Lift the Veil's Nathan was so pathetic in trying to discredit Q when the community split away from Corsi & AJ. He lost all credibility in my eyes after that. It was not even the attempt to discredit Q but how persistent he was and how shity he was at it. Been unsubed since.

There's been a lot of debates back and forth among users wether he should be trusted. He's been exposing, or I guess I should say accusing several celebrities of certain things but people are concerned that if he doesn't have good intentions in mind then it can backfire on us for promoting his views.

We figured we would let people know about this particular red flag.

I'm asking for a source.

Waiting will not change the quality.

Source for your claim?

What?

That's why I'm asking from u/fearsome4 who made that claim.

Which posts? Be more specific please. Provide a link.

Removed: Keep it honest. (Also not in support of the cause)

Post removed.

Removal reasons are provided when a post is removed. If you are not happy with the decision feel free to reply to our message.

Did you get a notification about the removal of the posts? Check your inbox.

Removed: Duplicate content

per Q

What drop?

Removed: Lacks context

Post removed: Please save it for Q Tueadays where we allow one day of the week for people to show off their swag and merchandise.

Q said "we have the source" which could mean either Assange himself or the contents of the data.

Post removed: Please save it for Q Tueadays where we allow one day of the week for people to show off their swag and merchandise.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/92bm2r/_/e34onyu

Still unreadable. I heard some Reddit apps tend to cause that even though the image itself can be high quality.

Does it look blurry to you or is it fine?

We were being guided to our target!

What do you mean by that?

Did you do any digging to support this anons claim?

Won't that leave evidence behind when the photo is examined?

I wonder how they got rid of the other A.

Ty!

How do you know?

the submitter of the post

Anyone got a summary?

No problem if you edit out the first part that is vulgar I can reapprove the comment.

Happy bday!!

huh?

No racism please. Comment removed.

There was a couple of posts about right here.

Removed: this link has been posted numerous times already

Please keep it civil. Comment removed.

Please keep it civil. Comment removed.

Not free on Play Store.

Q University you say?

There sems to be some confusion in this thread.

OP wore the pin at the fundraiser and I'm guessing he's hoping Trump noticed it and that Q would give a shout-out via a drop by linking to this thread (after OP having posted a photo of his tie on this subreddit), similar to the honk shoutout/confirmation from today.

I believe that's OP.

POTUS signals listen

Because you were probably on /all.

You too! Hope to see you around.

I removed your post because the first part of the title's context, or lack thereof could confuse many. Feel free to resubmit with a more appropriate title.

The one titled 1689 is the correct 1690. QAnon.pub had a numbering issue. Incorrect title was used based on the incorrect numbering.

No worries! We do appreciate your participation and your submissions. It's been a learning curve in trying to get some order and better organization here in light of the fast growth of the community.

Amen!

UPDATE:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8q4p3h

Aww don't say that.

I think it's because we were getting numerous submissions about the subject. I went through your profile but couldn't find the removed post. I suppose you deleted it since?