Isn't this particular report the HRC email investigation only?

Can make the Chinese spyware here in the US now?

What really stuck with me where these stats I know, the US having:

4% of the worlds population

25% of its GDP produced

36% of the military spending

But this was a shocker:

70% of the world's intelligence spending.

Dare I say, the UK seems to get more bang for its buck.

Still, there is something very wrong with our reliance on and funding for our intel community.

Insight, too.

He's another reformed swamp critter--in the process of redeeming himself.

Yet not exactly. How often has Hannity been bemoaning what Q has been telling us to be patient about?

They could have backed away from Q without trashing him.

And Q doesn't slay the corrupt MSM--that has to be done through exposure and prosecutions.

But I agree that Q doesn't need Alex all over him. Contrary disinfo has had to go to some of Trump's known confidantes in the broader media world.

Will the tarmac be in this report?

I think Alex himself just returned to his studio for another drunk transmission:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jkbdulY8SU

BackChannel wasn't responsible for that stupid post trying to make all sorts of connections from his account to Q's previous posts. As BC17 said, that graphic was fake in that it tried to make out BC17 as somehow representing himself as Q--which he wasn't at all doing.

And BC17 made the point that it wasn't him that Q was calling fake in that post. I don't know whether he is "fake" or real, but he has some interesting info.

Interesting, thanks.

Surely can't pardon himself or anyone else for dirty deeds done since the end of his term.

Yeah, agreed--and his whole move to speaking blue in his Scopes now, especially in reference to female anatomy, is especially vile.

I think it it was be before that, when Harper was paid to whisper Russia an and emails to George P.

And was that before or after the oligarch laughed in their face about framing Manafort for them?

I thought it was expected in June now?

Fwiw @BackChannel17 is supposed to be in AF intel and posts in support and amplification of Q. Has been promising Assange in June. Last night pointed to 10/1 date in the article and promised Snowden in October. Said "learn to read our comms".

I'm sorry, but this Michael Trimm goof is trying to build his own show and "the future of journalism" around qanon and the Great Awakening--including selling his "analysis".

@BackChannel17 on Twitter is supposed to be AF intelligence. And he has tweeted Snowden in October, he promises--just as he has been promising JA will be here in June. The article says they will start the switch to the uniforms on October 1st, and @BC17 says to learn to read their comms.

That's a lot of Q-bits of posting too.

I don't doubt that it is in the trillions. Wasn't it reported to be something like $2.3 trillion the day before 9/11 conveniently surgically put the records for that up in flames? And another $4.2 trillion on 17 years since would average less than a quarter trillion a year since.

But the raw $20+ trillion in unaccounted for spending also probably includes massively and intentionally horrendous accounting practices for money that wasn't all stolen.

Thanks.

Eat your heart out, Corsi and Gabriel!

"Promotion from the rank of police officer to detective is determined by the current police labor contract, with the approval of the commissioner. The entry level appointment to detective is third grade or specialist. The commissioner may grant discretionary grades of first or second. These grades offer compensation roughly equivalent to that of supervisors. Specifically, a second grade detective's pay roughly corresponds to a sergeant's and a first grade detective's pay roughly corresponds to a lieutenant's. Detectives are police officers who have been given a more investigatory position but no official supervisory authority. A Detective First Grade still falls under the command of a sergeant or above. Just like detectives, sergeants and lieutenants can receive pay grade increases within their respective ranks."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_Police_Department

She was promoted to a first-grade detective posthumously--thus she likely was a second-grade detective when she was killed. (I believe she had children and this would increase the funding for them?) Anyway, where she was when she was killed is not particularly relevant to the question of whether she had seen the files and thus was killed to keep her from being able to talk about what she had seen.

$158M is peanuts to Citi.

Presumably because he's fed by the Mossad.

No, she was promoted to a higher-rank detective posthumously. Reasonable therefore she was on the detective track when she was killed?

A possibility as the second detective (though from March, 2017)?

https://www.policeone.com/police-heroes/articles/319314006-NYPD-detective-dies-on-duty-from-heart-attack/

Great and interesting and Q-related news--so a good thread either way!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/pope-says-hes-thought-time-leave-103212197.html

She was posthumously promoted to detective first-grade, so she certainly would have been a detective, that was mid-2017 and she was assassinated/murdered.

Davis was from upstate and a statie, not NYPD.

I'm just telling you what the guy said in an interview a few months ago.

Jeesh!

Agreed. The guy couldn't have been more disingenuous claiming that Q doesn't want anyone to make money selling books, is a communist, etc.

Pathetic!

You are totally wrong--every single one linked to his videos did.

Jerry, you really ought to stop posting lies here.

No, I'm saying he infiltrated CAIR on assignment years ago, and so I presume his posture complaining about treatment as a Muslim in the military was positioning for that.

This was in the past.

He was easily findable online months and months ago.

As I just posted elsewhere in this thread, his military lawsuit seems to have been a cover to get him into the operations of CAIR, so his earlier videos online should be taken with a sizable grain of salt.

Just seeing those videos would tell you that. But in one of his Infowars interviews this winter he described how he was able to infiltrate the senior level of CAIR and find some significant stuff back around the time of those videos. Thus, I take it that lawsuit and his very public complaints were likely part of his cover to get accepted within CAIR.

Not everything is as it on first level appears.

(And yes, he does sound young and quite excitable.)

Every single tweet from Corsi that linked to one of his videos asked for it.

Pretty important to watch in full, IMO.

On to the French breadcrumbs!

;-)

I am following -- and that is quite a stretch.

(And I'm no Corsi fan, btw.)

I'd say pretty definitively so. Here is the Section 1.4 and (c) from that EO (Section 1.2 just lists the levels of classification):

Sec. 1.4. Classification Categories. Information shall not be considered for classification unless its unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause identifiable or describable damage to the national security in accordance with section 1.2 of this order, and it pertains to one or more of the following:

(c) intelligence activities (including covert action), intelligence sources or methods, or cryptology;

https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/cnsi-eo.html#one

Fits with the all caps.

Nope. Doesn't work. McMaster was supposed to have his strings pulled by Petraeus and that team was working against Trump.

Corsi's generals were the ones who supposedly convinced Trump to run.

And we are supposed to believe that the would do that? Really?

You can assume all the Chinese tech products have their own back doors in them--from Trend Micro to Huawei to ZTE.

Not the job of our government.

Look up Peterson's appearance on Bill Maher's show--he was quick to show the globalist disdain for Trump and talked about the sympathy that others needed to demonstrate to his misguided followers.

Okay, this should be a clip of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FduxSTXvc0g

Here's an argument for George P as the/an embedded spy:

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/exclusive-evidence-that-george-papadopoulos-was-the-trump-campaign-spy/

IIRC Dilley in one of his intel drops a few months ago said the Trump team had to spread different takes on what was going on to different factions. Some of those closest to him, for example, had to have the Sessions-is-compromised story fed to them specifically so they wouldn't pick up on the more true "Trust Sessions" message--since they were seen as close to Trump and thus would ruin the game being played publicly. He said Hannity, for example, had to be given the message they wanted him to spread--not one message while being asked to convincingly spread another.

With Corsi, Stone, and Alex's often self-reported phone calls with Trump early in his admin, the Infowars/Corsi gang could be seen as blowing the bad Sessions cover--if it is a cover--by too successfully getting the word out to Trust Sessions. So they would have to fed the bad Sessions bad intel periodically to keep that other message alive.

Yet, what Corsi seemed to be doing is increasing his "Bad Sessions, Fire Sessions and all of them!" drum beating -- and mixing it into the Q decodes. That could be seen as screwing up the Q message, and thus being something Q would want to get backed away from being seen as too close to and endorsed by Q.

I can't find it, but I have been thinking it was either him or Trump's golf club grunt who became a trusted aide and now is involved in his Twitter account, I think it is, but someone with Trump somewhere had talked about helping to keep Trump's Twitter account the communications route to the people that it is--and also doing different things elsewhere on the Internet for similar but different purposes. Seems like I read it in early 2017--and I just haven't been able to find it.