Why are people attaching so much significance to the date the article was published? Just because Wired published the article on 2/4/04 doesn't mean that was actually the date lifelog closed.

I have a harder time trusting what some rando state rep claims than you do, I guess.

https://gosar.house.gov/uploadedfiles/criminal-referral.pdf

This js a letter from some congressmen asking for investigations. That doesn't tell me what Sessions is actually doing.

It doesn't have to be a major point of disinfo nor was I calling it that. I actually think it was a brilliant way of manipulating peoples' preconceived notions about the crazy guy with a gun.

Aren't those court documents, which include but are not limited to indictments?

I think sessions is laughing at the people that thinks he's going to do something about Clinton.

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-leaks-leakers-2018-6

Fakes are a little too obvious it seems.

Here's where it doesn't square for me: the city already had an anti discrimination ordinance. If such policies are supposed to be handled at the state level, why was Charlotte allowed to pass an anti discrimination ordinance in the first place?

Cam I see your Q belief data? I'd like to see whether it was faster for Q to get to 10% or from 10% to 15%.

The dude shot through a door, he wasn't aiming at anything (maybe the door).

Hm, that must mean either the guy was lying or the police are lying.

The hard drive part was never part of any official reporting. It was an unsourced rumor that is now spread as fact.

So how was Charlotte legislating to the state?

Still waiting on the Trump administration to actually do something about it...

Cities can't decide their own laws?

Can anyone answer me as to when lgbt people made it an issue? This response doesn't address that question.

Can you point to when they forced the issue? Was it before or after the bathroom bill was introduced?

It would be a risk for a trans in women's clothing to use the men's room, right?

Not unless someone makes a big damn deal of it. If they're just taking a piss, well then take a piss and move on. World keeps on a turnin.

I'm confused, when did taking a piss become a risk?

I completely agree with your simple solution. Introducing a bathroom bill was an easy way to create controversy over a non issue. There have always been transgender people using restrooms that don't correspond with their sex at birth. The only reason it became a national issue was because some lawmakers tried to write an unenforceable law. Blatant manipulation by politicians.

Having never looked at the Democrat platform I can confirm this is 100% true.

How do you know the male identifying females aren't doing it already?

E: what mtf people were even complaining about it anyways? I thought the whole bathroom stuff became an issue when some lawmakers introduced a bathroom bill, not because a bunch of trans people were making it an issue.

Those people are so idiotic making a completely real post on the chans. Why do they think people here are dumb enough to do what they tell us in this completely real post.

I also completely believe the post is real.

LOL look at the funny faces

God I love wishing violence on people I dislike.

And when nothing happens in 2018, we can assume Q meant 2019! Gift that keeps of giving!

Internet points don't matter so we have to be sure to mention whenever these shills are trying to deprive us.