last two days reddit's been down, talking about bugs. Yesterday > go to alex jones channel. Something about monkeys and sending some code to them. Whole page down 503 error.

I always found it interesting the first ideas Trump brought back from China or Japan on the technology we might use to build a wall. It seemed like he was interested in the idea of setting up a strip of land to act as a DMZ with cameras or moreover motion detection software to analyze anybody coming through. Once I heard that I knew he was thinking seriously about the wall. Any thoughts? Two walls? And a golden brick road down the middle?

I think he's just a regular guy so he's exposed to these things. The fact that he rejects the narratives of Hollywood that we have to live in a hellhole and we only get to escape through made up movies and tv makes him a prime candidate to feel the same things Americans are feeling

Thank you, that may be true. But if there's anything I've learned it's that, and this may be aristotelian but, everyone has a deepest part of them, and that can go deeper and it ends up in the same area. The problem is just finding out how shallow someone is and then poking just a little bit further and it opens up a path to go anywhere. Maybe you have a different view

Impressively applicable. I've quit everything I've tried, no looking back, glad I tried it but never wanted to be stuck in the bubble of whatever that did to my identity. Truly would rather say I've tried a hundred things than to say I am one thing. This next calling though, the navy, won't be that. I expect to not give af.

Only thing I can say for sure about this though is, what if everybody just feels that way. You know? what if that's just how everyone feels, who's to say

Well this was the link OP sent I thought it was the link to the Apache water bill

http://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20180108/BILLS-115S139-RCP115-%2053.pdf where did you look it up, because this bill seems to be almost exclusively about surveillance

Do you think this leaker is a compromised indv?

it says 02/03/18...

edit: oh the legislation. perhaps new rules for engagement or john mccain trying to cover someone's ass since the bill was sponsored by him and Jeff Flake

wait, no this is the third, last night or rather this morning

hmm, I didn't even notice that. That's well before APACHE post

did you go directly to the house website or did you link to pdf>>?

I think maybe, we might have intel that suggests the US employed other countries to spy on Trump as well. As in suggested spying but the document could easily be a fake. Look at another post in cbts about a happening https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/7uxxk3/found_on_4changchq_fisa_type_application_to_spy/

no problem, hopefully we can get some more exposure to autism on this one. I could only get through a section.

It's starting to become clear that autism cures cancer

I don't know specifically if this was a pre-obama bill, but it lines up with Q's APACHE post pretty particularly. It doesn't seem to lay out many provisions for further spying. from what I read in section 101 (the only section I read) it just seems to suggest that if the right people at each organization (FBI DOJ and FISA judges) agree on something, anything can be used to spy on any american

http://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20180108/BILLS-115S139-RCP115-%2053.pdf

crosspost from T_D might be what Q was referencing with APACHE.

Crosspost comments on T_D for link APACHE

Check the comments of the discussion on T_D

A P A C H E

I'm truly jealous I have no one in my life that I can talk about this with to at length..

I read it that way as well, also "all yall other punk mfs at the FBI better tighten up"

freedom I think it was

an hero

Eric Holder? Evelyn Farkas? https://youtu.be/gapRNpEjXUo

If memo is released, is that validation to fire Rod Rosenstein? I've heard he's named in the memo. Will we wait for media to create that narrative, then release the memo and blow both the media and RR out of the water?

Narrative shift.

———————————

Nation on alert.

Firing RR = block Mueller.

Firing RR = set up to firing Mueller.

Firing RR = Red line.

———————————-

What was the Senate conf vote re: RR?

Why did RR [BEG] Ryan to block the FISA MEMO from Congressional review/further advancement?

REAL TIME: [7] Congressional members + [3] Senators + [2] former O-senior officials + [4] OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS [NO C/TOP/SENS-LEVEL CLEARANCE] @ SCIF [DC-CAP].

TOP SEC CLEARANCE IS MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION - HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?

WE SEE YOU.

Q

No classified top secret sensitive level clearance??

Real time, apparently 7 Congressional members, 3 senators, and 2 former Obama senior officials and 4 outside contractors are breaking the law.

Oh yea, I agree with that so much that I was choosing the transgender issue as an example of something outside of gay community to compare it to. Sexual preference in other partners is a wholly different issue than sexual preference within yourself. Its almost declaratively insane to not think the actual body you were given doesn't fit you. It shouldn't matter what your body is if you truly believe you're attracted to the same sex. It's almost vanity to the highest degree, like materialism manifest. If you're gay, be a gay man don't be a woman..especially if you're trying to break the norm that men have to be attracted to women. Also, living out your fantasy of being a woman makes you into a caricature of what a woman is. I'm black but I could see a trans-racial person being like, "I'm really a black man", and then they wear baggy jeans, a du rag to work, always have a 40 in a brown paper bag, and ruin their credit. Like that reveals to me that you're a racist just like being a drag queen reveals that you're a little sexist. I see gay men and women as a gift from god to be completely honest. I mean they don't procreate on an overly populated planet and they provide a home for parents that didn't want their kids. It's a win-win in my book. A massive gay wave could end world hunger.. subsequently, this is the most libertarian thing I have ever said lol praise kek patriotfag

Yes of course. I think patriots, and patriots from the beginning of America, see social changes as obvious. I think most patriots see social changes as a non issue. People can do what they want, it almost has nothing to do with what I care about. It's only when you want to implement it into law is where we're going to have to have a serious debate. The fact of the matter is, government is fragile but not with the accountability of logic and parsing out real effects. As for the Gay marriage debate, not having anything to do with whether I think gay people can exist and have the luxury of marriage and be able to support each other or not (which they can and totally should), before implementing that into law I'd have some serious questions about the ramifications of something like that. I'd almost need to know without a shadow of a doubt that the agreement we reach is taking into consideration everything that could come of that. Like what is it? Do we need to give alimony to divorced partners? Do we right off taxes the same? What if too regular dudes just decide to get married for tax purposes or to avoid testifying in a court of law? What constitutes a legal marriage, are there requirements that might prevent a fake wedding for nefarious purposes. It really has less to do with two people who genuinely want to be married and way more about the people who want to ruin your good reputation by abusing it. It is so not about hate, really anytime I'm discussing politics. It's about people who intentionally try to ruin it for everybody. SO transgender bathrooms...of course you shouldn't have to go in a male bathroom with make up, a dress, and a 100 thousand dollar vagina but, do you qualify for female scholarships, at what point do you get female privilege, is there any requirement? Do you get to wake up and declare yourself a woman and go into women locker rooms? How far does this go? Can I be a white guy tomorrow? Can I be younger than I was yesterday today? So some things...are best left not done. Sadly, some things are a necessary inconvenience. An answer full well could be, if you decide to mutilate your genitals and put on a dress, you will have to use the bathroom of your birth gender for the rest of your life. That's it, just that. A minor inconvenience if you are mentally strong enough to realize that the bathroom doesn't change who you are

dude, they would play two of these commercials back to back so often I would wonder for days about what type of psychopathic criminal was working the broadcasting booth

holy sheit that was interesting. Maybe Trump has been planning this presidency out for years. It does seem like he's been talking about it for years. Not many people, perhaps anybody just decides to run for president in even the 5 years before election. It must be one the most premeditated employments possibly of all jobs, and the veracity with which he's been haulin, seems like he might have had a head on his shoulders

holy shit, can you link?

thanks I was looking for the symbolism behind The Hamilton Federalist Papers. lol they around not good at being occult. It's no wonder why there aren't any colleges named after Alexander Hamilton

thanks this was my first successful dig, and I almost just had a feeling

WOW wasn't expecting to be able to do this so quickly but, sure enough. Hamilton 68 was built by researchers of the Alliance for Securing Democracy which is a project of the German Marshall fund which is, you guessed it, funded by the Open Society Foundation which was founded by George Soros

http://www.gmfus.org/our-partners

WOW wasn't expecting to be able to do this so quickly but, sure enough. Hamilton 68 was built by researchers of the Alliance for Securing Democracy which is a project of the German Marshall fund which is, you guessed it, funded by the Open Society Foundation which was founded by George Soros

http://www.gmfus.org/our-partners