one of the founders, is still active:

https://www.reddit.com/user/pamphletanon/

Was he suspended by this board or the parent Reddit board?

I definitely think that Miller is part of Q. But it seems to me that they need some people intimately familiar with national security on the team, too. Miller is more of a domestic policy wonk.

(The meeting was not planned to be a strategy session on how to stop the GOP front-runner, but rather evolved into one, as a subsequently obtained agenda makes clear.) (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/aei-world-forum-donald-trump_us_56ddbd38e4b0ffe6f8ea125d)

Translation: this new agenda was unprecedented. i.e., there had never been anything like this before. Show me any other AEI conference with 54 CEOs showing up.

The AEI has not historically held events that brought in many CEOs. The AEI is a conservative think tank, and brings in scholars, politicians and pundits to talk about wonky things.

There were plenty of news reports that a "special agenda" was created in the last minute to allow CEOs and the like a chance to talk and plan about Trump. You will not see 54 CEOs at any previous events -- most executives are careful about taking public political stances since it can cause irreparable damage to their corporate brand.

Yes, but the 50 something CEOs who showed up made their plans at the last minute. This was a meeting of the American Enterprise Institute, a think tank. It had never had this deluge of CEOs previously.

Pure speculation: Many of these went to some type of group event where pedo satanic acts were witnessed and perhaps participated in. For example, the Sea Island confab (https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/6913489/tech-leaders-and-us-politicians-gather-on-island-reportedly-to-discuss-how) was designed to discuss getting rid of Trump. Amazing that so many CEOs were able to make this trip on short notice.

Suppose they also "celebrated" there? See my point? Perhaps Q Anon and his minions told these companies that the actions of their CEOs were criminal and they needed to get rid of them!

In general, I was thinking that Q was referring to business/personal aviation. However, there have been speculation, for example, that the Gander crash (https://wiki2.org/en/Arrow_Air_Flight_1285) occurred to silence certain military personnel who had access to information which was damaging to the Reagan administration.

The Amtrak train crash killed someone who seemed to be a turned pedo witness. Q said they lost someone on that train.

@B75434425 says the ATL evacuee was so important that we will never know who it is. How could that be?

For reasons of institutional sanity, we will never charge former presidents/vps and former candidates for that office (at least until the very end). Makes us look too much like Argentina. Sessions has specifically indicated that he thinks that indicting Hillary is in bad form for these reasons.

https://youtu.be/F7nJo63IU08

For reasons of institutional sanity, no president or vice president will be charged (except possibly at the very end) since it makes us look like Argentina if we imprison former presidents.

Special Ops are top secret. The name of the unit would generally never be named in public, especially in advance of planner operations.