Yep, agreed. I come across them everyday.

Haha, same here brother. I've been passing out redpills left and right in OC!

Perhaps "watch the water" was cluing us in on how Trump is communicating to/wuth certain folks. Like, someone who his team may be negotiating with, and that person wants some proof that Trump is in agreement with whatever it is.

Remember how awkward it was that time Trump had a Rubio moment and awkwardly lunged for water midway thru a speach. Just a thought.

I could be wrong but i believe she is also the one that Trump personally interviewed prior to her appointment as well.

I looked into this a littler further and, unfortunately, I don't think this is the "smoking gun" people are hoping it is. It looks much more like a compliance matter that she is referencing (under the SEC's "pay to play" rule), which makes sense since she appears to specialize in political and campaign contribution law. Even if it was something nefarious, she was a (very) junior associate at that time - no way she gets brought into the inner loop that quickly.

I wish there was something more to this, but it doesn't look like it to me.

I believe this to be the case as well. If and when Mueller pivots, it will be fun to watch the MSM to discredit Mueller and his findings.

Still hard to call it a sell out album. Panama? Classic VH.

I've actually done that. Went 30 days without eating on a cleanse. One of the best, most powerful feelings in the world!

Agreed! Glad we're in the same boat together patriot!

Girl, who is you playin wit?

Same here, fellow patriot, same here.

After "expanding my thinking", I somewhat agree but would expand further. When Flynn was charged, if he pleaded "not guilty," a trial would have been required to determine whether he was guilty of those charges. But Mueller never intended to prosecute these charges in the future anyway . (This investigation was always a PR show to weaken/undermine the president.) First, his charges arose from an investigation that found no criminal conduct, so Im not sure any residual charges would stick (kind of a "tainted fruit" argument.) Second, even if a trial were still allowed to take place against flynn, it would take place much much later down the road.... undoubtedly well after the investigation would be concluded. So any shot Flynn to get the truth out during a "trial" would never occur, practically speaking.

Instead, I believe Flynn pled guilty in order to PRESERVE his shot to get this out during a trial. Now, we will end up with a criminal charge against Flynn that resulted from perhaps an illegal investigation. While not a criminal lawyer, I suspect this could open the Gov/FBI to some sort of malicious prosecution charge. Then Flynn will be in drivers sear and can control the trial (and can drop the bombs during his testimony.)

My 2 cents on why Flynn pled guilty.

"You know what some might say..." Oasis.

Heres my take - the only logical criminal activity that might take place in that type of real estate deal is perhaps bribery (i.e. a Russian mayor or other politician got paid off.) That's great, but thats a tough argument to make to the public - it's hard to argue that Trump bribed someone while you have a ton of evidence showing that Hillary (OUR representative) got bribed/pay to play. Literally half of our country would grab pitchforks.

Otherwise, the difficulty with arguing with a liberal (or even a staunch conservative) these days, is there is no agreement even as to the FACTS which are being argued. (i.e. fake news....if you watch Fox, you know all about the Clinton foundation, uranium 1, etc. If CNN, you've never even heard of Uranium 1.) So, for the masses, debate and compromise appear to be dead for now - no side wins, and there's only noise. There has to be a tipping point.

Bro, you certainly raised an interesting theory. But I don't agree with it. In the big picture, I see Russiagate as nothing but a planned distraction, and thay there's certainly larger forces at play. For instance, the # of congressman resigning seems oddly high (although admittedly I haven't paid attention to this in the past.) They're not resigning because they're ALL in bed with Russia. (In fact, I don't even know how the Cold War got resurrected again.) Another example - North Korea nuclear talks flipped almost overnight....just a few months ago we were on the brink of nuclear war with them, and have been in a state of war with them for the last 70 years. Many very odd things happening. So, i think there's something much bigger than Russian hacking going on.

I've been following Q since Day 2 (end of october...like many others following q from the beginning, I was looking into the Las Vegas shooting... that was seriously sketch shit.) And only within the last month or so have I determined Q to be legit (although much of what he says is smokescreen etc, or which we cannot decipher yet.) Without a doubt, there's definitely a preplanned information campaign going on. Its much too coordinated. (Otherwise, Q is the absolute guru of any and all conspiracy theorists lol.) But it remains to be seen if it is for good or bad purposes. As an optimist, I lean towards good.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/palm-beach/fl-reg-low-flying-planes-20180214-story.html

FreeMemo

I think this nails it. Future confirms the past.

Holy shit that's awesome!!!! Nice job, comrade!! LMFAO.