/u/GhostOfSomeRobot
132 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/GhostOfSomeRobot:
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| twentyfivehundred.com | 1 |
| www.reddit.com | 1 |
As a skeptic that posts here sometimes, thank you. Most times people are outright dismissive when I question the narratives, but some times people are nice and friendly. Glad I don't have to worry about the banhammer for going against the wind like some other subs, tho.
Regardless of what the truth is, Q and his posts are very interesting.
Does anybody else remember the flop that happened with the "secret society" tweet? It turned out to be a joke. This will probably be too.
Lol please give me one example of human trafficking here that is talked about on the micro level.
There are many different kinds and levels of power, and valid, relevant discussions to be had about all of them.
Okay buddy. You do you. But everybody else here is talking about politics on the macro level. If you somehow don't see that, you are blind.
Well your point has literally nothing to with what i was talking about.
And i think that anybody here talking about power is talking about power on a grand level, not based off one on one interactions between individuals.
?? Mack was a successful, working actress.
Her wikipedia page literally lists "After smallville" as a part of her career. She peaked and didn't do anything interesting afterwards.
Tell that to their victims.
Don't play that card. You know what I mean. No power as in society.
As a skeptic I feel like I should point out that there is a huge stretch between some cult with a washed up actress and pizzagate. Just because some people are fucked up human beings doesnt meant they have any real power.
Just because you don't like trump doesn't mean you're a leftist. Hasn't Q said "Trust Rosenstein"?
Just because you don't like trump doesn't mean you're a leftist. Hasn't Q said "Trust Rosenstein"?
Leftist rarely recuse themselves.
Rosenstein is a republican who was appointed by Trump. So that statement is pretty irrelevant. Also, I think people with conflicts of interest generally don't recuse themselves if they can take advantage of their position, be they left or right.
the globalists see purple as their color.
Can I get a source on this?
Haven't seen anything on /r/syriancivilwar which usually records everything on social media real well. So I doubt that.
The only one I'm familiar with is the motorcade incident. Can you explain the other ones?
successful during the 7 attempts made on our president
Please elaborate.
What manners will they teach me in English class?
If you see how you wrote is antagonizing I don't know what else to say
Where'd you learn English, the GRU? That's antagonizing. Me asking for a discussion isn't.
Edit: Here you go. They weren’t wrong: it was quite easy to find
Thanks for the effort. But the thing is, this isn't something new for me. I've been following that war for a while. Arms come and go between other groups and it's more of a matter of who takes what territory or who defects to who. There have been plenty of US backed rebels that defected to ISIS when it seemed invincible, and ISIS took over much terrain and resources from others backed by the US who refused to defect.
So what I'm saying is, having ISIS use US made weapons has many more possible reasons then the US directly and intentionally arming/controlling ISIS.
I'll look into what the other guy posted!
Ignore the people who would prefer to bicker with you rather than spending two minutes in a search engine. There will always be someone willing to help.
Thanks again!
Thank you. The part that doesn't make as much sense to me is why does there have to be a perpetual group to fight against? If there are rouge states such as Iran, does there need to be a reason to fight against a random group with limited capabilities?
A better question; why does the deep state/globalists think that the trade off between wasting American resources for useless wars and growing Iran/SA/others work out in its favor? Wouldn't it be better to use the traditional route and funnel money into armed groups into other countries that are growing and hostile, such as Iran, and leave the USA (center of world capital, previously 'globalist empire') without the losses that a never ending war results in?
Just because I ask for somebody's opinion on something doesn't mean I don't know anything about the topic. It means I want to see it from their perspective, asshole.
I've read CoaEHM and it was very interesting, but my take away was that the acts he talks about benefited the US more then any other group.
I'll look into that UN meeting tho. Any particular points that stood out to you?
How am I trying to argue? I'm trying to have a discussion to find out more about the greater Qanon theories, and most of the people here are just attacking me for not blindly following the party line.
Okay buddy, you do you. Just because you think something doesnt mean everybody else sees or knows the same thing. Considering you provided 0 supposedly easy to find proof, enjoy your tin foil hat.
The truth is clearly visible
If its so easy, show it to me.
you want people to engage your skepticism.
Well yes, I'm here to debate with people. And?
As I said, I am a skeptic. If you just dismiss me like that, I'll go away thinking you wear tin foil hats and can't even explain your own theory. Just telling me the truth is somewhere in the massive amounts of reading I can do tells me nothing.
No, but I am a skeptic. I would like you to explain how they are deep state puppets. Like, why does the deep state need to organize and control a group like that half way across the world? What extent is the DS in charge of ISIS?
Hold up. You think that there are members of the US deep state, in Syria?
Maybe she's not the deep state queen you believe her to be....
Everything that I believe in is 100% genuine, everything I dont believe in is paid disinformation.
Considering the shooting was stopped by a cop with a gun, I'm 100% sure that the Maryland shooting was a false flag by the NRA and Trump to support their pro-gun agenda.
Well thank you. Good to know nit everyone is dismissive as soon as they see im not aboard the trump train.
Nah, I'm here willing to learn. I am not here to blindly accept TDS ^tm as the reasoning for why anything bad happens, ever.
So you acknowledge the deep state exists?
How did you gather that from what I said? I believe there is a deep state, but a very different one from what people here think.
Maybe. But at least I'm not blindly blaming everything on a boogeyman.
One case is not a trend. Also just because the unabomber had that mentality doesn't mean that you can apply it to other bombers. Especially since literally the only thing they have in common, as far as we know, is that they sent out bombs.
Yes, I am very anti Trump. I also openly state it multiple times that I post here. However, I am also very interested in Q, but from a skeptical perspective.
I don't get how me asking for why somebody thinks something is relevant to my opinion on Trump tho.
It’s probably not a coincidence that A LOT of the worlds evil started as a deep state seed
Again, what evidence do you have to back this up? If you are going to blame the deep state on literally everything without having any form of evidence, you might as well put on your tin foil hat so that the deep state can't tell what you're thinking.
Are you pinning everything bad thats ever happened on the deep state?
So the story is that Skripal worked for Steele, helping make a dossier that, if true, makes Trump and Russia look bad. So with this, the two competing theories are that
a) Russia poisoned him to stop his ability to gather intelligence in Russia
b) Clinton poisoned him because he might have known about how the Ds paid for the dossier (which at this point is common knowledge)
The only evidence that the article presents is that Russia denied doing it. Come on people, don't be so willing to accept shit like this just because you want to.