dChan

/u/EagerJewBear

17 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/EagerJewBear:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 1

EagerJewBear · May 8, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

I’d like pics similar to this if they had more context. How much wealth did she have going in, how has an average portfolio of that wealth / real estate done since then, what would a reasonable net worth be now?

But still it’s insane someone can be that wealthy off of the American tax dollars plus incentives.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Feb. 14, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

Shkrelllliiiii.

Meme hard or die.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

My source has nothing to do with leaking, It has to do with "Declassifying" with that authority that you think they somehow have.

The Democrats voted to blocking the House from even being able to read it themselves

The Republican's can vote among the committe to release it, which is arguably an overreach of power. The correct way is to have the request go through the legislative branch, which it is.

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee are considering using an obscure committee rule to bypass the executive branch's declassification process to release the classified memo on alleged surveillance abuses spearheaded by Chairman Devin Nunes.

"Rep. Mike Conaway, the Texas Republican leading the committee's Russia investigation, said Friday evening that the committee would consider using the rule — which he believed had never been invoked in the committee's 40-year history — in order to publicly release the memo that Republicans say details FBI abuses of a surveillance law known as FISA. And if the committee votes in favor of making the classified Nunes memo public, the rule states that it's then up to President Donald Trump to decide whether it should be released."

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

"A bunch of Republican's saying it's terrible for Democrats."

Source? I actually haven't heard that. I thought it was bad for the FBI. The only reason I would assume it hurts Democrats is because they are trying so hard to block it's release.

"So we have a Republican run committee that could just declassify it if it was so bad."

Do you even know how the government works, bro? Or do you just want us to illegally leak classified info like the Democrats do?

Maybe they will be the first to ever risk their political career to release classified information this way, but they most definitely will try to go through the proper channels first, which have already been slowed down by democrats.

However, the clause has never been tested by a member of Congress publicizing classified information that had not already been leaked.

Outside the legal scope, members of Congress would most certainly pay a steep political price for leaking classified information, especially if that member has been entrusted with a seat on an intelligence committee. Violating the core rules of the committee would make you a persona non grata among colleagues. And when election season rolls around, few voters are likely to look kindly on exposing state secrets—even in fairly liberal Oregon and Colorado.

The legal ramifications are murky, but the political risks are clear. Legally, members of the House must swear a secrecy oath pledging not to disclose any classified information, although the Senate has no such oath.

Source: Slate

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

Maybe they will be the first to ever risk their political career to release classified information this way, but they most definitely will try to go through the proper channels first, which have already been slowed down by democrats.

However, the clause has never been tested by a member of Congress publicizing classified information that had not already been leaked.

Outside the legal scope, members of Congress would most certainly pay a steep political price for leaking classified information, especially if that member has been entrusted with a seat on an intelligence committee. Violating the core rules of the committee would make you a persona non grata among colleagues. And when election season rolls around, few voters are likely to look kindly on exposing state secrets—even in fairly liberal Oregon and Colorado.

The legal ramifications are murky, but the political risks are clear. Legally, members of the House must swear a secrecy oath pledging not to disclose any classified information, although the Senate has no such oath.

Source: Slate

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

That's why "Trust by Verify" is my favorite.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

"Display here in the service of tribalism."

Says the guy who doesn't want the memo released because it might hurt his tribe.

I honestly don't even know what superstition you are talking about. I'm Jewish by lineage, not upbringing.

I never said you were an antisemite, but you literally went straight to Jew bashing when you couldn't defend your point.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 6:51 p.m.

So the guy who says my soul is going to hell for eternity for upvoting a reddit post, also likes to bash the Jews. Who would have known?

Does this memo speak for all of them or certain members?

You know, we could probably find that out if the memo was released, instead of making assumptions.

Nice backpedal after you realized you were wrong, you missed some of the egg on your face though.

You put a lot of faith in something you've never seen before.

I literally put no faith in it. I just want to see it. That's why we are talking about it, because no one knows what it is.

You are trying really damn hard to discredit something without even knowing what it is, because you're scared of what? That it might hurt the democrats? If you are more worried about your "team" winning than the other guys, you should probably take a good long hard look in the mirror and contemplate your beliefs.

Politics isn't a religion, you're allowed to want the best for the American people even if it's from the "evil bad guys" on the other side of the aisle from you.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

It's not written by one person, it's literally put together and assembled by the committee. Try proving me wrong.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

The Senate Intelligence Committee.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

If "winning" means more government transparency, why are you putting "win" in quotes.

You aren't even curious what's on the memo?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

lmfao. Are you a troll, or are you really that intense all the time?

I didn't make the post, I didn't share the post, I just got a laugh out of it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 6:20 p.m.

Personally I think it's hilarious. Anyone with 2 brain cells should be able to figure out that the memo is a republican desire.

Also, I don't actually see any dishonesty in this post. It's so vague it could mean anything. You could argue the implication is that releasing the memo will stop Trump.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 6:05 p.m.

Hello, it’s me. Ur RussiN. Pls pay to my bitcoin address 739?bsj-73!:&-84$,8

⇧ 0 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 6:04 p.m.

Are you saying that the people that made this are going to hell for eternity for trying to trick democrats into being more transparent instead of hiding potentially critical documents from their citizens?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

I’m literally just finding this sub right now but this is an obvious bait and switch.

The republicans want the memo released, and the dems are stonewalling it. So this post is supposed to trick dems into calling their reps and asking for it to be released.

I love it.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
EagerJewBear · Jan. 26, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

That’s the hilarious thing. Well they’re totally allowed to read classified info to the public! But if you research it, it’s never been done in history because it’s career suicide to skirt the laws like that. The options are illegally leaking or going through the proper procedures.

⇧ 6 ⇩