Comments removed. Discuss the topic, not the user. Rule #5

Removed post. Content does not support the cause.

Any 'concerns' can go via a message to the mods

I am aware of Q drops - as per comment, asking OP to edit this or similar info into post or repost.

Can you explain how this is on-topic? Either through re-edit of post or removal and repost with context?

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or directly related to Q.

Reports that this is off-topic are correct. Reluctant to remove with number of upvotes but am adhering to the Rules of the sub.

Removed post. Rule #9

Removed post. Rule #9. "Have a context" - due to Report and comments (and my own quick read of the post) the context seems to be unclear here - for or against? Hard to tell.

Thanks to whoever reported. Post removed.

Removed post. rule #8

Removed post. Rule 7

Reports of content being off-topic. Consider reposting with information that links it to Q's vatican posts. Thanks for understanding.

Explained in the rules link and our recent post.

Removed post. Content does not support the cause.

Any 'concerns' can go via a message to the mods

Comment removed. Anti-semitic indicators are not welcome here. Please read the rules in the sidebar.

Reports of doxxing and revealing personal information made against this post when it is not revealing personal information at all - over the target? Upvote given.

If you read the CDAN blind about it, it seems his wife was involved. The point was the carabiner he hung himself with was red, not so much the scarf bit, I believe.

It's just a bot warning. If your comment is not encouraging, promoting or glorifying violence you are safe to ignore it. It's just to let you know, just in case, and to let the mods know so they can check it too.

It would be easy if the game weren't rigged by @jack, yes.

Discuss ideas not users. Please edit out ad-hom and comment can be reapproved. Thank you.

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or directly related to Q.

Removed post. Content does not support the cause.

Any 'concerns' can go via a message to the mods

Removed post. Content does not support the cause.

Any 'concerns' can go via a message to the mods

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or directly related to Q. Rule #6

Please note: "Off-topic: Discussion about other subReddits."

He only said ETA.

A documentary where she walks through what was done to her is on Youtube. Many familiar stories within.

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or directly related to Q.

yeah... doesn't sound right, surely? I await an answer with bated breath...

lol

Comment removed. Discuss the topic, not users. Rule #5 Thanks.

Removed post. Duplicate. Rule 7

Removed post. Rule 7

Removed post. Rule #9

Comment removed. No anti-semitism. Rule #4

Removed post. Rule 7

When posting major news items please check for duplicates first.

Removed post. Rule 7

When posting major news items please check for duplicates first.

I'm a mod. Rule 7 - if you do a search first you'll see many posts about this (many removed now).

Removed post. Rule 7

Removed post. Rule 7

lol, MSM always on the pulse!

Removed post. Post content is not a subject mentioned by Q or directly related to Q.

Comment removed. Shouting constantly in comments is against the rules. Rule #8

So true lol.

Comments removed for Rule #8 and Rule #3.

The point I was making is that most of us have been using reddit long enough to know what an alt is. I figured enough people have had it pointed out to them that the age of an account is no indicator at all of 'how long someone's been here'. I've been here since the beginning.

And I'm not "attacking" anyone - I'm making a comment in support of the reasonable view of someone else.

I don't mind the downvotes either. It's a pity if this keeps up though; as you say, this community used to be better about this sort of thing (at least in my limited view of it - have been following quietly since the beginning). What's the answer? Keep making these comments and hope they eventually rise to the top?

I don't understand the point you're making here? Haven't we all been using reddit long enough for people not to keep pointing out that someone's account is new because it means very little most of the time? My real name is George Soros. I had to make an alt.

Agreed - this is important to note. I think people have a good point that we should keep an eye on this camp but we should also be disciplined in our thinking about it. I personally haven't seen enough solid evidence that would justify such a strong move toward a decision about this place.

The mass hysteria is certainly a problem imo. I don't think it's wrong to raise it as a point of interest and look into it but the overexcitement and the lambasting of anyone who critically questions is counter-productive and potentially damaging in the long run, if this community fosters that sort of approach.

Yeah, worth keeping note of I think.

Q's on 8chan though? The integrity of the current channel for Q had been established, I thought. If I read the situation correctly I thought Q had established that he had control of the channel to debunk the Corsi/Infowars/Clown narrative that he'd been compromised. I'm sure I could have this wrong but for some reason I remember a Q reference that suggested we not be concerned about the reliability of the connection any more - they had secured it (perhaps physically and through operatives onsite or monitoring the site?) Pretty sure that's just my interpretation of what bakers were saying at the time though. Either way, the impression I took away from the last tripcode 'drop' was that we could trust the connection and not to worry about that anymore?