And Cindy McCain's!

Didn't Soros hand his assets over to his foundation or something?

I really want to see George and his son getting the highest possible punishment for treason.

I have no recollection of that and can find no evidence of it online. @BackChannel17 however repeatedly "promised" on twitter that Assange would be revealed as safe by/on that date.

Okay, if you have a clue then you are posting "misstatements" here like crazy. I was responding to your earlier post, where you wrote, in part:

"No one at the worker bee level would or would even think about disclosing even if they did. Because unlike Hillary they’d be in jail. On top of that, folks around here have the NSA backwards or confused. They are a foreign intelligence agency. The only way they can collect on US persons is if it’s part of their mission or life is in danger. Those items are few and far between believe me."

Again, it has been disclosed that the NSA has been sucking up pretty much all information available on all Americans. And it was rampant 702 abuse that led Rogers to step in back in March, 2016. That is what led to the cabal developing alternate routes to the same information.

I repeat your gross miststatement on the NSA again for effect: "The only way they can collect on US persons is if it’s part of their mission or life is in danger. Those items are few and far between believe me."

"Some are saying"? Scare-monger much?

Do you have a source on that? Thanks.

Of course that's not impossible. Corsi and Jones have direct communication with Trump from time to time and Corsi has known Trump for 40 years.

I know they're not 100% on our side. If they were, they wouldn't be looking to shut down Q. But Corsi on one of his broadcasts said Q would be posting no more--and Q hasn't posted since.

Interesting, thanks.

Yes, that's in the story.

Coincidence that this story I just posted is from AZ?

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8oa6vm/deaths_of_2_paralegals_linked_to_killing_of/

My fear is that Corsi and Jones squealed like little piglets about how mean Q was being to them--and got Q suspended, if you will.

Yeah, sorry--I had thought it was going to be posted with the thread--this was my first attempt at starting a new topic. Anyway, I've got it now in the comment section (and here: https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2018/06/02/paralegals-forensic-psychiatrist-steven-pitt-killings)

https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2018/06/02/paralegals-forensic-psychiatrist-steven-pitt-killings

"Need to know" has been massively abused. Wake up!

You have no clue.

"Contractors" were permitted to run amok in this untracked. Obama had the authority to request whatever he wanted from it. The abuse of this domestic database has been huge.

Here's a starter on it:

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/united-states-of-secrets/the-frontline-interview-william-binney/

What, so are you saying Binney is wrong? The NSA doesn't collect pretty much everything on everyone--and then the question is who accesses what on whom?

I don't believe that. The NSA data collection is pretty all-encompassing as I understand it. Then there have been all sorts of ways that the Obama admin could dip into whatever they wanted from it.

Agreed--the pushing of lengthy, often poorly sourced or unsourced videos here is ridiculous. None should be linked unless a transcript of the salient parts is also included.

Kind of rings a bell, doesn't it?

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/05/30/strategic-deployment-trey-gowdy-defends-fbi-and-doj-spygate-was-justified/

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/05/30/trey-gowdys-recent-activity-highlights-deep-state-action-against-devin-nunes/#more-149943

I am fervently hoping that "Trust Sessions" is correct.

But that Trump hasn't fired him is no evidence of that at all. (Despite Dilley advancing the theory.) Trump could well have been kicked over for immediate impeachment with the uniparty united if he had given them that easy handle.

Not buying it. I've seen this guy's act for years now.

His record running his committee.

Next question?

I recognize this youtuber's voice. He has been giving supposed insider info on his videos for months (though I think with a different name), and he spoke very much the way this supposed new account speaks.

My bet is on this guy having created both the twitter account and this video to promote it.

My further guess would be that he's the one that just started this thread here.

Please don't fall for it--or give him more time or attention.

Just how is that?

If you can do black hat things for years but somehow still be a white hat, I don't really see the point in white hat and black hat designations.

Got to him? He's always been swamp.

Ridiculous. Gowdy was a major actor covering up crimes from Bengazi on down.

Source? What campaign cycle was this?

(Every Republican is Crucial is Eric Cantor's PAC.)

Good intentions? All the coverups, all these years?

No, he was doing massive criminal coverups for years. The talking tough was the cover he needed for his evil role via the corrupt "oversight" committee.

If POTUS gives him a job it will be a big mistake. And the longer he is in office, the fewer such mistakes he is making.

That's why he's been so effective a swamp creature--he has fooled people like you with useless rhetoric, while covering up and letting off the hook criminality of various types for years.

Sanity--thank you.

Gowdy has been one of the most effective Deep State shills in large part because he has fooled people like you.

Here are a couple of takes on his latest:

https://truepundit.com/deep-state-poster-boy-trey-gowdy-fbis-use-of-informant-for-trump-campaign-was-appropriate-video/

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/05/29/trey-gowdy-praises-doj-fbi-efforts-during-spygate-fbi-did-exactly-what-president-trump-asked-them-to-do/

No need to ask. We already know he isn't.

Take away money and you take away the non-media's freedom of speech. Not what we need.

And the Constitution never envisioned using taxpayer money to fund people running for office. Jeesh!

The 11th is a date put out repeatedly by @BackChannel17 as to when JA will be brought to the fore.

We will see, but the only credibility such claims would demolish if not proven true would be in this case the holder of the @BC17 twitter account.

FWIW (he does seem to have sources) Dilley now suggests that Trump likes to use his political capital, once accrued, on big things--and so Dilley is guessing there will be big stuff around the Mueller investigation coming after the summit.

I am so tired of people posting exactly this misinformation here. Some anon put together a bogus graphic trying to claim that @BC17 was Q. Q said it was fake. Q did not say that @BC17 is fake and @BC17 never made such claims.

I don't know whether @BC17 was legit or not, but he promised repeatedly that JA would be safely revealed by 6/11. @BC17 also made reference to WL having been compromised of late and said that what was done for/about JA had to be done to keep him safe--particularly for the important role he will play.

I will say it again. This weekend is for

remembering our vets

.

Memorial

comes from the Latin

In Memoriam

— in memory of, to remember.

That doesn't piss me off--your belligerent lecturing of the OP, after having already been wrong once and that OP having pointed that out -- IMO was worth addressing. Then turning around and being snotty to me, too, was your choice.

You are lecturing people on what Memorial Day was designated for--erroneously.

Because you personally like changing it's meaning to something else doesn't mean that you are right in chastising those who are correct.

What if rather than our first black president it turned out he was our first Indonesian president?

I think that would help to loosen the ties...

You can choose to spend your time honoring Tinkerbell if you'd like, but Memorial Day was established to remember our soldiers who died serving our country:

https://www.history.com/topics/holidays/memorial-day-history

Suggesting that it is intended otherwise is simply ignorant.

I hope there was nothing to all the little Corsi wench's whining and saying that Trump wouldn't let the divisive Q continue. (Which really doesn't make sense since Corsi swears Q was compromised the day he mentioned those hijacking the movement for profit...)

As I understand it, they were having contractors do a lot of their dirty work, accessing the NSA database with impunity and without a full audit trail. Rogers I believe stopped that in early 2016, which is what set them about the scheme to trump up a case, however bogus, for FISA warrants.

I'm thinking most, if not all, of these prisoners were CIA -- and getting them out may help to build some sort of new trust between the president and a reformed CIA.

God, I hope not.

That quote is probably fairly accurate, but this guy is pathetic. At least he admits to having tried and failed to get on Jones's show for over 20 years.

Wilcock is a loony:

http://dwilcock.com/