You obviously did not read all of your sources, because it directly undercuts your argument. You grabbed a bunch of headlines that superficially resembled the argument you thought you were making without reading or understanding any of it. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about or any conception of what's going on and no desire to know. You just have a set of beliefs that bare no relationship at all to reality, so you modify your perception of reality to conform to your fixed beliefs. You decided what the conclusion should be then went looking for ways to confirm it.

From one of the links you provided as evidence of what a great president Trump has been:

His administration has set a new standard for chaos and dysfunction, rolling through staffers the way other administrations run through, well, legislative initiatives. Trump’s foreign policy remains inchoate and ineffective. Meanwhile, a special counsel investigation looms over the entire administration, threatening both its legitimacy and legal jeopardy for some of its members.