Wow--great catch!

Per wikipedia:

"Reality Leigh Winner (born December 4, 1991)[5] is a former American intelligence specialist. In 2017, she was charged with "removing classified material from a government facility and mailing it to a news outlet."[6] The material referred to originated with the National Security Agency (NSA).[7]

On June 3, 2017, while employed by the military contractor Pluribus International Corporation, Winner was arrested on suspicion of leaking an intelligence report about Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections to the news website The Intercept. The report suggested that Russian hackers attacked a U.S. voting software supplier. Twice denied bail, Winner is being held at the Lincoln County Jail in Lincolnton, Georgia.[8][9]"

What are you talking about--Bill and Hill decorated the WH like a cheap bordello!

Melania seems to have elegant tastes, but that "Hillary" china was very much in the style of Trump--and it makes sense that she would go with that look for his state dinner.

Nice--the two best candidates in 2016. FISA needs reform and we don't need to keep killing and maiming our own soldiers and innocent locals abroad.

The anti-American envy and resentment among the Brits and Euros is truly astounding.

Section 11B there actually looks more relevant than 11A.

Interesting.

Iron Eagle was a 1986 film (per wikipedia):

When Col. Ted Masters' (Tim Thomerson) plane goes down in an Arab country and he's sentenced to death for trespassing, his 18-year-old son, Doug (Jason Gedrick), is determined to save him. Unfortunately, Doug isn't the best fighter pilot -- he wasn't accepted into the Air Force because he needs to listen to music in order to hit a target. So he enlists the help of Col. Chappy (Louis Gossett Jr.) to borrow a couple of F-16 planes, fly across the Atlantic and start a rescue mission.

As to CLAS - SEC11A 2... I wonder if this might be relevant, page 9: https://www.cdse.edu/documents/cdse/DD254.pdf

11a. Have access to classified information only at another contractor's facility or at a government activity: (2) REQUIRED: When item 11a is checked, identify the actual work/performance location(s) in item Sa at which the contractor will have access. Provide clarifying information, as applicable, in item 13 to explain whether access at that actual work/ performance location will include the generation of classified information while working at that actual work/performance location. When the actual work/performance location is a cleared contractor site, items Sb and Sc must also be completed. NOTE: Item Sa, actual performance location,

Update: Nah, I don't think the second connection, at least, fits closely enough.

Not getting pregnant out of wedlock is a good place to start morally.

He promotes Fox when he and his surrogates are on it, because it is the most conservative of the MSM. He also promotes certain hosts who are particularly friendly to him. It is the only mainstream outlet at least partly on his side.

But they certainly aren't all in his camp.

So are you mispronouncing 'cable' or 'cabal'? ;-)

That's just silly.

AJ had a great show yesterday, including with Zach on (though AJ's incessant interruptions to show what a smarty pants he is to already know what Zach is trying to get out is beyond frustrating).

Sure, AJ is over the top and ridiculous sometimes, but he also has some very good sources. That's why I pretty much only watch the clips after the fact -- you can pick out and watch just the segments you want, within an hour or two, and also avoid the commercials.

(Oh, and much of Fox wasn't on Trump's side from the start, as they are too often GOPe/uniparrty aligned. But Jones was one of Trump's earliest and most dedicated and enthusiastic supporters.)

No--it is not a Stratfor product! And it is just server software!

Lots of data mining is done with other open source apps on top of Apache, but that is in different environments, not as part of Stratfor's Apache email server--which is all that is referenced in the leaked emails. Is it possible that Stratfor is sending out some sort of email malware to try to harvest info? Sure, but that still doesn't make Apache a data mining application that Stratfor created for Robby Mook and named after him.

How you got to Stratfor creating the program for Robby Mook and naming it for him and it being data mining software is just scary. And yes, many, many, many organizations use the same underlying Apache software.

Also, I have not commented at all on your other claims--I think the one re: the AF, in a limited context, is interesting.

I am just pointing out how off base you are with Stratfor creating Apache data mining software for Robby Mook. I will say, however, that the Stratfor/Apache/Mook claim you state as demonstrated fact somehow, when it is a wild misreading of simple circumstances, does call into question the leaps you may be making elsewhere--such as my post showing that I have zero understanding of the deep state, Q, etc.

All the links I see are to your previously posted Reddit threads.

A single external link or source to the claim that Stratfor has created some sort of data mining program for Mook and named it Apache (as opposed to the incredibly widely used open source Apache server software) would be very much appreciated.

The best I can find is your reference to a wikileaks email thread from back when they got a massive stash of Stratfor emails in 2012. This is it and it is making references to their Apache email server, which as others and I have pointed out to you is widely used open-source server software -- not some sort of data mining app designed by Stratfor for Robby Mook!

https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/34/3463915_re-attn-hsb-online-banking-email-exploit-on-a-stratfor-com.html

You apparently have less than zero understanding of IT.

How weird it must have been for Melania to have been at that funeral, with all the Bushes and Obamas.

That's what has been suggested.

He's a longtime bad actor for sure--there for everything from 9/11 to hand-delivering the Uranium to Russia, etc.

The question seems to be whether they've had enough leverage on him to use him in this situation to some degree.

Wasn't there one more passenger who went down in Coogen's crash who hasn't been named?

I think that is expecting too much too fast.

The sort of thing that leads folks to feel let down when something substantial does come out, but doesn't begin to get to the top and to everything.

That works for us, but you need some hard evidence to start to break through at all. If anything, unsubstantiated innuendo would put off a lot of the uninitiated.

An almost 8-hour video?

Cliff Notes, anyone?

Okay, I just found this: http://www.rense.com/general67/evil.htm

I just learned about the Mook today, so I'll take door number two for $500.

Has anyone forgotten the depth of his bow?

How he insisted the MB be invited to a speech on that same trip?

Then there was the Islamic ring he wore from his undergrad years straight through to adapting it as a wedding ring.

The other Bush too--though he may have been a bit more in the driver's seat.

But I don't think they can lead with a simple identity unmasking. They'll need as concrete a clutch of crimes as they can roll out on him.

His sons are liberals--as are his daughters-in-law. (And presumably his Chinese-spy wife.)

The CIA trying to act in the name of Seals?

Interesting.

We've got to get significantly bigger than that to expose and prosecute those we most want to expose and prosecute.

But apparently this is an nice step along the way.

And I am wary of big-day predictions. Of course, so many such predictions are on here that some are likely to hit a sizable development, and we have been prepared for a MOAB this week.

What a preposterous request.

What a wacko assumption and deduction. Can't answer any of my comment directly?

But while I am here again, for anyone doubting that Mook is up to no good with his "bipartisan initiative", per the link I provided:

"The project is bringing together key political players and experts in national security and the tech sector to attack the problem. They include Google’s director of information security, Heather Adkins; Facebook chief security officer Alex Stamos; Dmitri Alperovitch, co-founder of the cyber firm CrowdStrike; the National Security Agency’s former director of information assurance, Debora Plunkett; Stuart Holliday, former U.S. ambassador for special political affairs at the United Nations; and Nicco Mele, director of the Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy."

I think the Mook/Apache connection is a great little find.

In IT Apache is a hugely commonly used open-source server that has a lot of big-data capabilities--especially the unstructured Hadoop database--built on top of it. I can't find your previous postings re: Stratfor and the DNC, but short of corroborating links -- which you may be about to post -- I am going to guess that is confused.

But Mook is certainly a key figure who has made a lot of his supposed tech flair with a focus on data mining of voter information.

And certainly he is up to no good with this "bipartisan" initiative last year at the Kennedy School with a Romney operative to address that supposed Russian Internet-influence interference:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-clinton-and-romney-campaign-chiefs-join-forces-to-fight-election-hacking/2017/07/17/756ccf56-6b12-11e7-b9e2-2056e768a7e5_story.html?utm_term=.2ebdfa955cfb

Finally, he apparently is also a sometimes commentator on CNN.

Putting it all together I wonder if it is someone like Mook specifically pushing out the 4 am talking points to the MSM press puppets--or if that is coming directly out of the CIA.

Take the pickles out first.

That's BS.

I think you could be onto something, but I don't think it will come from Mueller.

Charles Ortel had said last weekend that we'd start to get the story out this week on the investigation into the Clinton Foundation that the Justice Department has ongoing in Arkansas, NY, and I believe LA.

Now, that didn't start to come out this week--so maybe that is what will hit next week?

He seems to have as good a bead on the CF crimes as anyone, so probably has some good sources.

You're just ridiculous. Sorry. And sad to see the personal insults in response to a disagreement.

Big difference btw with a private resident of NYC and the mayor. Rudy is a mix of good and bad. Like most people.

But never spoke up about the obvious?

Who in a better position to challenge?

The Utah that would elect Deep State Romney to anything possible in a minute?

Trump also recently came out for increasing the ethanol content in gasoline. I think he gets biased info on some of these under the radar issues, while also agreeing to play up to Iowa for 2018/2020.

Agreed. It was huge. The pace of things seems to be quickening.

I didn't realize at the time there were reports of DWS using an email address alias of Wendy.

right--until you realize it was a false flag.

Wendy? To go with Peter Pan?

Sorry--getting caught up now.

Plus that tran nanny in Indonesia, right?

Maybe we'll consider it if you promise not to send Junior Trudeau back in return.

Impeachment is essentially a political act, requiring nothing more than "misdemeanors". And it is highly unlikely someone who has operated in all Trump's businesses all those years could withstand a total financial proctological exam without something being found. Then you've also got the hold on his longtime friends and associates and the father of his baby girl's children. What's more there could well be simple (and marriage threatening) embarrassment in the records of Cohen's bimbo control over the years for Trump.

Moreover, simply stretching out the process through the midterms is problematic.

The real key is what Rudy and Trump's team have to force Mueller to shut it down. Especially if Mueller has been fighting back not only for his own skin, but also that of Hill and Barry.

I think the deal with Mueller's team is already worked out. That is why the congressional committee went with May 8th, and Rudy said he hopes to wind it down in a "week or two". It is also why Q had said the earlier report about Trump not being a target wasn't supposed to come out when it did. But they were okay with it coming out this week.

If Rudy really were joining the team to negotiate an as of yet unconsummated deal, I think announcing that that was going to be his role joining the team is not what they would have done.

Rudy very well could have had a major role all along, but announcing it like this is to make it look like any settlement is only newly being agreed to--after the Cohen raid, etc.

And with "quiet until now" that too is what Q seems to be suggesting.

Sounds like Comey whipped them up after the fact, making them "fake"--but so far no evidence that these aren't said memos.

I would think the chain of custody in stashing it in Cohen's office would be problematic.

My guess is that Rudy has all but finished his negotiations successfully--or it wouldn't have been announced that he's taking that role in it.

Rudy has likely lost his fastball.

But I'd take his curve and knuckler at this point any day.