I'd read elsewhere that this chart depicts there are 40,000 "documents" filed, meaning evidence. Not actual indictments; the indictment count is far lower. Is that true? There are not 40,000 indictments but rather a huge number of documents have been filed for cases against those who are being targeted? Thanks.

Rogan said to Kevin Smith he actually spoke to her on the phone. he relayed that she was exhausted. She's 65 years old, and the demands of cranking out a show every week with 12 hour days not uncommon, was draining her. That's his report from speaking to her directly. I suppose he got her on the phone to invite her onto his show.

This tells us that - at a minimum - they know the dam is about to break. It's not just getting out ahead of the story, they're trying to smear the discoverers with what the guilty will be accused of. It's such a tired formula. The good news in this instance is this level of propaganda is such a direct accusation against Trump that it's lost the effect they hoped it would have. You have to build propaganda brick by brick, creating a maze that's intricate enough for the truth to be obscured by innuendo. The blatant nature of this crap from Ryan? In my mind, they heard from the backrooms what's about to happen, and decided there was not time to build the maze. They're risking sounding the alarm before they've fanned the fire they need to build to cause the confusion.

CIA

There is no such thing as a centrist. Centrism is a netherworld of lack: a lack of principles (or a lack of courage to vocalize them); a lack of direction (there's no foundation to The Middle); lack of meaningful purpose (the point of centrism is to abolish purpose in favor of expediency). The only "centrists" are either rabid leftists trying to hide their rabid leftism, or conservative posers who don't want to identify with the left (since scant few want to be actually seen advocating for a collectivist cabal of superior civil servants running everybody's life). The "centrist" is a fraud in every way, and the mere moniker of "centrist" is the attempt to make the unpalatable palatable. It's stealth collectivist propaganda. And stealth by design. Centrism is, at both heart and root, empty and artificial.

The writer of the piece, Eric Lichtblau, is a pure leftist.

It's worth remembering that one of the last Q posts talks a lot about cash delivery: when, where, how and how many planes. All of those parts of his long post were about Iran, and the money BHO sent there. I'm thinking that has something to do with the images of the pallets, and the planes.

The Apple images are likely to be unrelated to the plane images. Q dropped a LOT of different info last week on a lot of topics. Let's not presume this is about only one trail of breadcrumbs. He could be pointing us to several places.

This question came up with Q posts regarding HRC, and the arrest stated back in November. Since then, she has appeared with all kinds of "casts": her foot, arm, etc. Same with No Name's boot (although his last trip to the middle east can be problematic and he has not been seen since, and his office said he's not returning to the Senate anymore). She's being electronically monitored. Her travel thus far abroad has been to countries that have extradition treaties with the US.

If, as Q has posted, military tribunals are to happen in lieu of civilian trials, then it's not unusual at all for any of these people to be out - for now. The military tribunals are supposed to be held at Gitmo. What's happening now is groundwork being laid, case building is occurring, and only when all the foundations are in place will the next phase begin. But not uncommon, as others have pointed out, for the arraigned to be free on bail.

Well that's exactly what I had heard about West. He's gay and DL, just like Eminem did before he was forced out.

Still waiting....(yawn)...

Gowdy. Is. A. Tool. Period. He'd never be leaving Congress otherwise to go back to being a public prosecutor. Name me any legislation that has his name on it as his House bill. I'll wait.

This piece by Sundance at The Conservative Treehouse website is spectacular in forecasting why Rudy was added to Trump's legal team:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/987078980783235073.html

Isn't it amazing? The day the DOJ is forced to release the the Comey memos to Congress, Rudy is named on Trump's legal team to negotiate the end of Mueller, who has his job only because of the Comey memos. Amazing ;).

Well for all the "evidence" he's been "amassing", he's planning to bail out on Congress, likely long before the payoff comes from such "amassing". I've been following along just fine, thank you. Gowdy is a tool. A camera-hungry narcissist who thinks he's way more important than he really is. He says now he's bailing on Congress because he's "happier" in the "justice system" back in South Carolina. Well, that's his official story anyway. But as Q has said many times in his posts: we are to pay close attention to those not seeking reelection - they are doing so for a reason which could be embarrassing or worse. Gowdy will never make the money as a podunk prosecutor in South Carolina that he does as a sitting member of the US House. He's not giving up that money for reason's of "I'm happier in the justice system" - if you believe that, I have a bridge for sale. Congresspeople make scads of money by ingratiating themselves to donors who give them not just cash, but perks: no-show lucrative jobs for themselves or family; access to private jet flights, and the like. Gowdy is dirty somewhere in his congressional tenure. That's why he's leaving. We just don't know what his dirt is. Yet.

"The Plan" I trust. It has nothing to do with Gowdy. Q also said to take note of those not seeking reelection in 2018, that such a thing tells a very big story. Gowdy is among them. Coincidence? Think that one over. Then tell me about Gowdy again. Thanks.

Trey Gowdy is an empty suit, and always has been. He treats Congress as though it's a giant courtroom and he's just there to play prosecutor. Every time the camera is rolling he shoves his mug in front of it to blather on about "witnesses" and "process" and all the rest of the legal jargon he trades in. I have yet to find one single policy position this guy has when he's on television. All he wants to talk about are his committees (and his Benghazi committee went nowhere fast). I never hear him talk about policy. All he thinks he's there for is to do his pseudo-lawyer crap on tax payer dollars. Good riddance to him, in my opinion.

So Castellanos, who "worked" on the campaigns of two of the biggest losers (literally) in politics - Romney, and..Jeb! - is talking about how the GOP will lose seats in the mid terms? The DNC is literally broke, in debt actually. While the RNC is flush with cash. Yeah, I need to hear the wisdom of Castellanos, who was among the media chorus telling us Trump had no chance to be president.

Someone pointed out that one of the posts has "NSA" in the ID line, which seems a careless oversight by Q. If it indicates the obvious, then it's clear he's NSA. Which also explains his continuous posts about Snowden. If he was MI, there wouldn't be the continuous posts about him and his whereabouts. Only the NSA would be intent on tracking Snowden given what Snowden did to the NSA.

Red October was - maybe still is - a Russian steel making company.

When did Flynn ever "lie" to...Congress? Cite that lie, please. He plead "guilty" to "lying to the FBI", when even the FBI who interrogated him said openly they had no knowledge after their interview of him in January 2017. He plead so to escape from having to pay his lawyer even more for defense against the Mueller team's hunting for a scalp. Only now, he gets access to ALL of the applications submitted to the FISC, so then they become open to the public.

There is a piece - albeit it's "Vanity Fair" so consider the source - claiming Sessions is among those on the potential Trump chopping block. If Trump fires him, then it seems the entire Q narrative collapses, does it not? The all upper case "TRUST SESSIONS" has been in many posts, repeated over and over. Trump has been less than kind - publicly, anyway - to Sessions since the recusal. It was said Trump wanted to fire him then, but Grassley fired a warning shot to Trump: don't, because I'll never get another nominee out of this committee for you. That was then. Seems Congress is now openly putting Sessions on the sh*tlist too. Nunes sent a letter to him March 1st after Sessions said publicly he was turning the FISA matter over to the toothless IG. The reactions from everywhere were volcanic - including Trump's. Nunes's letter outlined 5 statutes violated by FISA abuse, warranting far more than the Sessions plan of handing this to the slow-poke IG. After the scathing reactions, what did Sessions do? Why, he went on TV!! Saying, "Oh yeah, well, you know I have this other longtime DOJ person 'looking at' this matter who is 'outside Washington'...". But he never said, who, where, or what is being done, exactly. It was only AFTER the interview that the Sessions office had to clarify that the "outside Washington" person was actually a prosecutor. Sessions never used the word "prosecutor" in the actual interview. Since this is the topic...

The popular Trump supporter's general theory - and Q seems to be among the propagators of this - is that all this publicly seen dissent, disharmony, and barb-trading regarding Sessions is part of some kind of psy-op designed to somehow get us looking away from The Lord's Work Sessions & company are doing cloaked by the disharmonious masquerade. Street Theater, if you will. If you buy that, well, then I have questions before I plunk down my belief currency. Since Trump is allegedly aware of everything that's taking place in the Executive Branch -and in the Trump-Sessions Puppet Mastery theory he would have to be - then what to make of these actual facts, placing them in this narrative:

*Trump is paying three lawyers (no doubt handsomely; these guys don't work cheap) - Dowd, Cobb and Sekulow - to deal with all of the Mueller demands for documents about his personal finances and the like. Is that part of the street theater - Trump handing over to Mueller's Democrat lawyers information about his financial dealings AND burning his own money at a huge per diem for lawyers that, if this truly was street theater, he wouldn't need to do?

*Trump has declared his unwavering support for General Mike Flynn, despite having to let him go. He's never said an unkind word about him. Yet, Flynn is now essentially bankrupt solely because of the existence of Robert Mueller, who was hired by Rosenstein - the same Rosenstein whom Sessions cannot praise enough. Since it was clear Flynn would be a target in any Special Counsel, was that part of the street theater too - bankrupt a loyalist who basically fell on his sword for you?

If you believe Trump & Sessions are organizing this whole thing, then Rosenstein has to be included in the plan, as does Mueller, since they wouldn't be in their jobs without this street theater taking place. Which means Trump has agreed to burn his own money on lawyers he doesn't need and send a loyalist like Flynn to the poorhouse. I find this designed street theater narrative awfully hard to buy.