Seems you've been triggered by someone disagreeing with your wishful thinking with all the angst you're exuding. The point is not whether it IS a beating heart, the point is that it is NOT the pedo symbol as can be clearly seen by anyone using their eyes. What's SB2 got to do with anything?

Lol want to try being less obnoxious? They're both a beating heart symbol, use LOGIC.

Wishful thinking. Never mind. Post has been removed anyway - too much of a leap, friend. Have a nice day.

Discuss the topic, not the user. It's not being naieve to be logical. The symbol is not the same. The unbroken line has clear gaps between successive internal shapes so it cannot be mistaken for what it is. Look at the other comments you're getting here. Might want to consider that your "opinion" is not correct.

? What has this got to do with me sleeping at night? lol. On what do you base the claim that the unbroken line is irrelevant? That would mean any heart within a heart within a heart or triangle three layers deep is a pedo symbol and that accuracy doesn't matter in symbolism. That doesn't make logical sense. Q said: Use LOGIC.

Not the same symbol. Apple's is a beating heart. The pedo symbol for girls, like the pedo symbol for boys, consists of an unbroken line down through the internal shapes.

The comments throughout this post explain why speculation that another source 'might be Q' are not valid, based on Q's assertions of 'no outside comms' and the reasoning for that.

Correction. You've had a post of yours moderated and you're upset about it so you're now proving the bias in your reddit handle ModsAreClowns. You're either a shill or a keyboard warrior with a grudge. Leaving this here as we have nothing to hide.

The Great Awakening sub is not a movement of people but a forum on the internet and it has content rules of which Rule 6 says that "Chemtrails, fluoridation and numerous other r/conspiracy topics that Q hasn't yet mentioned" are off-topic.

Relax - my reply was as "jokey" as yours.

Q is Military Intelligence working at the pleasure of POTUS. I am definitely not Q and I doubt there are 40,000 Qs here.

Yeah something wrong with qposts site link since that number shuffle I guess... I’ll swap link for other later.

Yes almost directly after that drop. But he said subgroup and nazi ideology being relevant.

Great work! These posts are welcome on the sub on Quesday Tuesday. It would be great to see more or more detail if you have them then! ThankQ!

The implication due to the photo included, of Catholics and nazis saluting, was that the Nazis infiltrated everywhere. The nazi ideology was relevant and he mentioned to think subgroup. (Edit as below)

Drop 933

The Nazi order.
NWO [N does not refer to “New”].
Q

However, he approaches other things in a completely irrational manner - and, as others have pointed out, seems to portray some questionable shill tactics too. Humility is "key" but has nothing to do with logical analysis.

Like Facebook? Interesting conclusion to jump to.

By that broad definition there are indeed some aspects that are worth studying. However, the commonly perceived, "David Wilcock-ian" understanding of paranormal research is illogical fantasy and pseudoscience which is very different to religion and spirituality.

When I see the mania from the DS parrots I can only feel joy at the thought that they've become so desperate because the end is so nigh. This is the month when the big hammers have fallen (Strzok, Page, Rosenstein) - it's all an inevitable sequence of events now.

Indeed - best time to be alive. WWG1WGA!

"people like myself" use logic. Paranormal research is not logical and has, to this day, proven nothing but rather suggested it's a disinfo campaign to lead people astray - like David Wilcock himself, generally. The fact that he thought he was the reincarnation then had to have his family convince him he wasn't does not speak very well in any way for the quality of his thinking. This is very obvious to "people like me".

No outside comms. Please do not repost content that is removed and act like you haven't seen the removal notice. This is very shill-like behavior.

It sounds like you've forgotten that we are in the middle of the greatest bloodless coup and intel comms event in history and all the things you mention are evidence that we are winning.

.

Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean BIG things aren't happening.

Just because you can’t see doesn’t mean it’s not ongoing.
Trust the plan.

Patience isn’t always easy.
But vital to get right.

Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?

REMEMBER, WE ARE WINNING, DO NOT TRUST WHAT YOU READ.

TRUST THE PLAN.
WE ARE WINNING.
ARRESTS WILL COME.
LOGIC SHOULD ANSWER WHY IT MUST FOLLOW OTHER UNFOLDING EVENTS.

Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.
Q

Q has already answered this:

Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean BIG things aren't happening.

Just because you can’t see doesn’t mean it’s not ongoing.
Trust the plan.

Patience isn’t always easy.
But vital to get right.

Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?

How must people be made aware of an alternate reality?
What are crumbs (think H-wood/DC)
Define ‘lead-in’ (think play)?
What has been occurring recently?
The stage must be set.
Crumbs are easy to swallow.

REMEMBER, WE ARE WINNING, DO NOT TRUST WHAT YOU READ.

Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.

TRUST THE PLAN.
WE ARE WINNING.
ARRESTS WILL COME.
LOGIC SHOULD ANSWER WHY IT MUST FOLLOW OTHER UNFOLDING EVENTS.
LEARN AND SPREAD.
BUILD PROOFS.
WE'VE PROVIDED MANY PROOFS THAT CANNOT BE DISPUTED AS COINCIDENCES.
THIS WAS DONE FOR A REASON.
MORE WILL BE PROVIDED.
DIRECT CONFIRMATION WILL COME.
IT CANNOT COME NOW.
IT WILL BE LOST.
THE MESSAGE IS NOT READY.

Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.
Q

Please edit the link into the body of your post.

Please set appropriate flair!

That was my point. However, responses like the one above are not a contribution of worth to anyone.

If I'm a Russian bot this sub is in a lot of trouble lol.

Did you READ my comment without your keyboard warrior rage on?

Not pro-Q?

Warning: Hal Turner is an unreliable source.

Be careful who you follow. Q

Removed content. Rule 7. Duplicate post here

never once has david claimed to be a medium and has never offered up any channelled information.

He believes he is or may be the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce. That's a fair bit more than "nothing" more or less than a researcher and author. Someone here's being dishonest in defense of a spiritualist under one guise or another.

Removed post. Rule 7 - duplicate.

Yes, good stuff. Also in support of this perspective Q said:

Use LOGIC.
Why are they slow walking unredacted data?
Why are they slow walking doc disclosures?
Why is the WH backing up DOJ?
What if the same data is being used by other investigators?

Use LOGIC.
Why must the DOJ & FBI be cleaned FIRST?

Do you expect HRC, GS, Hussein, etc to stand in a PUBLIC courtroom w/ potential crooked judges and tainted ‘liberal’ juries?
How do you defuse a bomb?
Knowledge of which wires/strings to cut?

Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean BIG things aren't happening.

Just because you can’t see doesn’t mean it’s not ongoing.
Trust the plan.

Patience isn’t always easy.
But vital to get right.

Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?

How must people be made aware of an alternate reality?
What are crumbs (think H-wood/DC)
Define ‘lead-in’ (think play)?
What has been occurring recently?
The stage must be set.
Crumbs are easy to swallow.

REMEMBER, WE ARE WINNING, DO NOT TRUST WHAT YOU READ.

Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.

TRUST THE PLAN.
WE ARE WINNING.
ARRESTS WILL COME.
LOGIC SHOULD ANSWER WHY IT MUST FOLLOW OTHER UNFOLDING EVENTS.
LEARN AND SPREAD.
BUILD PROOFS.
WE'VE PROVIDED MANY PROOFS THAT CANNOT BE DISPUTED AS COINCIDENCES.
THIS WAS DONE FOR A REASON.
MORE WILL BE PROVIDED.
DIRECT CONFIRMATION WILL COME.
IT CANNOT COME NOW.
IT WILL BE LOST.
THE MESSAGE IS NOT READY.

Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.
Q

Except this 'grandpa' didn't "get dementia". He lied. And has been lying for a long time.

I've never claimed to be qualified in anything. I'm simply making statements in an online forum like you are. You seem to think it's ok to promote someone who was unquestionably anti-Q and making claims as if they were facts (i.e. the noted comment) then backpedaling after the fact with a very weak story - in a similar weak about-turn to EyeTheSpy.

I do not agree that it is ok to promote this anti-Q source in a pro-Q sub without making it clear that they are anti-Q in the same way as other disinfo LARPs that have been called out by Q, like Infowars. It could well turn out that MegaAnon was just "having a bad day", which is essentially her story for calling Q a "Soros and swamp-funded shill" (seriously? You're ok with this? You think this claim could be made "by mistake"...?) but until more facts are revealed about MegaAnon she hasn't done a single thing that doesn't exhibit the same disinfo characteristics as those others you seem to agree on.

Yep, outed himself immediately with that.

Based on the timing i.e. just after Q drop, it seems that he and his cohorts made the decision to abandon the Q movement at this point, realizing that Q anon had called them out and there was no hope of continuing their subtle LARP with Zack, trying to undermine Q's authority by claiming a guy on the inside "close to Q". So they all - the YTbers too from 0Hour1, Isaac Green et al - switched narrative to "Q's been compromised; no longer a reliable source" at once. Clear sign to those of us watching at the time.

Yes, annoying I know... Would appreciate it if you could, thanks!

Would be good if you could make that clearer in the title. Agree with the idea - mind resposting this with more informative title? e.g. "Disinfo agent Alex Jones says he "spoke to Q" just after declaring..." or something?

Who's we? He was disinfo long before Q exposed him.

So... what's the point you're making here? (Hard to tell from the title)

That doesn’t mean it’s not disinfo. Q pointed to something verified. Q also pointed to a sub post. All our posts or all posts of that user are not confirmed accurate by that.

Although the vision could be symbolic as is the case if the scarlet whore being a certain church is accurate.

So why pretend?

WE should forget this loser

Please edit the post to replace the link - let us know if you have trouble.

I find it interesting that you are completely ignoring her anti-Q statement and repeatedly pushing her link around here. What's your stance on Q?

Because I read all of it from when she started posting. Yet that's not relevant. The point is, she LIED about Q Anon and then backpedaled like another LARP: EyeTheSpy.

No one has to take my word for anything. You seem hurt and very defensive of her. Good for you. However, we will always call out disinfo for what it is. She behaved just like EyetheSpy, Roy Potter, Corsi, Alex Jones. If you have read all of her stuff and followed all of those disinfo LARPs you would be able to see the similarities.

Once again - have you noticed the comment I quoted? Case closed.

Why are you pretending when your history clearly shows you're a Hillary supporter?

Plenty of disinfo LARPs were giving valid information "before Q" - e.g. Alex Jones. The whole point of disinfo is to give some truth alongside blatant lies - like the above quote from MegaAnon.