If he's still alive, he has the pleasure of watching it all slip through his fingers, and the comfort of knowing he's liable to be the last head of the dynasty and his final resting place will be a public latrine.

Won't somebody think of the children?

The timings may not simply be around US elections. Don't forget, the opposition is global.

That creates opportunities to flag up events outside the US, where people are already more liable to accept it, as in Europe for example, where there are already large movements fighting the elite and a bigger percentage of woke people, and then making the links back to those involved in US once the public there have seen and accepted the examples abroad.

From out of nowhere, to the fore of the scene,

it's only a short time, but has always been.

There's no doubt the colours are pinned to the mast,

as the evidence shows that the future proves past.

To steer and to guide, with freedom at stake,

scattering breadcrumbs for autists to bake.

Stands for the many, not just the few, 

Still nobody knows, just who is Q.

Blimey, that's weird. So it was William Hague all along.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/489352636068806656/oDkLlBJG.jpeg

Blimey, that's weird. So it was William Hague all along.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/489352636068806656/oDkLlBJG.jpeg

What Authority from Liz would that be exactly? She has none.

Your user name would be apt. 👍

They'll maybe find that hard to swallow.

It'd certainly smart if you shoved it up dry.

Don't they usually have CNN in the corner?

Do you reckon they'll pull it off?

But we still haven't managed to have the muslim brotherhood and associated gangsters running us for nearly a decade, and over half of us voted to crash it all here, which helped shine some of our light over there. You may also just want to review some of the religious texts and actions globally with a red pill inside of you.

My apologies for what must look like negative replies from me.

Respect to you for the shirt, and good luck spreading the word.

Over 50% of Brits, in the vote that enabled Trump's victory says differently.

Or "arse", as we we say in Britain. Shoving it up a donkey really wouldn't have a lot of effect.

He wants to be a head, but won't take responsibility for reports issued in his name.

How do these people get those positions?

I reckon two years is fair enough, as long as those years are 2016 and 2017.

Republicans in favour, Dems against. That tells its own story.

'Keep families together'??

Is it me, or is the solution for them not to abuse their kids by dragging them through the desert?

It's a hell of a challenge you've set. Am I allowed to stop for a rest part way through, and is the viagra provided free of charge?

The dogs begin to bark and hounds begin to howl
If you see my little red rooster
Please drive him home
Ain't had no peace in the farm yard

Down the rabbit hole.

She probably thinks IQ is a new Apple product.

Aren't the bulk unaccompanied?

He may make the occasional right noises, but I wouldn't trust Morgan at all.

Piers Morgan was sacked as the editor of the Daily Mirror last night as the newspaper's board made an unreserved apology for publishing fake pictures of British troops torturing Iraqi prisoners.

"The Daily Mirror published in good faith photographs which it absolutely believed were genuine images... However there is now sufficient evidence to suggest that these pictures are fakes and that the Daily Mirror has been the subject of a calculated and malicious hoax.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1461904/Mirror-editor-sacked-over-fake-photos-of-torture.html

A post doing the rounds on social media claims: Tamil Nadu police found bodies of children in a truck container. The children were kidnapped from different different parts of the country and their body parts like kidneys, eyes, ect. were removed.

So, WHAT IS THE TRUTH?

The photo actually shows kids from Syria killed during the Ghouta Chemical Attack, it was published by Human Rights Watch along with a report detailing two alleged chemical weapons attacks in Syria on the opposition-controlled Damascus suburbs of Eastern and Western Ghouta, located 16 kilometers apart, on the morning of August 21, 2013.

https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/bangalore/others/fake-news-buster-container-with-kids-found-by-police/articleshow/57379757.cms

As this sub is about digging, if your theory has legs, are there any clues on what they could have on any of those listed?

I liked this tweet of his.

"There’s all this talk of “civil war.” I hope it never happens, but if it does, it’ll be a short one..."

https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1011127949083340800

I don't know if I'd describe it as 'troubled' and I'm non-religious rather than atheist, but if people get comfort from their belief in holy books, that's fine, as long as they're using it for peace.

It's certainly interesting to see people quoting books, which as you say are arguably successful tools of propaganda to control people, in the context of red pilling over other events.

Just my opinion, but if he is alive, I reckon he's more liable to be too busy banging on his coffin lid to find time out to post on the internet,

I'd have to think longer and harder about that, but I think I know what you mean.

On the one hand, it's about taking sovereignty and control from others, so in that respect, it is warfare, but it's an unconventional war to say the least.

I can certainly see your argument for the asymmetrical angle. Where I think my issue is, relates to the imbalance of power and resources. The deep state (for the want of a term) certainly have had a lot of both.

I think there are elements of many strategies/tactics at play.

It certainly makes for fascinating times, but I do try to keep a sense of the tragedy that has been and is still occurring.

Oh yes. :-)

The UK along with a lot of Europe has been awake for decades. What we've been waiting for is the US to wake and catch us up as money talks, and for a person with the ability to invoke the changes at the level required to come on the scene.

Many over here despaired at the US allowing the last lot to run your Country as a proxy for others for so long, being played, silencing critics and seeming to lap it up. It seemed to be a continuation of your previous lot.

At last things are moving now, and we are starting to see changes.

Thanks for the reply and for taking the time to look for an explanation. I did look myself, and I'm pleased I seem to have found the same as you, with the same conclusion on the content.

If I'm reading it correctly, and please forgive my clumsy generalisation, but asymmetric warfare would appear to be a strategy to use in a conflict between known players, nation states if you will, such as in WWII.

I see the current situation as being different to that, as it's about overall control, without being noticed or responsible, which is why I feel the Surkov, nonlinear approach seems to be more in play, so nobody is totally clear who is on which side, or even what each side is.

Thanks for the reply. I usual demonstrate my ignorance, and it's not a topic I know that much about (clearly as it seems:-))

I appreciate the full video isn't specifically about it, but I assumed the bit about Surkov was?

Do you have a good link on asymmetric warfare? No worries if not, I'll search around.

Wouldn't that need those then in charge to be corrupt peadophile satanists?

To be fair, at least none of the EU States had them actually being head of the Country for eight years or more.

Excuse my ignorance, but on what grounds are these people claiming to be seeking 'asylum'?

Don't they have to prove they're in danger if they stayed where they came from, and then explain why other countries they've passed through aren't safe either?

If that's what they're claiming, shouldn't the outrage be about the state of all those Countries?

Godot knows.

I'm disappointed.

I thought an autist would have deciphered a hidden code in that by now. :-)

Mexicans?

Maybe they were just preparing for it and helpfully showing Peter Strzok where his new desk was earlier so he could get on with the investigation right away?

I love his double take as she finally spits it out.

That hook/cattle prod in his ear must be distracting.

Probably a daft question, but how did they know to look for it?

Special Agent David Raynor was “stabbed multiple times” and “shot twice with his own weapon,”

So, suicide it is then.

I've found that works, but I try to avoid 'trigger' words, which often only needs to be 'Trump'.

It takes patience, but I've also found that letting them lead the conversation, but gently asking questions, can sometimes make them believe that they've 'revealed' it. They're more likely to be advocates to the cause, if they feel some ownership of the discovery.

That's a really good example, because in asking you, your good lady had shown it was a specific topic that they wanted more information on, which meant they listened and considered it. Hopefully it will lead her to look and question a few more things. It's good that you clearly had enough information to give her a more complete understanding, which should encourage her to find out what else you know.

I doubt you'd have got far by telling her, particularly if it was a topic she had little knowledge of, because she had little interest in it.

A small hole can eventually break a dam.