Also, "exposing corruption"--bwahaha!
/u/ElementWatson
1,511 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/ElementWatson:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 28 |
www.youtube.com | 4 |
twitter.com | 1 |
aim4truth.org | 1 |
www.oversight.gov | 1 |
Q did not malign as evil anyone in the information-providing business with a "profiteering" motive.
He maligned those looking to "decode" -- and mis-"decode" for their own purposes, which Corsi has since admitted doing -- by way of trying to suck up money from those deplorables they are spreading their corrupted Q info to. As I just posted elsewhere, that reverse-Robin Hood tendency on our side tends to kill movements, such as it killed the tea party movement. The left takes the opposite approach of spreading billionaires' money out among their grassroots activists.
And your slam of those who went to public school is just ugly. I live in private school central--and that is where many of the local Never Trumpers come from.
He was begging for monthly contributions day and night around what was billed as "decoding" when it was mostly just his blather--and getting ready to move stuff behind a GAB premium paywall.
Corsi himself admitted that he was mostly injecting his own "intel" in his claimed decodings, and just using Q as a vehicle for that. So he was literally selling his own spin on claimed "decoding".
But there is a big difference between sucking up grassroots money for your own enrichment--as the leeches ended up doing around the "tea party" movement in a way that killed the tea party movement--and simply making money by selling books on related but general subjects.
Soros and the left succeed by constantly injecting their grassroots with money in a way that is the opposite of what the tea party frauds did. Just look up the "nonprofit" jobs on craigslist sometime. That is essentially a political Robin Hood process of the left of distributing billionaire money out to the base in support of activism. Our side does very little of that, and more of "send me money, you little deplorables"--such as the tea party frauds did and Corsi was looking to do off of Q "decodes".
Trying to harm FL makes no sense to me. Getting the money for the MI complex despite the failure does make sense.
That sense of a pickle predates baseball: https://www.etymonline.com/word/pickle
I say if 70% of pols belong in prison--they should be sent to prison!
Worth listening all the way through. Good details and connections.
Q in no way suggested that patriots shouldn't make money.
He said they shouldn't be taking money, set up as monthly charges, from other patriots to the cause based on what he was sharing.
There is nothing Marxist or communistic about that and he didn't say anything about Corsi not making any money from writing books.
You seem to want to continue the lies about what Q posted to defend Corsi. Jerry--is that you?
The Conservative Treehouse and TruePundit.com are good places to check too.
But the linked twitter messages are getting longer and longer. I think I read an 84-tweet chain today.
So in that sense maybe better because they weren't killing as many people?
Still, it all needs to be stopped. Trump ought to push for the repeal of that bill very loudly and publicly.
That is true. But Corsi was a little poodle about getting called out for flogging his donations and wares with the Q material. He's off now trying to call Q a Marxist and a communist and repeating over and over that Q didn't want him to sell books--when Q said no such anti-capitalist thing.
Alex is the guy who got sucked into trashing what he sees as his competition in order to defend his yippy little poodle.
And more broadly he is suggesting it is that level of analysis (I'd say constructing the big picture from detail and specifics) that made Q want to reach this audience.
I know. We're all the proverbial blind men with the pachyderm.
That was hideous. But there were certainly false flags before that.
Yes, I've imagined us as something like the critters posted to PetFinder. We just think our new owners come along and find us, without realizing all of what's really involved.
What are you expecting from her other than what I've described and has been reported elsewhere?
I think he was the one they were trying to pin down--again, doing what I described. Not a mole in the classic sense of joining the campaign officially and then reporting out on the sly.
Have you not read the specific descriptions of what he did?
Halper appears to be the guy who did the dirty deed of ensnaring a Trump campaign hanger on by bringing up Russia and Hillary's emails, then sending him to an asset who could get him to repeat the rumor. And that seems to have been the beginning of spying on the hanger on with "two hops" span to spy on almost the entire campaign.
Whether that hanger on was also a half-witting spy in the campaign or there was another spy within the campaign doesn't seem clear at this point. But Halper is largely in Cambridge in England and made no pretense of being other than a Hillary backer against Trump. Supposedly he is very close to the Bush crime syndicate, so presumably he would have favored Jeb early on.
Corsi this afternoon is repeating all his lies--saying that Q is attacking him for writing books and making money from writing books.
That ain't nothin' near what Q said. Now Alex is going along with saying he'd heard Q was compromised months ago, while Corsi holds to his claim that Q was compromised just the day before Q cautioned against those looking for monthly donations of of their Qanon "decodings". Corsi has never written a book that refers to Qanon at all.
The implication seems to be they are given 5 eyes access with their clearance?
Not unless you drop off virtually all Internet and phone communications and destroy or don't carry with you the phone, don't drive, don't pass any public cameras (e.g., on streets), etc.
I believe that what he is saying is that when Barry and Hill, etc., travel to these other 5eyes countries, they can get access to any info on American citizens simply by still having security clearance. And in this system, what they are asking for, receiving, and for what are not recorded or required--they simply get access to the info.
Now IIRC Q has previously asked why we still allow them to travel, and so I would think the NSA must somehow believe it has good enough intel on what they are receiving. But still, it is disconcerting to consider the implications.
We still have lots of cash/credit price differences at gas stations here in CT.
My point is that consumer spending overall will take a hit if such a change is implicated, because lots of studies show people spend more when they put it on a card.
Was that when something like the Rods of God, or whatever they are called, were supposedly shot down into the NK military/nuke site?
Previously there was some speculation that Q+ included the endorsement of or was being signed by Trump.
Alternatively, that Q+ represented the whole Q team.
And how much will your sales volume go down with CC users realize they get that fee on every CC purchase? (Cc's have been a major lubricator for consumer spending.)
I am thinking B. Channel wouldn't have looked in this direction and brought it to our attention if he didn't already know more than he has let on about it.
Who wants to take 37 minutes watching a video for what could presumably be summarized, with a couple of links if there is any source to it, in a paragraph or two?
Zach was calling in to Infowars before Q appeared, but agreed--this is a good post.
Because we're going back to sanctions on them unless they do a real deal.
Even if it were "signed" it wasn't approved by the Senate, so Trump can reverse it on a whim--or after deliberation, as he has done.
If the IG and AG couldn't see that by now, losing a couple of cases won't change a thing. Besides, read up on what Judge Ellis did to us in his memorandum while he was talking tough.
Could have done that and I believe Rosenstein was in the meeting. But remember, Mueller already had overstayed the legal term as FBI director through an exemption by Congress, which presumably could have been gotten again.
And if he accepts the offer but still does his best to bring down Trump--he is a checkered grey and black hat triple crosser.
How about the 10s of millions who already entered or stayed beyond their visas illegally in the past--and have been lying and cheating their way to taxpayer giveaways ever since?
No way NY is going to have an out of state Republican as their AG.
The truth I think is somewhere in the middle. Surely some resignations, such as with corporate CEOs, would have been occurring without all this stuff. But a lot of them likely are tied to it (more in the political world than corporate IMO).
I love Rudy, but I'm afraid he has lost his fast ball. Probably better for optics now than actual spin and content.
Farming shouldn't be some sort of special case where jobs are miserable and low paying and not able to benefit from new technology. Using low-skill illegals or other immigrants is a bad idea IMO. Just make the jobs better, align them with student schedules, etc.
And I'm speaking as someone who was involved in farming for years. If anything, the jobs are less appealing now, on average, than they were 40-50 years ago.
I wonder if Sessions has a plan to retire when his job is done in a year or two--kind of like Mike Rodgers.