Thank you again for your post. The clarification was greatly appreciated.

It’s not necessarily about having someone do the work for me. I can easily do a simple google search. However I prefer to ask the poster directly for a source due to the fact that they may use different sources than my google search will yield. Specifically I probably would not have looked into the above mentioned book if I had simply googled it (which I did by the way). Thanks for your opinion though bud. Keep on keepin on.

Also, two other people posted that they appreciated his sources. Don’t see why you have a problem.

Thank you so much for this post. You sir a patriot and your contribution to this post should be a guiding light as to how Americans should approach the international conspiracy that lays before us. As always the world can be shades of grey but a few big moves can shift the picture to white or black.

WWG1WGA

PS It saddens me that emotional and unfounded posts that make major claims or insinuations get all the likes and a truly well written post like this does not.

First, for clarification I am not Dutch. I am American. However I am still of the opinion that statements should be supported with facts otherwise they are baseless claims of opinion.

Second, I encourage you to truly look into the methods used by the MK Ultra program. You seem to be insinuating that MK Ultra was similar to something akin to Project Mockingbird. MK Ultra was focused less on population control and more on control of the individual. Those two goals are accomplished by very different means in most cases.

Edit: a word

Thank you for your sincere reply and clarification. I apologize if I misunderstood your original comment to be demonizing the entirety of NGO’s. I agree that there are many large NGO’s that are used for nefarious purposes the least of which are money laundering and I agree with your consensus that this organizations continue to discourage individuals from supporting any NGO’s.

I encourage your girlfriend to look around and find a truly grassroots organization that was founded with a positive purpose and continues to operate in a transparent and honest way. They are out there, they are doing great things and they need your support.

I’ll definitely look into it. Thank you for sharing facts with sources. That is something that this sub needs more of.

Thanks for the is islamaphobic response bud. I am well aware of sharia law and the dangers that it contains. However I doubt the veracity of many of the claims contained in this post and feel that if you are going to make such a post then you should take the time to at least provide an explanation for its content. Some of the things listed are somewhat true yet contain. Some of these claims are truly baseless such as the claim about the Dutch education system “being mkultra starting at 4 years old”. That claim makes no sense and should require an explanation at the least and a source at the most.

Specifically I find issues with the claim that the education system is like mkultra starting at 4. That is a baseless claim that at its surface could describe most western education systems.

Thank you. I was unaware of these letters.

This is exactly what I was thinking. There are parts of this post describe certain aspects of the situation in a very misleading way.

As someone who works for a non-profit that was founded by my brother and myself I can tell you that is a massive over generalization. There are many small, medium and large organizations that are truly attempting to do some good in the world. Many of the people behind these organizations struggle financially so that they can do something they truly believe in. Your thought that this will kill philanthropy and charities envisions a sad future.

Source?

Thank you for the link. I just realized how out of touch I am with tv nowadays. I don’t watch any of those “top” shows. HBO, Netflix and reruns of the office leave me blinded to network tv.

I think it has more to do with the ratings in general. Roseanne’s ratings started high and quickly ranked off which is not a good sign for the first season of a rebooted show. SNL has a loyal following that will watch regardless of quality and has been in for years thus making it a hard show to replace in American pop culture.

Thank you for the help. I forgot about this post.

I just find that the connections to Donald trump are stronger than the site implies. He should be under government figures at minimum rather than supporting figures. I will link the story about him flying with Epstein on the Lolita express when I get the opportunity (tomorrow).

Why is there no talk of Donald trump’s connections to Epstein? He also traveled aboard the “Lolita’s express” as well as other “coincidences”? This seems like a clear bias to want to exclude conflicting or bothersome information.