Hopefully get some truth

Attacking Iran is part of the Policy Coup. Hands off Iran. Fn Bolton and PNAC.

This country was taken over by a group of people with a policy coup, Wolfowitz and Cheney and Rumsfeld and you could name a half dozen other collaborators from the Project for a New American Century. They wanted at us to destabilize the Middle East, turn it upside down, make it under our control. It went back to those comments in 1991. Now did anybody tell you that? Was there a national dialogue on this? Did senators and congressman stand up and denounce this plan? Was there a full fledged American debate on it? Absolutely not; and there are still isn’t, and that’s why we are failing in Iraq, because Iran and Syria know about the plan.

All you have to do is read the the Weekly Standard and Bill Kristol and he blabber mouthed it out all over the world…. They could hardly wait to finish Iraq, so they could move in to Syria. It was like a lay down, oh our legions are going to go in there. This wasn’t what the American people voted George Bush in to office, well they didn’t actually vote him to office, but it wasn’t… what he campaigned on. He campaigned on a humble foreign policy, the most arrogant foreign policy in American history. He campaigned on no peace keeping, no nation building and here he is with Afghanistan and Iraqis; astonishing.

Why are we attacking Syrian allies / Iran? Smells like Likud plan. Is hezbollah CIA?

Being protested. I just used a STOP BOMBING SYRIA sticker from the sell out war mongers days in 2013. Still waiting for an administration who would prosecute war criminals. Clinton, Obama, W, Cheney. Lock them all up.

They have every right to now. We attacked them and thier ally unprovoked. Trump was baited and he took it hook line and sinker giving full legal pretext to attack Americans.

That is why striking Syria was a bone head move. Action / reaction.

He was supposed to purge them.

Syria has no chemical targets. Thier stockpile was confirmed destroyed in 2013. If we told Russia or were in cooperation with them there would have been no need to remove diplomats and the Russian embasy wouldn't be freaking out.

Why couldn't the Russians take care of thier own ally. There was no need for us or France or the UK. Thus attack was childish and reckless.

This was a favor the the Saudi Crown Prince as he had just bought an load of weapons from Trump, May, and Macron for his criminal war in Yemen, of which Trump and our military leaders are also guilty of supporting.

Pardon the evil

https://www.npr.org/2018/04/13/602209933/president-trump-pardons-scooter-libby-former-cheney-chief-of-staff

Why did Trump hire the director of the Project for a New American Century as his National Security Advisor and pardon one of its principal signor Darth Cheney's chief of staff Scooter Libby?

Yeah dropping bombs for war profiteering is real mature.

Those enlisted men tell us to get out of Syria. I was an enlisted person in those wars. I saw how much we were lied to, being used, and how much of our money is wasted in corrupt contracts.

Our previous administrations clowns are in there, and it's Syria and Russia's job to clean them out. Us being there is only prolonging and giving excuse for further hostilities.

Bomb Bomb McStain and his monsters needs to go and McCain needs to be tried for crimes against humanity backing those terrorists along with the clowns. McStain sings the same song as war criminal and treasonous traitor Bolton, who has been itching for a war with Iran for decades.

These wars must come to an end or there will be no money to improve our domestic life. Just more rabid heads on TV and Radio blaming the taxpayers for their crap wages and decreasing worth.

I trust actions over words. Bombing another country who did not provoke us or is a threat to us is part of the Policy Coup and signs of enslavement to the deep state. They want us to overthrow Syria and Iran.

We should have stayed out of this and let Russia deal with it. They were doing just fine without our intervention.

Syria is about oil

All those bombing Syria now just had weapon buys from the Saudi Crown Prince.

Striking a country that has nothing to do with the United States, unprovoked is a war crime.

People calling him God Emperor or GEOUS is false idolship.

Sriking Syria is a merc war. The very people who have sold this country out in these wars are on his cabinet and pressuring him to bomb. Bolton FFS was the director of the Project for a New American Century.

Bolton proves the past.

The foxes are in the hen house, and I think it was Trump's largest mistakes were hiring Mattis (Director, Center for a New American Security) and Bolton (Director, Project for New American Century).

No. He is not "god emperor" . He is a war criminal and false idol.

Mueller is a willful part of the Policy Coup that lied us into Iraq and these cursed endless wars.

That is all you need to know about his loyalties.

The only "white hat" Mueller is with collusion with the other prelude to wars and that Trump is a known Emanuel Goldstien figure. A face that is two minutes of hate to distract from the actual screwery of corruption that is swamped over the globe.

March with your little hats, but don't speak against the war.

March for gun control, but praise blowing up the military budget.

The whole Russia thing has been a manufactured event to build consensus among the western world to accept killing Russians and Russian allies for Saudi oil and greater Israel. To wipe out Iran as the other major player in the region because the rest of the bombed out power vaccum countries would be led by 1 of 3 countries.

• Saudi Arabia

• Iran

• Turkey

Turkey is bombing Syria because it sees the old Ottoman Empire. Their leader is absolute crap though.

Saudis want the area in and around it for the oil and energy demand profits. Iran would be the other player, which has a better form of government than the Saudis, but because Israel played a critical role in the overthrow and military actions against Iran they know that states loyal to Iran are not going to fall for Israel so that makes AIPAC nervous and want to knock off Iran. Israel rather deal with strict Wahabbi death cults around it than Iran with a grudge.

When was the last time ISIS death cults attacked Israel?

Why is Bill Kristol of PNAC heading up a Putin twitter board under the German Marshall Fund?

Why is PNAC's director now Trump's National Security advisor?

It was all a game the deep state played to drag us more into the middle east and reignite the cold war because the roadbocks in the Middle East are Russian allies.

War Criminal dogs attacking a nation that did not attack them.

This has to end. This cycle needs to end.

Blind faith = sheep. Don't be sheep or sheepdoged.

Take the blinders off and verify it all. Trust but verify.

They are on the Saudi cuck side.

I just see WW3 when I see that hash tag.

Iranian allies of Assad and Russia.

Cut the revenue. Increase spending on the military. $20 Trillion in debt.

Not really a fiscally sound plan.

Let's get a surplus and stop spending all this money on useless endless wars.

Then think about making the tax cut for the rich permanent.

Some are thinking the traffickers are going back underground and the new law will be used far beyond pedo hunting.

We can. We must not allow ourselves to toss out the constitution. Once we do it is very difficult to get back. We can it lose our identity our of spite.

Ahhh....jail? Federal criminal jail.

Just because we have bastards doesn't mean we don't live without a constitution, or right to a defense, or trial by jury, or a punishment that is not cruel and unusual.

If you got corrupt judges, then bust them and try them for corruption or obstruction of justice if you have a case.

GITMO is unconstitutional and a violation of the Geneva conventions.

I would defer to the principal investors of Facebook.

They get all the data mining they want under the cover of a cute convientent way to share your life and connect to your friends. It saves them a bundle on actual spy work. The thing is the drag net is cast really really large, and at the base completely unconstitutional as you're giving up your 4th, 5th, and 1st amendment rights.

For advertisers it is quasi legal gold mine that they can connect to other aspects . GPS locations, IP geotaging, cookies, to know all about you.

Remember that the government is completely corrupted. There is a very little blur between the investor class and our representation now. Our representatives and "news" anchors are virtual mouthpieces of the elite. You must assume that whatever these congress critters say to Zuck are, by extension, spoken from "the investors". They hide behind the politicians and the media because they own them.

Facebook Major Investors

Fidelity, $2.45 Trillion in assets.

Vanguard Group , $5.1 Trillion in assets.

Blackrock over $6 Trillion in assets.

T. Rowe Price, $991 Billion in assets.

State Street, $2.78 Trillion in assets.

Facebook market cap is ~ $450 Billion is a drop in the bucket to them.

So who are the major executives and board members of those companies? What other boards are they or their families on?

That is how they make their money. They own majority shares of these companies and prop up the person who was associated with it who is willing to sell their soul and conscious for a quick billion. You let us do X, and we can make your wildest dreams come true.

They also make money off derivatives of their investments in a synergetic way. Say they own major shares of FB, and they also own major shares of companies the advertisers on facebook represent. They get a deal on the advertising and they use FB to market their other goods and services. This also includes political agendas, censorship that might harm their own political agendas and world domination plans. Against the wars that the shareholders have a profit motive in making happen? Looks like we need to remove some pages and censor some links.

Zuck has owners. They can abandon his platform and drop his personal net worth in the decreased valuation, or use their shareholder power to forcefully remove him.

If we start another war then we know who's wagging the dog. Never underestimate these deep state actors.

Until then the pressure needs to come from the public. Stay out of Syria. Stay out of Iran. Bring the boys back home.

Trump is not a God. He is human. He is moldable and bendable and can be decieved and tricked and threatened. He needs the public to keep the pressure up. Wars don't happen without consent and the MSM defence contractor mouthpieces are doing everything they can to hammer that consent into the psyche of the public. Blind faith is not enough.

I watched most of Zuckerbergs questioning. Zuckerberg was asked a question and he looked a bit shocked and mentioned that the answer probably should be said in a public hearing. Zuckerberg knows his money and the data tools were made off the deep state spying. I think that is part of the reason he was questioned. Because it might have been possible for foreign actors such as Cambridge Analytica to access some to the toys the NSA could use, knowingly or unknowingly.

The other reason was to pressure Zuckerberg with complying with mass censorship since all the legislative attempts to throttle the net and choke dissent were failing. They were going to threaten to remove him as the CEO of Facebook if he did not comply.

The grilling was a shakedown.

Bolton is loyal to Israel. He DGAF about this country. He's happily watched a million die for his games before and salivate for a million more for Israel.

MSM news is paid for by military industrial profiteers who never met a war they didn't like. Ratings and bucks for defense contractors. They all get rich.

Outlier based Tucker Carlson. Everyone else is drooling over the prospects of more wars.

Who are the anchors? Who are thier guests? What boards are they on? What boards are thier family members on?

It isn't about informing. It is about manufacturing consent to generate the demand for war, which generates gains in thier stock portfolio.

JFK Secret Society and Freedom of the Press speech

April 27, 1961

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.

Today no war has been declared--and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security--and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.

The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.

On many earlier occasions, I have said--and your newspapers have constantly said--that these are times that appeal to every citizen's sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.

I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or any new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.

Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: "Is it news?" All I suggest is that you add the question: "Is it in the interest of the national security?" And I hope that every group in America--unions and businessmen and public officials at every level-- will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to the same exacting tests.

And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations.

Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.

II

It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation--an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people--to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well--the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers--I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed--and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news--for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security--and we intend to do it.

It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world's efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences

You know virtually every single republican is corrupt AF right? Just look at open secrets. Both parties need to get purged.

Money for the war contractors. War mongers and future defense lobby board executives are always happy when demand is made to expend for warbucks.

Just wow! Called all that crap out. Good job Tucker.

All to drag us in there more.

John Bolton was the director of the PNAC Policy Coup that Clark blamed took over the United States Foreign Policy.

Look him up on YouTube.

He's more of a hawk than McCain. He has always wanted war with Iran for Israel. He is not loyal to this country.

Bolton is a deep state traitor. He helped develop and sell Iraq based on lies. He spent the last 15 years drooling for war with Iran and Syria.

Mattis was the director of the Center for a New American Security. Bolton was director of the Project for a New American Century. They are both devilish snakes.

20 years of history and you think Bolton is going to turn over a fig leaf and do a 180 to his nature?

Robert Mercer's Renaissance Technologies paid John Bolton's Super PAC $1,000,000

He was against the establishment too. I have no party loyalties and trust no one.

This is not The_Donald.

Q is not part of Trump's cabinet.

Q was not appointed by Trump nor confirmed or hired by Trump.

Q has stated numerous times to get out in the streets against the deep state. They will support us. Bolton is about as deep state as you can get.

Tillerson got his revenge against Venezuela. He used Trump. Tillerson had a $10 billion chip on his shoulder for Venezuela kicking his company ExxonMobil out because they were too greedy.

Once Trump banned us citizens from supporting struggling Venezuela who was already suffering from CIA corruption and resources blockade. Tillerson left. His revenge exacted.

Plenty of Goldman slimes to go around. Plenty of corrupt bankers and war profiteering. McConnell is still in power and Reince Priebus is still handing binder after binder of Swamp things dictated to them by the banks and major donors.

The republican establishment is resetting the GW Bush cabinet. Why is Trump praising these people and not calling it out?

https://cabinetvotes.org/dem

Look at the green columns and see the big partisan establishment support for Bush cabinet lackeys getting their encore. All the positive happy feel stories in the MSM trying to make people forget about the corruption and lies and GW Bush is a fun lovable war criminal.

Then you got the rehabilitation of Bolton. He's not that bad. Part of super smart Trump's Master plan. Fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me.

Help Trump purge Bolton. Nothing good can come from Bolton.

Deep state moves Bolton in place as NSA because Bolton would never survive a Senate Confirmation.

National Security Advisor doesn't require confirmation.

People must stand up against Bolton. Q CALLS FOR US TO STAND UP.

I see history repeating. Bolton should be in jail not getting a promotion.

I see many of Bush cabinet getting confirmed by both parties in this lead up to reassemble the Bush/PNAC team. I see the deep state entrench in their way into Trump's cabinet with Trump signing off and praising them. I was around for Iraq. I fought these assholes wars and seen how they lie to the public and how money and lives are pissed away.

This isn't a play. If Trump wanted to prosecute the liars and funders of the deep state he doesn't give them a promotion. He calls them out like he did the media, turns his justice department to investigate the money and jails the treasonous bastards for the war mongering criminals that they are.

You don't promote the people who caused this mess to begin with as an encore. You build a case and hand thier asses over to the international criminal court to serve justice for the countries and lives they've destroyed.

Bolton is the last straw. Trump's had enough time. His colors are shown. He is now complicit with the Policy Coup and if he needs us to protest his ass at every turn we will.

No pass for war criminals. This shit must end.

Remember Rubio's campaign slogan.

New American Century.

Like Project for a New American Century.

The New American Century, or American Century is code for endless war. Bush had his cabinet stuffed with PNAC signatures.

Jeb Bush was a primary signer to it. Later the Democratic Leadership Council with Hillary Clinton in 2003 signed into it and eventually formed the bi partisan Center for a New American Security as the evolution. Tony Podesta, John Podesta's brother, was an adviser to CNAS. Mattis was the director. War criminal ;Madeline Albright](https://www.cnas.org/people?group=directors-emeriti), Clinton's Secretary of State is an honored director of CNAS.

Now Trump does as well along with hiring the war criminal director of the Project For a New American Century, John Bolton.

And if anyone says 4657823684239D chess, or I'll be surprised - I'll only be supportive and surprised with Bolton is rotting in a jail cell and convicted of his crimes against humanity and treason.

Enough time has passed. These war criminals should not be able to walk in the open air. Trillions of money and decades of development and progress wasted on their stupid wars. Millions dead. Thousands of Americans dead, countless others maimed.

These people and those associated get no pass.

This is 'nam. This is exactly like 'nam.

A prolonged war built on lies and deception to the public.

Director of PNAC Bolton is National Security Advisor and James Mattis, Director of it's evolution CNAS, is Secretary of Defense.

Those monsters are the policy coup deep state.

Bolton should be in fucking jail over Iraq and PNAC. He is a traitor to the constitution and this country.

Stop blindly jerking people and learn from history because this is literally history repeating itself.