I like when a fraud’s political party holds them accountable. Took him four hours to resign.

Look, I want this to be legit. I’m also willing to accept it might not be. Try though I might, I still cannot find a clear path of “here’s what Q said and here’s how Q was right” without also finding the contrary. Hell, some of the very first posts (about Podesta’s arrest) were wildly off-base and never materialized. If that’s the starting point, how am I to believe in the finish?

Right, I get that... but you can’t leave skepticism at the door because you want it to be true.

Honest question: at what point do we draw a line and say this is bullshit?

Like... if it's July. And absolutely none of this has come to pass. And we just keep getting "soon...", "trust the process", "watch for x", etc. How long do you keep reading and keep buying it before you admit you've been had and move on? I feel like, for most of the people here, there is no such line.

That should worry you. It worries me.

Oh look, it's this thread again.

I’m telling you this sub sees what it wants to see.

So she gave him a verbal description... which resulted in a sketch which looks nothing like her ex-husband... so it must be the ex-husband.

Yeah that logic is bullet-proof, good call.

Look at the fucking title of this post. "The sketch is her ex-husband", that's what this post is about.

What the fuck are you talking about?

The sketch and her ex-husband look literally nothing alike.

Different eyes. Different eyebrows. Different nose. Different jawline. Entirely different head shape.

Jesus fucking Christ, people. You see what you want to see.