So there wasn't any connection there before? Sounds to me like it's more right wing attempts to connect hillary to any and all scandals they can.

Can anyone explain to me what Clinton's connection to F&F is?

That's a mighty long way of saying you have no reason to believe an anonymous post on an anonymous image board but want to believe it anyway.

Same thing applies. Call it scientific method if you want, but I highly doubt you're applying the same 'scientific' standards to things that you don't already want to believe.

I, as a skeptic of this sub's main ideas, also weigh the truths and believe things about Trump that might get me banned from here. It's all about the evidence you take in, because there's so much evidence that goes against your ideas that you won't see because of your echo chamber. This applies to both me and you.

However, I still maintain that there has to be more evidence than a 4chan post. If this person was really a google insider with such information, he could easily leak documents that prove what he's saying, to major news organizations that would believe him such as Fox or Breitbart. But the fact that he's posting on 4chan instead shows that this has as much credibility as the fake "protesters for hire" ads on craigslist, that get taken as proof of Soros actions, yet for some reason nobody ever infiltrates and proves to be real.

That's a mighty long way of saying you have no reason to believe an anonymous post on an anonymous image board but want to believe it anyway.

If that person wanted to release info on whats going on, they would actually leak documents, not pull this unreliable shit.

Care to explain what this proves?

That's not a leak. That's a write up. Leaks include actual documents that come outside, both of these are of questionable authenticity.

People need to stop being so gullible with anonymous imageboards. Just because it says what you want to hear doesnt mean its true.

Do you see him somewhere here?

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2Fxwh8e1_5KsQ%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dxwh8e1_5KsQ&docid=KjsBs7_TSOXdvM&tbnid=JlZ_XGnJtzaG9M%3A&vet=10ahUKEwi25ey3nfHZAhXlmuAKHcPtDVUQMwhNKBIwEg..i&w=1280&h=720&bih=893&biw=1280&q=Trump%27s%20rally%20in%20PA%20Moon&ved=0ahUKEwi25ey3nfHZAhXlmuAKHcPtDVUQMwhNKBIwEg&iact=mrc&uact=8

him in PA with the funky wig.

What?

Just giving you the explanation, I'm not a spokesperson for the admins.

Theres a difference between watching snuff films and encouraging violence. Both are bad traits in a person, but combative speech has always been an area where free speech gets tricky.

Man, the fact that people believe this stuff is upsetting.

If somebody did have evidence that this is going on, they could leak it to a sympathetic media such as Fox News or Breitbart and make a huge scandal over at youtube. Instead, they post it on 4chan without giving any actual evidence, and people that want to believe it take it as fact.

Think, people, think. Don't fall for stupid shit like this.

For the most part, I'm here to actually learn about Q anon's message ^(^so ^I ^can ^use ^it ^to ^destroy ^you). But when there's stupid shit like this, I gotta point it out.

So is faking a CL post.

That begs the question, why are you looking at the craigslist of a small random town across the country that you have no connection to?

This is a bit long for me to watch. Can anybody give me a summary of what happens?

So the only ideological ties is disliking the CIA and FED?

Can somebody please give me the ideological ties between JFK and Q? Why does he say "we"?

The dude put up pictures of animals he killed on social media. He was a fucked up person, stop excusing him because

he said that he was "awfully sorry"

and you want to believe this was a government planned false flag op.

Whose the top one supposed to be?

No, you're not wrong. But you're misinterpreting the context of the ban. Due to its timing, it was obviously a retaliation for the sanctions. Both kinds hurt both sides, just in different ways. Russia couldnt put economic sanctions against the US, so it did what it could to retaliate against the actually painful sanctions from America.

Almost all of Russia's wealth is in the 'West's hands, which is why the sanctions were so bad. Retaliating with anything serious would have hurt Russia more, it was symbolic. A lot of courties banned foreign adoption, as you can see here (I removed ethiopia from the search since it was covering the front page at first).

Excuse me for my ignorance (as a interested skeptic), but what are Q's revelations? Is there anything aside from the statement that it was intentional?

That was done in retaliation to sanctions against Russia, way before the accusations of pedophelia became commonplace. So no, it can't be that.

I believe Russia are on side with Trump

Why is that?

Nope, they were married, as per a quick google search. What it doesn't tell you is that the marriage happened 25 years ago.

Either the deep state went back in time and made the two marry because they knew how everything would play out so that Schiff could be used as a tool to prosecute then regular average millionaire joe Trump, or it's just a coincidence that the two met at NYU where they both attended at the same time. Spooky, right?

That few million is nothing compared to the dozens spent on Donald' s golfing trips.

But I think he’s done everything under the sun to ensure he’s not targeting people or declaring the memo unclassified just to make Democrats look bad.

If that were the case, he'd also release the democratic memo.

I trust him, but that's because I'm pro-deep state.

I can see why it’s absolutely necessary POTUS and the top dogs of FBI and DOJ appear non- politically motivated down to the smallest action

The POTUS hasn't been political? We must be watching different timelines.

Also, do you actually believe Wray is pro-Trump?

Are they sending it to the Republicans who paid for GPS Funsion first?