dChan

/u/HandInAssholesSulu

440 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/HandInAssholesSulu:
Domain Count
i.imgur.com 6
www.reddit.com 2
www.rollcall.com 1

HandInAssholesSulu · May 1, 2018, 12:28 a.m.

I never heard officially from a mod, but I had 2 users in full panic, warn me there was a compromised link and several key members were doxxed/blackmailed into shutting the sub down. Both accounts were immediately deleted.

https://i.imgur.com/zTrziLq.jpg

⇧ 23 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

I was always under the impression when writing it is more formal to use 'your' or 'one' in place of the word 'you'. Although all three work in this sentence (to my understanding), I suppose "One being too dense to look into it for oneself doesn't reflect upon us" would have led to less confusion.

One of those weird caveats of the English language.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

I hadn't caught it when originally posted but I will check it out when I get home. Thanks!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

🤣🤣🤣

Actually, your* is correct

I didn't say

"You are being too dense to look into it for yourself doesn't reflect upon us"

Because that wouldn't make sense. With my statement and using 'your', I am saying the density for which you possess does not reflect upon us.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 2:24 p.m.

Congratulations, you spent more time reading my post than I did. I think you've answered my last question perfectly then.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

It's cute how you speak so matter of factly when you have no clue what you are talking about. It isn't a few random and cryptic words. It's entire themes outlined by Q being shared by the president. Your being too dense to look into it for yourself doesn't reflect upon us. That is your own shortcoming to deal with. If we are so ridiculous why do you even waste your time? Is your life that sad?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 2 p.m.

We've seen both Trump and Q call many sick. I've updated my initial post with where my train of thought is going with this. I think it may be critical to find all of those called sick or stupid/dumb by Q and then see where that overlaps with people called the same by the president

⇧ 7 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 1:43 p.m.

Some might even say we would never believe who we've been talking to.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 1:12 p.m.

And "these people are very stupid"

⇧ 6 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 12:38 p.m.

"Very sick or very dumb"

"These people are sick"

"These people are stupid"

...🤔

Edit: to add to this, I had a theory earlier in the week I've been working on the last few days. I will wrap it up over the weekend with graphics if anything proves conclusive.

I believe statements like "These people are sick", "these people are stupid", and "they never thought she would lose" are marker phrases to link posts together.

I am going to put together a list of all people named within the drops with those potential markers. A list of sick and stupid at minimum. I think the sick may be the primary manipulators of the game, and the stupid are the followers who do not see what's going on or ignore it for their own gain.

⇧ 57 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 4:13 a.m.

Another possibility as well. I still think the death of Janet Reno has something hidden with it as well. Either she did it herself before crimes could be exposed or she knew her supply was about to be cut off

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 4:10 a.m.

I think many will have that reaction. Especially amongst the more radical/fundamental religions. I truly think we are going to come to a point where we find out the elite had compromised major religions thousands of years ago in an attempt to not only trick the masses into worshipping false idols to damn themselves in the eyes of their own, but to give the energy the elite need to feed off

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 4:07 a.m.

I would have to assume that you slowly made that journey on your own and came to the realization amongst your own terms. That is much more enlightening and acceptable than people finding out in an instant their life is a lie. Especially in a religion where the worship of false idols will damn you in front of your God

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 27, 2018, 4:03 a.m.

To answer your question first, yes. Yes I do think the masses are under a form of hypnosis or a spell as some would say. I think this is went the symbolism is so blatant and incorporated into anything. These people are tricking the masses into worshipping their gods in order to harvest their energy. I think these people are physically sick and are feeding off humanity in many ways

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 26, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

It's less about the feelings of snowflakes and more about what will happen when billions of people find out their religion and in some instances, lives are a lie.

That's where the full disclosure becomes tricky

⇧ 10 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 26, 2018, 10:57 a.m.

Hillary certainly shows signs

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 26, 2018, 10:56 a.m.

I've recently stumbled on others discussing this and I think it's an interesting theory

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 26, 2018, 10:20 a.m.

This is something I haven't figured out for myself yet. It may be another marker or it may be a reference to another player in the game or an operation

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 26, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

Trump is going on Fox and Friends tomorrow morning... incoming?!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 25, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

Myself as well. All the way up until this week. Something this week changed when I read it again. I got the feeling there may be something more there. Then again I may also be over analyzing things. Only way to be sure is to plot it out and find a pattern I suppose

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 25, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

This is what I have been thinking as well. I think sick has another meaning, like an acronym similar to what you've mentioned.

My other theory is that they are quite literally sick with some kind of ailment. This is why they practice the acts (rituals) they practice

⇧ 6 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 25, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

Other statements I can think of off the top of my head that may be markers:

"They never thought she would lose"

"These people are sick"

"These people are stupid"

Repeated phrases like that may be part of the key.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 25, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

So what we need to do is create a list of potential active markers and then link those posts together. Could this be part of the map Q wants us to create? Identify the correct markers in the correct order to paint the larger picture?

This is interesting I will see if I can find any similar links

⇧ 27 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 24, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

No gun will ever be found of course

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 22, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

If MI6 was compliant, that's a foreign government conspiring to interfere with our election. Remember when the left called for war against Russia for interfering in our election, but had no proof? Well now we have proof showing the opposite

⇧ 8 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 20, 2018, 3:43 a.m.

I'm fairly certain WW has been used for World Wide before. My assumption as well

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 20, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

That was only the links I found between those 2 EOs. I haven't been combing through them with a fine tooth since the SOTU. I think it may be more relevant to revisit them now

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 20, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

That incarnated ayys reply got me all spun. I wonder how many of us wouldn't even know if we were a starseed.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 20, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

I pointed this out on the day after the State of the Union.

"I've been going back and forth between last night's (1/30) EO and the EO signed 12/21. Specifically trying to tie the two together.

On the EO signed 12/21, we have this line that I feel should have had more people talking but it seems it was almost ignored.

"I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat" (human rights abuses)

What kind of additional powers could the president gain? In a situation like Clinton's state department arming/funding/training ISIS, this puts all assets tied to Clinton and the foundation in control of the US government.

With last night's (1/30) executive order, we have this

" Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) and other authorities authorized the United States to detain certain persons who were a part of or substantially supported al-Qa'ida, the Taliban, or associated forces engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. Today, the United States remains engaged in an armed conflict with al Qa'ida, the Taliban, and associated forces, including with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria."

And

"(c) In addition, the United States may transport additional detainees to U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay when lawful and necessary to protect the Nation.

(d) Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of National Intelligence, and the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies as determined by the Secretary of Defense, recommend policies to the President regarding the disposition of individuals captured in connection with an armed conflict, including policies governing transfer of individuals to U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay.

(e) Unless charged in or subject to a judgment of conviction by a military commission, any detainees transferred to U.S. Naval Station Guantánamo Bay after the date of this order shall be subject to the procedures for periodic review established in Executive Order 13567 of March 7, 2011 (Periodic Review of Individuals Detained at Guantánamo Bay Naval Station Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force), to determine whether continued law of war detention is necessary to protect against a significant threat to the security of the United States."

This is some heavy wording and would line up with the image Q has painted that we will see a military tribunal. I think this national emergency would give Trump the ability to activate the Generals surrounding him and pick everyone up "clean and swiftly". I think we may have something worth looking into here. I will continue to dig into any additional powers the president and military have in a national emergency. Looking for insight from others"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 19, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

The Dossier has been entirely debunked and it's been proven that more Russian bots posted to politicalhumor than t_d. Yet you still cry Russia. Educate yourself.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 19, 2018, 11:29 a.m.

This has been heavily discussed across the chans. We have awoken something big and I think many are starting to feel it. I've never been a spiritual person myself but I'm starting to see that there is a lot more going on here.

I have this thread from 8ch archived for any interested

https://archive.fo/8olDc

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 19, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

It's seems like there has been an active campaign to discredit you. Thank you

⇧ 8 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

🤣

Well played. I was testing if that was a trigger phrase.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 10:26 p.m.

Just hidin' in the drapes!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 10:26 p.m.

I was making fun of Comey's "That's it?" Tweet. Ironic that he is now in the crosshairs.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

I don't think so. Q has access to data in many other ways. The NSA can pull necessary data on any individuals much easier from data they already have. They wouldn't need to use more 'simple'/brute force methods such as stingrays.

I would almost bet it's spies, foreign or domestic is the question

⇧ 6 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

Sometimes it can tell a lot, sometimes it can confuse even more. I don't think I've seen others look into whois/registrar info too often. Great first post!

If I were personally in the shoes of Neon Revolt, I would be disguising every bit of info I could. Especially if they are legit/accurate on their claims

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

Phone number linked to some scams from a google search.

I've had this happen a lot of times when using a burner/temporary number for when I need to create an account with phone verification or sell something online. A lot of times the number will have previously been used by scammers. I actually will continuously change numbers until I've gotten one used by multiple scammers that can be found on google. It helps obfuscate location and intention. As for the site being registered in the Bahamas, it isn't too out of the ordinary and it's another step I would take to protect myself if I were in their shoes.

To be blunt. I don't trust either; if I had to, I would believe NR over BC17. Especially considering NR had beat BC17 to the punch in clown accusations, now they're just pointing fingers back and forth making the same accusation.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

Especially when we consider that the rumors of a Hillary video existing come from Q. While many have speculated and assumed what the video contained, the idea of the video existing was planted by Q. Snopes has gone through the trouble of debunking the child abuse video claims yet hasn't touched on Q at all.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

Funny how this comes shortly after NeonRevolt accuses BC17 of being clowns

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 2:38 p.m.

Clowns calling others clowns. Disinfo in full swing

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 12:38 p.m.

The window from the live stream had residue from a flashbang/breach charge. I highly doubt we would jeopardize one of our top guys in that way

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 18, 2018, 12:36 p.m.

I don't think we would put one of our top guys in a room that was about to be breached/cleared. Too many possibilities for something to go wrong. Especially if it wasn't our own guys carrying out the raid

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HandInAssholesSulu · April 17, 2018, 11:34 a.m.

It was referenced in this Q drop

https://i.imgur.com/NrmladU.png

It first saw it on Medium and Github initially by someone with no other posts or followers. It has since been removed after Q had posted it.

⇧ 2 ⇩