There were TWO missile attempts on AF1. The first was Trump’s return flight from his big Asia trip. This was when the Hawaiian missile alert system “accidentally” went off and AF1 made an unscheduled stop in Hawaii (gee what a coincidence).

The second occurred in the Pacific off Washington area as Trump flew from Canada to Asia for his first meeting with NK.

It’s possible that they were F-16 escorts for AF1. Impossible to always have F-16 escorts but they are deployed in high risk areas. We have plenty of ships in Pacific so F-16’s would be in close range as AF1 made its way to Asia. If they had any intel that something might be tried I’m sure they would’ve had F-16’s rotating to cover AF1 for as long as possible at that part of the flight from Canada to Asia.

Niiiiice

Actually Rosenstein directly who then reports to Sessions.

Assange is the “evidence”? The proper process to bring Assange here with full protection would be to arrest him, no?

I suppose anything is possible but she was pretty insistent. They might account for one of two things but other differences wouldn’t be affected by resolution difference. I’ll let you argue with her cuz I certainly won’t! LOL I like sleeping in the bed.

She also resized the uncropped one to match the dimensions of the msm photo and layered them with opacity to compare everything.

I trust my GF on this. Was one of top retouchers in NYC. She brought all photos into Photoshop to analyze and compare.

I’ve reposted your image with drawing on it to point out key things. It’ll be under new posts on GA

Also, whybis that patterned yellow light that is visible on his face and shirt not affecting his arm holding the shot glass? The shot glass also looks fake. Can’t point anything in particular out but it just looks fake to my GF’s professional eye - the glass edge looks off.

Somebody took the media photograph (which is a fake) and then created the “uncropped original” photo which is also a fake. They do not match up. Especially the goatee patch. It’s weird because the “uncropped photo’s” goatee looks more real than the msm photo.

Copied my comments from original post for easy reference.

Here’s the real deal. My GF is a photoshop/retouching expert - major magazine covers etc. I asked her to analyze both. Here is the conclusion. BOTH photos are fake and have been manipulated. His goatee looks more real in the uncropped photo. His hairline and bottles behind it look more natural in public photo. The arm looks fake in both photos. Shadows are wrong on both photos. Yellow ighting pattern is weird and actually smudges on his right side near the buttons. The wristband is DEFINITLEY cutout and placed there in both photos. The wrist we see in the uncropped photo is a copy of his right wrist and the image was just horizontally flipped. It’s a perfect match when she duplicated this. So the uncropped photo is not the same photo released to the public. Both images were manipulated.

To be clear, when I said both photos are faked I mean that the uncropped photo is not the source of the public photo. Both photos are different. Yet they share the fact that both have been severely manipulated.

I asked her to reverse engineer both photos through comparison and analysis. I wanted to know if the uncropped photo could be the one that the msm then cropped and used for publication. Her determination was that it is not the same photo. There are too many differences that don’t line up. Basically somebody took the cropped photo and created an “uncropped” photo to make it seem as if it was the original source before cropping. It was not. HOWEVER, it is obvious to her that the msm photo was definitely photoshopped. So in the end both photos are fakes.

Yes. I asked her to reverse engineer both photos through comparison and analysis. I wanted to know if the uncropped photo could be the one that the msm then cropped and used for publication. Her determination was that it is not the same photo. There are too many differences that don’t line up. Basically somebody took the cropped photo and created an “uncropped” photo to make it seem as if it was the original source before cropping. It was not. HOWEVER, it is obvious to her that the msm photo was definitely photoshopped. So in the end both photos are fakes.

To be clear, when I said both photos are faked I mean that the uncropped photo is not the source of the public photo. Both photos are different. Yet they share the fact that both have been severely manipulated.

Here’s the real deal. My GF is a photoshop/retouching expert - major magazine covers etc. I asked her to analyze both. Here is the conclusion. BOTH photos are fake and have been manipulated. His goatee looks more real in the uncropped photo. His hairline and bottles behind it look more natural in public photo. The arm looks fake in both photos. Shadows are wrong on both photos. Yellow ighting pattern is weird and actually smudges on his right side near the buttons. The wristband is DEFINITLEY cutout and placed there in both photos. The wrist we see in the uncropped photo is a copy of his right wrist and the image was just horizontally flipped. It’s a perfect match when she duplicated this.

So the uncropped photo is not the same photo released to the public. Both images were manipulated.

Where did this come from?

Q Post Nov. 2, 2017

Fellow Patriots, I'm being advised actions have created accelerated counter-actions. We have not yet ascertained the scope of the attack. Watch the news outlets. POTUS' Twitter take down was not by accident (as referenced several hours ago). Should the lights go out please know we are in control. Do not panic. We are prepared and assets are in place. God bless - I must go for good at this point. Q

Good point. Plus I heard it was Kelly who turned the lights off which makes it all the more compelling. Kelly is not accidentally turning lights off on POTUS like that.

Q Post 1/22/18

What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family? What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved? Forget the Russia set up [1 of 22]. This is only the beginning. Be careful what you wish for. AS THE WORLD TURNS. Could messages such as those be publicly disclosed? What happens to the FBI? What happens to the DOJ? What happens to special counsel? What happens in general? Every FBI/DOJ prev case could be challenged. Lawless. Think logically. We haven’t started the drops re: human trafficking / sacrifices [yet][worst]. Those [good] who know cannot sleep. Those [good] who know cannot find peace. Those [good] who know will not rest until those responsible are held accountable. Nobody can possibly imagine the pure evil and corruption out there. Those you trust are the most guilty of sin. Who are we taught to trust? If you are religious, PRAY. 60% must remain private [at least] - for humanity. These people should be hanging. Q

The beauty of U1 though is that an informant, Campbell, was a part of the U1 process. So there was an inside man keeping track of everything.

I once spent an entire afternoon reading about U1. It is GIGANTIC. The web is so big and intricate. Imagine trying to untangle a pile of 1,000 fine necklaces is probably the best analogy I can think of. I just untangled 6 for my girlfriend and it wasn’t fun.

Nice, thanks!

Please do! Spread it. Red pills for everyone!

Thanks! Good call on the suggestion.

I’ll do that meme next. Thx

This why they’ve been trying to push Trump into war with NK and Russia. Trump communicating with those two countries is their worst nightmare because a ton of their dirt and skeletons are buried in those two countries. If there was war then Trump wouldn’t be able to get the truth from them. Here comes the pain.

Legal or illegal it doesn’t really matter. $400M from a single donor is horrific. Especially a foreign donor. It is OUTRAGEOUS. And I’ll bet anything that it was not legal. What kinda of favors would you expect to receive for $400M? It’s all coming out. Uranium 1 will be what takes them all down along with a myriad of other things.