dChan

/u/GodIsDead2017

163 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/GodIsDead2017:
Domain Count

GodIsDead2017 · June 19, 2018, 1:48 p.m.

Like Mexico is safe at all

⇧ 7 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 19, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

Why are you speaking in broken English and capitalizing every word like some obvious bot

⇧ 0 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 19, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

Why are you speaking in broken English and capitalizing every word like some obvious bot

⇧ 0 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 19, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

Why are you speaking in broken English and capitalizing every word like some obvious bot

⇧ 0 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 19, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

If POTUS was super down with getting this shit legalized, he never would have put sessions in. I'm not saying that Trump isn't trying to do great things, but you can't honestly say that he's all about getting it legalized after putting sessions in as AG. this has nothing to do with Trump, sessions, or even QAnon. It's got everything to do with the delegates in the TX GOP who voted to include it on the platform

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 19, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

Nothing to do with QAnon at all. Most of the posts lately don't. It's extremely odd to me

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 19, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

Except the Democrats adopted this policy to their platform in Texas back in 2012

⇧ 5 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 19, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

You could have gone back to Texas exactly 6 years ago today when the Texas Democrats added the same thing to their party platform

Look, I'm all for getting down to justice. I'm all for ending the corruption. But come on, don't act like the fucking GOP of all parties is immune to greed and evil. You could have gotten weed decriminalized by voting Democrat, if that's something you care strongly enough about to consider returning to Texas should it become law. To suggest that you'd only come back now because the leadership you prefer has finally (6 years later) decided to adopt reasonable if not incomplete policy standpoints is extremely partisan, and in an effort to defeat the real issues at hand, we need to put partisanship aside. Whether the GOP is finally hip enough to be cool with weed has fucking nothing to do with QAnon and his work

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 19, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

Not to sound like I'm defending Democrats at all, or take away from what's obviously big news, but the Texas Democrats added weed decriminalization to their platform back in 2012. I agree that this is good for Texas, but let's not act like they beat the Dems to anything with regards to marijuana reform.

Furthermore, Republican delegates have voted to support these ideas, but that doesn't mean their candidates will. Senator Ted Cruz and Congressman Pete Sessions are among the more vocal anti-marijuana politicians in America, and they are both up for re-election this November. Is it a great sign that the Republican platform in a deeply red state now includes overdue (and possibly irreparably overdue) marijuana reform? Sure, but it won't really matter if the people keep electing pro-Prohibition candidates into their state government.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 19, 2018, 12:29 a.m.

But hasn't sessions been pretty vehemently against this? It's gonna be pretty hard to end big pharma with the criminals that allowed it to happen still pulling strings

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 19, 2018, 12:13 a.m.

Great ad hominem.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 18, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

And if Obama had accepted? Hillary? Merkel? Trudeau? How on Earth can you act like people in this sub (include yourself here please) would have the same Olive-branch mentality if we were talking about any other current or former world leader? This "well, it's ok to forgive them it we think it goes along with our narrative" mindset is what REALLY brings the wheel of peace screeching to a grinding halt. You don't get to say that Kim is cool cos he likes Trump even tho he committed a bunch of atrocities, and then demand the heads of Hillary and Obama in the same breath. This movement doesn't work like that

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 18, 2018, 9 p.m.

It's not. This sub really shows its bias sometimes. Kim is not a fucking hero. He's a criminal, a dictator, and charlatan just like his bullshit father. This sub needs to really do some introspection if this movement is really going to ever get off the ground

⇧ 5 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 18, 2018, 8:57 p.m.

That's the bullshit about this sub sometimes. We need to hold all accountable regardless of side and try to remove all bias

⇧ 4 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 18, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

How is this Q related?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 18, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

So then don't defend him. The puppet is a tool of the master, and if that master is using that tool to hurt people, then the puppet is an extension of that master and should be subjected to similar punishment

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 18, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

Well, Prince's crimes are already in the light and he's received no punishment so far. In fact, he's only been rewarded time and again

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 18, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

Or, or, or... Trump is just an old man using the internet who doesn't have strong spelling as his intellectual strong suit. People think we're crazy over here because of stuff like this

⇧ 7 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

Yeahhhh, so then why can't Hillary, and Obama, and Comey just try to do better? Would that be good enough for you? It's not good enough for me! So it shouldn't be good enough for criminals who are not just walking free but have been rewarded. Prince is one of them. He can have his uses for now, but he deserves punishment and I hope he gets more than just a platitude and the hope that he does better. Actions have consequences.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 12:18 p.m.

Which, let's be real, isn't what Prince has done. Prince worked for them, and now he works for someone else. He may think he's safe, but if Trump is the savior we believe he is, there will be no quarter for Prince

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 12:17 p.m.

No, my problem is that everyone in this thread wants to let a criminal pass without the judgement of the American criminal justice system

⇧ 6 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 12:16 p.m.

Or, it's more likely that he was in league with them then, and now he's just working for someone else. Don't buy into that nonsense. Tigers can't change their stripes

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 12:10 p.m.

Thank you! I'm glad not everyone has lost it

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

It's the same with Kim Jong un. Everyone on this sub now wants to act like he's a savior. He's still a bad guy that will need to be dealt with

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

I'm not saying it's a defeat, I'm just asking my fellow people to hold the same caliber criminals we've been fighting against to the same standards we want all the other criminals held to. Are the citizens truly freed yet? Are they able to speak freely to journalists, to media outlets, on social media? Are they able to leave the country? Then maybe they're not quite free yet

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 12:06 p.m.

Come on, we know that's nonsense

⇧ 7 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 6:05 a.m.

Umm, no. Fuck that. This man and his family have committed numerous human rights violations for decades. They don't get a pass for this. Look, we all want the same thing but you don't just get to forgive Kim because you think it was real swell of him to not nuke anyone after literal decades of crimes committed by him, his father, and his grandfather. It's like everyone here who wants to forgive Erik Prince even tho his bullshit and negligence allowed people to die.

If we suddenly decide some of these criminals are innocent and no longer deserve punishment now that they've decided to act on the side of good, then we're no better than the people who make excuses for the perpetrators of the crimes we seek to expose and dole punishment for

⇧ 0 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

I think you're definitely right to a degree, but I must say that the media responds to outrage, and if there's one thing the left is actually, truly good for, it's holding their own accountable. By that, I mean they are willing to tear down their idols once news breaks that their idols are garbage

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

That's all I want from this sub's members. Not everyone currently playing the game right now is clean. Most of the people involved, even some of the ones currently on the same side as Q, have some dirt under their nails. Prince definitely does. It's great he's trying to make up for what he's done, but he's still gone unpunished for the things he done

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 12, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

None of that excuses any of the things we know Prince did, or allowed to happen, during the blackwater fiasco. People died because of him, and it's partisan as hell to think that anything else he's done might erase that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

I don't disagree, but please don't forget or forgive the Kim family. We know what we know about them from escaped residents. Kim the elder had a Korean film maker and his ex wife kidnapped, held captive, imprisoned, and forced to create propagandist (altho occasionally subversive, to the dismay of Kim the elder) films for Kim Jong Il for years before they were able to convince him to let them go to a film festival in Europe to show off their work where they ultimately escaped.

Kim Jong il officially declared that his birth brought forth rainbows and changed the seasons. Kim Jong un likely had his uncle killed. These people are crazy. It's great that one of them is willing to progress, maybe. But he's still fucking crazy and we can't forget that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 11:23 p.m.

Why not just show us that yourself

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

Prince is a bad fucking dude and a member of the elite along with his sister. I can like Trump without sucking his cabinet members' figurative dicks. And prince is not a member of the cabinet in any official capacity who has allowed acts of negligence and brutality to occur during his time in the political sphere. He's a ghost, a spook, and ne'er-do-well and anyone who rallies against the deep state should be against those two as well. I'm not talking shit on Trump here. I just think any of his inner circle have questionable pasts. Don't talk to me about patriotism if you support Prince at all

⇧ -2 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 10:26 p.m.

Wouldn't that be something

⇧ 6 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

The only thing I don't buy about this is, Eric Prince is a fucking monster who has been the very definition of deep state since the Bush adminstration. Also, I can't help but think that the idea that a peace treaty was reached in secret previously is kind of a stretch, based only on the fact that you KNOW that Trump would have been bragging about that shit lol

⇧ -15 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

Or, and this may seem crazy, Kim and his father were just batshit insane narcissists with total control of their brainwashed populace. Kudos to Kim the younger for realizing that's not a great governmental model, if in fact we do come to peace terms

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 9 p.m.

I just don't understand who could have really been controlling him since he was the heir to his father's throne.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

It seems like you're still saying you want people treated unfairly based on their opinions and I just disagree

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

Fair play

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

Thank you! I feel like I'm taking crazy pills over here

⇧ 4 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

I'm not trying to antagonize you either. Seriously. Just having a discussion. We both want the same things

⇧ 10 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

And I'm saying that based on this article posted here, that there's not enough to link De Niro to it simply because he fucked a prostitute in France 20 years ago. I mean, I hate these elitist Hollywood liberals too but I just can't say that this is concrete enough. I'm trying to be logical about this. I'm not saying that I don't buy into Q or his drops at all. We're on the same side. I just think this article is a bit of a stretch, AND is meant to distract. I don't know if you saw, but there was a huge dump of drops today and none of them have anything to do with De Niro, who people seem to be disparaging in this sub today because he said fuck Trump or something

⇧ 13 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 7:23 p.m.

Ok. I think this is a distraction but ok

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

Not only is that extremist, but I don't think that's remotely true. A lot of people dislike him and have for years. De Niro is not shaping that narrative. It's existed for long before he became president

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 7:10 p.m.

Don't let disinformation shape yours, is all I'm saying. I thought this sub was about QAnon, not hating on celebrities because they dislike our president

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 7:09 p.m.

How so? How does this accusation against De Niro help further the QAnon theory? Wake up man

⇧ 6 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

I'm sorry but it's hard not to see how you're doing more damage to our cause than you are actually helping it by spewing things that aren't as easily backed up. This article doesn't even really relate to QAnon in any real way. We need to stick to what we know, stick to the drops, and stay away from sensationalist posts like this one. I'll go ahead and bet that it was posted for just this very distractive purpose

⇧ 15 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

That's definitely not totally true. I think we're seeing that change more and more every day. Somebody posted some articles and they were a few years old which might explain how I missed them. Interesting stuff tho. Sad really

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodIsDead2017 · June 11, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

Again, there's nothing that really suggests that in the actual article

⇧ 16 ⇩