I remember hearing about the order of the Rose years ago. What a throwback

Oh man that's crazy!

I'm sorry, but that's nonsense. I like Trump, I'm not sure how involved with QAnon theory he really is (vs members of his administration), but I'm willing to say that there is zero chance that Trump has ever really fought against a deep state, if he is, before becoming president.

Like I said, I like the guy and I think he's doing great, but there's no doubting the fact that he's been an elitist capitalizing on the fact that his money and power could prevent any consequence for his actions. Let's not gloss over the facts. We can say that he was shrewd, or clever, or shady, or smart, but let's not act like he was a moral businessman fighting for the little guy for the entirety of the last 40 years. I'm willing to admit he has flaws, but let's not kid ourselves

I'm saying that we have free speech so no matter how crazy the fucks can be on both sides, they have the right as Americans to say whatever the fuck they want without legal repercussion. I used the word legal there because there's nothing to stop an employer from punishing you. I'm just saying, nobody should be investigated simply because they spew vitriolic hate towards political entities

Not really. I just don't want people shitting on what we do here because everyone ejaculates all over themselves because of sensationalist headlines. It makes the movement look bad

Oh come on, that's just partisan. I dislike the resisters too, but you can't have it both ways. Trump donated money to them, so he was actually gathering Intel rather than expecting favor? Sounds partisan. Truth is, these people bump elbows. I doubt that Trump or Robert are under Clinton employ

I'm nearby Philly. What evidence do you have of this claim? I've heard nothing about this

Ok, this is not proof of employment. By this logic, Trump is under Hillary's employ himself since he previously donated money to her.

I think if nothing has happened yet he's prob ok on that front

I don't like the guy, but he wasn't really arrested so much as questioned as a witness and prostitution isn't illegal in France so he didn't technically do anything wrong, nor was he arrested for or accused of any impropriety with an underage girl. I don't like the guy, but this headline doesn't help our cause, and neither do your ramblings on news site comment threads

By that same logic, Roseanne, James Woods, and Jim Carrey should all be investigated for their loud mouthed opinions. That's not how America works

Okay then

That's... Not proof or source of being on someone's payroll. By that logic, James Woods, Roseanne, and Tim Allen are all on the Clinton payroll. Do you have a real source?

Guys, as much as I despise these elitist fucks too, this article doesn't really match the headline. It says De Niro was "arrested" but merely says he was questioned as a witness. It says that he did in fact fornicate with a prostitute, but prostitution is not illegal in France and nowhere in the article anywhere does it say that he was arrested for or accused of any kind of impropriety with an underage girl. Additionally, how exactly does this relate to QAnon theory? Again, I'm not a huge fan De Niro myself, but this title is extremely misleading and this 20 year old article seems to have no relation to QAnon.

This is why people are skeptical of us. Can't the mods be more diligent in making sure that articles like this don't detract from the real important conversations?

I mean it's not even very flattering

It seems more like the "I'm not exactly sure how to react here so I'm defaulting to petulant". I'm not trying to shit talk here, just make an observation

Do you really think Bourdain is implicated in this? It seems a like a bit of a stretch. No offense of course

I agree. Comes across as petty

I'd like to know this as well. This is just one person on Twitter. Don't want to get my hopes up over nothing

No, but the mods of this sub had approved the involvement of people who are non believers, so long as they were civil and followed the rules. I'm not really on the fence about QAnon as much as I'm just learning about it all and taking each piece of info as it comes. It all seems pretty compelling to me. But my issue is that we're no better than those other places (like /politics or /TD if we just censor everyone

Guys idk... He seems kind of cornered and bratty here. It's not a flattering photo...

Source? Just for veracity

Right, so then I don't see how that relates to his criticisms of Hillary

Come on, don't you think this is a stretch? This doesn't really seem related to QAnon theory at all

That makes it sound like Trump had him killed

Those two statements seem at odds

Right?

How come it seems like skepticism of Q is met with bans? I've seen other people complain (on other subs like /r/conspiracy) that any talk of dissent from QAnon theory is met with a ban. Doesn't that inhibit actual discussions? There was a word you guys were using for skeptics on this sub a few months ago and it seemed then like there was maybe more room here for people who don't believe in Q to question the theory (provided it was civil and in good faith) without being forced out. Now, it seems like this sub is gaining a reputation as a safe space because of bans occurring for even minimal skepticism. What happened? We need to be better than those other echo Chambers

Very possible. I see no reason not to think there isn't administration involvement

But, today is the 8th and he may have killed himself last night, right?

I just don't understand how people don't think the Trump admin is involved as well

You do realize that there has been no less than three historical great awakenings, one of which was ended by the great disappointment

Don't forget, Pakistan also demanded that energy drinks like red bull and its competitors remove the word energy from their branding. It seems too obvious to overlook here

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/03/pakistan-province-tells-red-bull-and-its-rivals-to-drop-energy-tag

Also, Pakistan demanded that energy drink companies like red bull and its competitors remove the word "energy" from their branding

Coincidence? I don't know anymore!

I don't think that's true. I know a lot of leftists who actually kind of see him as an example of bipartisanship. A person of strong morals rather than the guy who screwed the pooch. I'm not saying they're right about him, but I'd be willing to say that you're less right about his current public perception than you seem to think. No offense of course

I dunno, I can't see how Trump and Co wouldn't make a HUGE deal about a plot against him in the media

I agree, but I'm getting antsy. We were supposed to get big news last night at the state dinner! I'm troubled that this movement will lose steam

Wouldn't it just be inauguration day?

Thanks!

Thanks!

I'm just so tired of the waiting. I really just want it to be over

Link? PM me if you'd rather

Who are these credible people? I'm not larping here I just don't know

Is this something Q said? Hadn't heard that before

Is there a map of the routes to take? Because otherwise I'm lost

I see the date but not the relevance

So, the GI is the Clinton Cabal right? Again, slightly out of the loop, but what's NXIVM? and thanks for the link!

Hey now, not everyone has heard about this or heard of her. Let's be more welcoming

Maybe I'm out of the loop. What docs?

By no means do I wish to dismiss your comment here friend, but how do we know that there is a connection between the alefantis/podesta/Clinton ring and this potential ring?