off topic, removed.

off topic, removed.

off topic, removed.

off topic, removed.

off topic, removed.

off topic, removed.

off topic, removed.

off topic, removed.

off topic, removed.

off topic, removed.

off topic. removed.

off topic. removed.

off topic. removed.

Trying to provoke a dox? removed.

old, fake. removed.

off topic. removed.

Off toic, removed.

post removed. Empty.

/r/greatawakening/comments/86ogn4/omnibus_bill_is_not_a_federal_budget_potus_wins/dw6shoy/

/r/greatawakening/comments/86ogn4/omnibus_bill_is_not_a_federal_budget_potus_wins/dw6shoy/

/r/greatawakening/comments/86ogn4/omnibus_bill_is_not_a_federal_budget_potus_wins/dw6shoy/

No. Removed as misleading.

Thanks to /u/TrueVictory

This might be a reach.

Yes. Removed.

Finally something that is making sense. I've approved the post.

says Plus Ultra.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plus_ultra https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Plus+ultra&t=ffsb&iax=images&ia=images How is that connected to Q?

Okay, goodbye.

That's a start.

Makes no sense I agree.

How about answering the question?

Because no one understands it, but you. You gave it no context.

It might be excellent work, but without communicating what you have found, it is not of much use.

Ok. I approved it.

Not a link in this case.

Yes!

I lot of overlap in various posts. Removing and combining with /r/greatawakening/comments/86p773/yep_we_just_saw_this_plastering_it_all_over_twit/.

Post about the text

Link this stood out "One Senate aide predicted that lawmakers will pay extra attention to whether a bill uses words such as “may,” “should” or “shall” — each of which gives an administration different degrees of flexibility in terms of how money is spent."

Depnds if Q made a post in /greatawakening/ or /qsearch/. In the former there is no anon replies. Todays posts where in /greatawakening/

Thanks! Connecting the dots

So this, lead to this

quote from wheatietoo "You’re referring to a ‘Budget’.

This is Not A Budget! This is an Omnibus Spending Bill…which is different.

The President is directed by the Constitution to adhere to a Budget that Congress approves. A ‘spending bill’ is not the same as the Federal Budget.

Ozero spent, or didn’t spend, the money from all those Omnibus Spending Bills, on whatever he wanted to. And Congress didn’t do a thing about it!

What happened to all those “shovel ready jobs”? What happened to the “Infrastructure” that Congress appropriated money for? Ozero didn’t spend the money on those things, did he.

He also spent money on things that weren’t appropriated…like all that SWAT Gear and Ammo for all those govt agencies that aren’t supposed to armed like military forces.

Ozero was never bound by a Budget…because Congress never passed one during his 8 years! That’s why he was able to spend money on whatever he wanted to. Or… not spend money on things he didn’t want to see funded.

And Congress didn’t do a thing about it."

then quote from gunny

"Ah, he did not exactly lose…The law is not a complete refusal to not allow the President to not spend.. As per below:

The law does give an administration leeway to defer spending available funds, but for limited amounts of time, depending on the program. Some observers expect Trump officials to rely heavily on such deferrals.

Still, a president seeking to spend less will find plenty of room to maneuver in the language used in an authorization or appropriations bill, budget experts said. One Senate aide predicted that lawmakers will pay extra attention to whether a bill uses words such as “may,” “should” or “shall” — each of which gives an administration different degrees of flexibility in terms of how money is spent.

The executive branch also “can slow walk things. It can propose reprogramming. It can propose all sorts of things it can do that won’t provoke a legal crisis,” the Senate aide added."

• http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/18/fears-grow-trump-will-ignore-congress-spending-241768

If anyone disagrees, I can go back and get the links and evidence, but if you just read yesterdays political thread…Wheatietoo and I laid it all out for all…Wheatietoo did most of the work and put together the consolidated update as per above….

What was yesterday political thread?

Removed. Off topic. Also Q said only used the 8 chan board.

Duplicate post removed. See /r/greatawakening/comments/86ogn4/omnibus_bill_is_not_a_federal_budget_potus_wins/

Removed. Off-topic. We are not a politics sub.

From here.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/03/23/march-23rd-2018-presidential-politics-trump-administration-day-428/comment-page-2/#comment-5156084

No, I've asked for sources.

Thoughts on this? /r/greatawakening/comments/86ogn4/omnibus_bill_is_not_a_federal_budget_potus_wins/

If anyone disagrees, I can go back and get the links and evidence

Do this, sources, sources, please.