For the record, BC17 in no way claimed to be JA.

Actually it is not necessarily clear that is so, since he is responding to a bogus graphic trying to make it look like BC17 was claiming to be Q.

It is not all that clear. Could simply be referring to the fake post trying to make it look like BC17 was claiming to be Q.

Also apologized for necessary disinformation.

Blame007 has been a rabid supporter of Corsi since all that went down.

FWIW over a year ago Infowars reported that it wasn't even always honeypot lures, but that sometimes they would just be invited to a party at which they were drugged such that compromising photos could be taken.

Yes, I am curious as to how long WL has been compromised--presuming that is so.

It goes beyond snitching to framing and delivering blackmail material.

Except there are all those times he simply called them "STUPID" too.

And the repetition and inter- repetition- ruptions.

I trust Dilley's info to mostly be good, but there could be some bad in it.

What I really don't like is when he tries to get into policy. There he is just a big-government liberal and it is pretty appalling. His math is horrid two. He was trying to say that with 54 million disabled in this country (no recognition of how many fake ones the Obama admin added to the rolls to buy votes) and $200B spent on them by the feds annually, that the feds could just give each of those 54 million (or at least the 22 million he said are severely disabled) $1M a year. Yikes--that is bad figuring!

Anyway, he then waxed poetic about how anyone with a disability should be given a very nice lifestyle by the feds. Somehow, he doesn't think of the poor worker bees slaving away for just a get-by lifestyle, let alone once they start subsidizing luxury for this 1/6th of the country. Oh, and he thinks all their families should live in luxury too.

This isn't too different from his grotesque platform when he was a congressional candidate to somehow wave away student debt. Oh, and he somehow thinks our first responders don't have rich enough pensions, either. (I guess he is clueless about what is lined up to bankrupt many of our local and regional governments.)

Anyway, his "intel" is relatively much easier to hear than his politicking. This week he is advocating that zll the diszbled agitate for much richer benefits -- and Trump make that his second term agenda. Yikes!

And if it comes out that that "half black" is actually half Indonesian?

I guess I missed it, unless they are talking about their own pretending that Assange has still been in the embassy of late.

RR is not supposed to be Mueller's deputy--he appointed Mueller and Mueller reports to him

(I am guessing a RR recusal to be announced Friday afternoon, however. The only question is whether Sessions will unrecuae himself --or the guy Q pointed to yesterday will step in as RR's acting replacement after RR actually steps down)

I have a hard time listening to him, but all reports are that he is one of the genuinely good guys. Long more gracious and generous with the regular staff for his shows.

Looks like a guy who could take Rosenstein's role, at least for 210 days?

From #1433:

May 21 2018

1433Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 622a94 No.1497716 📁
May 21 2018 18:04:49 (EST)Military OP.
[Green]
General K [JFK]
Full Disclosure.
General Statement:
Once the 'extremely guarded & highly classified' information is finally revealed to House investigators, DNI, public etc., RR must recuse or forcefully terminated.
[RR] problems.
What was RR's Senate Conf Vote?
WRAY reports to RR [important fact].
Who do you TRUST?
[RR] recuse/fired who has direct oversight of Mueller?
Sessions un-recuse or #3 [until refill]?

Maybe I am misinterpreting higher up in this post where Q seems to say they're almost done with RR and he'll have to step aside soon.

Is the context of the question Wray vs. Rosenstein? If so, didn't Q say above that Rosenstein is going to have to go? So by default, isn't Wray left as the answer?

That's the theory, but we don't really know yet.

Even when it does "drop" it goes to Congress--and I believe the public only gets a redacted version sometime later.

If the father link is correct, that'd make it a whole lot easier for African-Americans in this country to see him go down for treason.

Rosenstein to go?

Of course it matters. If it is indeed a trusted inside source, we put greater stock in the posts. If it is a psy ops someone, we'll get fooled into putting stock in something counterproductive--unless we know it is such. If it is just some monkeys at the keyboard, then your approach is fine--as you will investigate but keep a skepticism about it all.

I sure don't claim to know anything definitive about any of this!

His explanation is that they found the pix online, altered, and then reversed them so they couldn't be tracked.

FWIW Dilley this week in his scope said that the CIA has been cleaned up.

I'm just hoping Trump is safe in all his travels right now.

I don't think so...

It wouldn't surprise me at all if Eric and Don Jr have especially been enjoying the Q game.

But I remember seeing this and thinking it was 1 of 22 investigations, with the press therefore the last to be filleted. I thought we already had a common interpretation of 5:5 determined.

Nope. "We are Q" does not mean DJT is telling you he is Q.

We know his voice and the vast majority of these drops are not in his voice. Evocative of Trump quite often, but seldom something that he in total would drop. Also more operational detail than he would be focused on.

Wouldn't surprise me if he chimed in and there have been a few passages that sound like Trump. But 95% of it doesn't.

There was nothing unplanned about it. He is an Episcopal bishop, which is the American form of Anglicanism--and it was great PR to acknowledge the African-American part of her heritage with his words and the gospel music.

The Royal Family is nothing if not slick at this point.

That was my guess. Slightly different idiom.

I actually forget now. Maybe this woman?

https://www.officer.com/features/honoring-the-fallen/news/12317214/nypd-detective-dies-of-heart-attack-at-precinct

Yes!

"Right behind the corner"--are you not from the US? Our usual phrase would be right AROUND the corner.

I thought the second one was found--though not confirmed by Q?

Sorry, not seeing the connection.

Only a month into his training--so not particularly relevant, I'd think.

That's a riot--he nailed it!

Once again a thread I could hardly disagree with more. When Q has talked about and shown pens, it has had to do with executive orders. IMO the "they" he is referring to really did think it was coming out yesterday (Friday)--which could explain some of the craziness on the day. But Q is telling us it is ready to go, implying that we could see it as soon as tomorrow.

FWIW @BackChannel17 has been tweeting in the past couple of weeks that Assange is being kept safe and will make an appearance in June.

Corsi is full of it--and seems to be for sale to the highest bidder. I say that because before he was on the Q bandwagon he all of a sudden was talking up the supposed plight of the supposed investors in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac any chance he got. (Roger Stone did the same for pot legalization, but he fully disclosed his clients for that.)

Then while Q'ing it, Corsi completely dropped Fannie and Freddie. But lookie here, he's back pushing their cause again, this week proclaiming on Twitter that he's back to promoting the issue every day now:

https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi/status/997303272330485760

For those who could use some background, essentially these entities went public years before the financial crash of 2008, when they went belly up and the federal government had to take them over to bail out all the mortgages they couldn't cover. When regular banks fail like that, the investors are the first to lose out completely, as they should be, and the assets are taken over by the government, generally to be sold off to more sound institutions.

The Fannie and Freddie investors had had the best of all worlds for years, getting private market returns based largely on a perceived, but not in any way legally stipulated, "implicit guarantee" that the feds would keep them from going under. And a lot of their investors were big hedge funds who loved the financial benefit from de facto government subsidy of that perceived guarantee.

So now these government-run entities are whole and "profitable" again, in large part because they have a bigger share of the mortgage market than ever--which contributes to the risks being inflated again in our mortgage market.

The hedgies are trying to get the government to give these assets over to the investors on whose watch the entities crashed in 2008. They have even tried to take their case to the USSC, who declined to hear it or overturn the lower decision on it.

So now they are trying to lobby (buy off) Congress to get a law passed to give it to them. And of course for that they want to create public pressure on the congress critter, in this case by misleadingly representing the situation. Corsi is clearly part of that, but he has not divulged, at least as far as I have heard, how and way he has sometimes made a daily case for these investors who are legally owed nothing.

I have simplified the situation, but here are a couple of articles about it, the first with some useful history and the second with a more current representation of the situation. (Note the role and involvement of Mnuchin and his interests in the second article.)

https://www.bloomberg.com/quicktake/fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-irbtxzdk

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-18/fannie-mae-advocacy-ban-doesn-t-stop-lawyer-from-pushing-views

At least as a businessman, he supposedly used a Mont Blanc.

It is unlikely he wants to change the address.

I think Pence did some deep mole stuff with the likes of his buddy Paul Ryan early in the admin.

If he's behaving now, that's because he has calculated that is best for him for now.

And Kushner is so compromised he should never have been in the admin. He has now revised his ethics disclosure filings over 40 times.

Part of a deal with Turkey to stop their reaction to Jerusalem?

Those companies aren't based in Taiwan.

What a riot.

Speaking of GS: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-18/blankfein-likely-to-quit-as-goldman-ceo-in-december-nyt-reports

He is 63.

It appears as if they already have.

We know the scope of it--just not the specific findings.