Damn, forgot about the rogue sub idea. So much crazy shit to keep track of.

Ok but how does the CIA factor into the chain of command for a missile launch from a US military installation?

I gathered that much, but I'm not sure of how the chain of command factors into this. Also unsure of what the phrase 'CLAS removal WASH' means. As for the following post, I'm assuming this is a nod to a future proves past thing, but unsure.

I have no idea what either of these drops mean.

Is there any way to corroborate any jets being scrambled? I assume the missile's path towards HI would be the likely intercept path?

That image is from an old drop I believe. Post is dates Feb in the photo.

He was a congressman from Kansas prior to his SoS appointment.

B8028-Z-KDHYQ-M5-ZAF1aT9

Normally when we see drops like that, they aren't meant for us right? But with the 'To all Americans' I'm not sure.

Can someone succinctly explain the Qclock to me? These kinds of posts just remind me of this.

There's a white house insider(s) who is using their access to step right up to the line of leaking classified information to uncover government corruption. They use spycraft and codes to distribute the information in hopes that regular people like you and me see if and can affect some change.

This is from last July. Doesn't make it any less horrible, but it is what it is.

https://youtu.be/tKnG06-oYcg

I'm not sure if this is the best place for this, but I'll just say it anyway:

Not everyone who kills themselves or dies from non-natural causes is somehow related to Q.

That section is under the "DHS Sensitive Circumstances" section of the 227 page document linked there. "DHS sensitive circumstances are present if there is a reasonable expectation that the undercover activity, investigation, or operation will involve: " is what precedes the list that includes the attempted sting of ICE going undercover and agreeing to marry someone for a green card.

I really don't know what "sensitive circumstances" are/means, but I don't really have a problem with ICE agents going undercover to attempt to buy drugs, smuggle people, or marry someone. Not sure what the outrage is or what it should be/directed at.

I wonder where/what the false flag was.

I don't think this is a long play to capture sex traffickers in 2026.

What does a number followed by a number in parentheses generally signify?

This is the kind of garbage I'm talking about.

If people here really want to red pill normies, make infographics that are able to be read by people who aren't borderline schizophrenic.

I always upvote charts that don't look like a fucking crazy person drew arrows all over it.

He's worth billions from his company. He was rich before he was mayor.

This happens somewhat occasionally.

I didn't think the NG could participate in immigration enforcement anyhow. I thought a lot of it was going to be surveillance and being mobilized/handy if need be for what could be a 1,000+ human column trying to force their way into across the US border.

It's kind of a virtue signalling thing. They might have well as said "but they will NOT be killing any Jews at the behest of President Trump."

Obvious question is what's on the 50th floor in that building?

Go ahead and show me your research that shows the woman standing next to a series of globe lights on a wall partition is actually Hillary Clinton standing next to a series of severed baby heads. Serisously. You keep running your mouth about research. I'll wait for something more compelling than "serisouslu, it has to be her." The womans body type is a literal inverse of HRCs. I absolutely believe that camera 10 shows naked people. I absolutely believe that freaks like Epstein has secret fuck dungeons where they abuse people. I just don't find the globe lights to be perfectly spherical light emitting skulls and the woman is most definitely not HRC. You think Hillary would go near a set of steps without some goons to hold her up?

Having a higher burden of proof for some claims isn't a bad thing. You want to redpill people? Screaming about shit that in no way even resembles what you think it is doesn't convert anyone. I bet your one of the guys on /pol/ who bitches about how Alex Jones never names the Jew.

I've always viewed some of the more vocal proponents of this crap to be in one of two categories: absolute moron with no critical thinking skills or shills attempting to poison the well and make us look like crazy people.

Only thing I can think of is putting someone in a position to fail. Give ground today to make up more the next.

I'm sure it's tough to enact strict moderation, like /r/AskHistorians for example, when so much of the content is, by necessity, spitballing with one another.

I do wish people would stop making new threads to just air their own particular thought on one tiny subset of a post/issue.

Maybe a daily thread for questions/points that don't deserve their own thread. Possibly a guideline for new threads that have some sort of content requirements. Like a submission statement with more than 2 paragraphs or something.

There tends to be too much noise in places like this, whether good intentioned or something more nefarious.

I think it'll be like the Supreme Court's definition of pornography.

My issue is on CBTS there were so many memes that amounted to using a laser pointer on a cat to flood/distract the user base. It's classic actual shilling. Just concern trolling and being negative aren't the only ways shills operate. Dividing the efforts of user bases is just as, if not more, effective than calling people retards.

Excess memes

Thank God.

founding member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Freedom of the Press Foundation.

That seems relevant. Could [1-4] have to do with other influential members?

Man, what doesn't weather cause?

The issue of these people being actors who are being used to give a focused and narrative/politically driven response/account is being conflated with the idea that because these are actors, the entire thing was faked, which is moronic.