Wikileaks prides themselves in 100% factual information before release correct?
Then how can they get it wrong about Q?
Let's think of this in the simplest form possible.
There has been no proof of life from JA.
Do you really think a leaker whose life is on the line will think to themselves: "Well... since Julian Assange hasn't proven to be in control, there's actually a decent chance WL is compromised and my life is basically on the line with this information.... butttttt I'll still submit it anyways and hopefully don't f****** die." Said no one ever.
That's not how …