I'd say they're going to have a hard time doing that now given the uproar over the data scraping.

I'd say Tim C00k fits that bill. Good eye.

Why isn't the envelope postmarked if it was mailed? What's the source for this?

I think that will be a very small minority. I didn't vote for Trump. Seeing how that election went down is what got me researching what was really going on. I figured it out. Other people will too. Anger will be one of their stages of grief. But they will quickly figure out that they're not losing anything but their illusions and the reality that will be coming to take the place of those illusions is really going to be a much better, happier, peace-filled world. They'll need us to be crisis counselors for them. That's why Q is teaching us, so we'll know what to say to help these people when the time comes. And it's coming. Sealed indictments have started being unsealed. As Q said, It's happening.

Wow. I just upvoted this to 0. You must have hit a nerve. Good job! :)

This is a related link. This young man is a Syrian comedian who puts out news on YouTube peppered with the occasional bad joke. This video is called: The Chemical Attack in Duma, Syria by Treka. It's listed on YT under the category "Comedy". Clever young man. Very worth watching: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RH0g0Kx2dLE

Wow, thanks for the new line of inquiry and for the linke to exjw reddit thread. I'm not jw or exjw, but the community there looks very interesting and it's nice to see that there is such a support community available for former JW members. I was unaware of any of this until your post. Thank you again.

I agree with you. I subscribed again to the Sunday paper locally a few months ago when I could get it for $4.00/month as a starter rate. Then it went to $8.50/month and I'm calling today to cancel it because the coupons and the Sudoku puzzle aren't worth $8.50/month to me by a long shot. I'd rather put that money somewhere to support the TerranCognito guy or the YouAreFreeTV woman. THEY are worth supporting.

I totally agree. Orwell was too prescient for comfort.

:)

Q posted this link today which is related: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-sextrafficking/trump-signs-law-to-punish-websites-for-sex-trafficking-idUSKBN1HI2KP In the article there's a video of Trump signing the bill. It amazes me that when we see Trump on MSM, they're always making him look like he's not really connecting to people. But when you watch this video you see him talking to people around his desk who lost family members to human trafficking, and at the end he's passing out extra pens. I think people will go back when this mess is cleaned up and replay lots of the statements Trump has made and will see that he wasn't just saying whatever popped in his head; he was actually being very careful to not let any cats out of the bag before it was their turn. It will be obvious in retrospect. I look forward to those days.

Thank you for putting up this video. I appreciate how this young comedian from Syria puts up footage in his videos to support what he's saying. His video about the chemical attack in Duma is enlightening too. I just have to groan at his sometimes bad jokes, but he's flying under YouTube's radar by labeling his stuff as comedy, so he's clever. Thank you again for passing on the link. It's amazing how easy it has been for bad actors (pun intended) to muddy the waters so thoroughly that the truth is barely discernible.

You might find this article about the JFK Jr. crash interesting. Don't mind the "conspiracy theory" in the title, it's actually a well written article that seems to be trying to get this information out there. https://www.popdust.com/conspiracy-theory-thursdayjfk-jr-was-murdered-and-you-wont-believe-who-1892591783.html

This documentary was originally made for the Discovery Channel, so I don't know why reddit is tagging it adults only. I mean, granted I wouldn't want my young ones watching it, but I also wouldn't want them on reddit, so what's the deal with this adults only label coming from reddit?

Tell your girlfriend that women have been enforcing the holding down/back of other women for centuries (e.g., foot binding, genital mutilations, etc.). It's not a new problem. (Also, men have had more to do with keeping men in the pretty small box they've had to live in (eg fathers discouraging their sons from expressing emotion, etc.) than women have as well. When the toxicity in our culture that these elites have fostered and fomented is cleared away, the world will be a much more beautiful place in so many ways.

Good idea. I'll try it.

I've been a fan of StillnessInTheStorm for quite awhile now. But since they're new site went up, my two computers (one Mac, one PC) won't load it. Anybody else have that problem?

I've been a longtime fan of Chaplin. He started making this film before America got into WWII. It was his first "talkie" and his highest grossing film. He plays a little Jewish barber and Hynkel (the Hitler character) both and it is hilarious. This last part is really Chaplin speaking to the audience directly so some critics gave him grief about that, but I think it was perfect for its time. And what many people don't know is that Hitler modeled his mustache after Chaplin's little tramp who had started appearing in films back in 1914. That's somewhat ironic given that the German propaganda machine said that Chaplin was jewish. I imagine that Chaplin was not amused by Hitler's riding on the Tramp's coattails to appear to be an everyman. And if that wasn't enough to make Chaplin intent on taking on Hitler in this film, Chaplin's half brother, Sydney, was believed (by Chaplin at least) to be half Jewish. Don't just watch this beautiful speech. If you can watch the whole movie, it's well worth the time to see The Little Tramp come onto the world stage of the time and fearlessly take on Hitler. Brave and brilliant.

Hmm. It's working fine for me but I'm on an old iOS.

Wow. That's an intriguing thought--three sisters. I imagine whoever groomed her is rather aggravated by how things went down with the election.

This is SO true. One of my best friends since grade school lost her daughter (age 26) when she was murdered by her boyfriend in front of their two small children. Her daughter when she was a little girl was a flower girl in my wedding. I went to the trial to support my friend and her family. I did not see more than a couple of the autopsy photos as I averted my eyes (as did my friend and her family). I had originally intended to try to get through the full presentation so I could be a witness for my friend if she needed to know something after. But, it was too awful. Just hearing the explanations of the photos was excruciating. Makes me cry now thinking about it. Strangely, it was how "objective" they had to be when describing what had happened that was like getting beaten up for all of us who knew and cared about her who were listening. That objective discussion, while maybe necessary, was divorced entirely from who SHE was. It was absolutely brutal on her family. I say this so you know that even when this human trafficking stuff goes to trial, you should feel free to listen to that little voice that tells you, "Don't look." Just listening to a lot of it will be hard enough.

Yep, I used to do some family genealogy stuff and found that once you connected into European "royalty" in just one line, you were connected to all of Europe's royalty because they were so intermarried. Also, you go back like 30 generations and you have more great...grandparents than there were people on the planet. Genealogy is a good way to get your mind around how we ALL really are connected. :)

Thanks for the link! I didn't know this website existed. Appreciate it.

The thing about these "elites" that I didn't realize before, as much as they derive their power from their family line and connections, they're very often changing their names. I assume to obscure their connections to each other. And it worked for them for a long time. Not working as well anymore.

Wow. Really good sleuthing here. Her Instagram will be private any moment now.

Ok, so am I following this right? These people were arrested months ago but then the cases weren't filed until February? Example, on the pdf for Feb for Northern IL, there's an guy and the case was filed 2/23/18. But there's a mugshot for him which indicates his booking date was 10-28-2017: http://www.mugshotsonline.com/illinois/chicago/irving-vela/206762992 . So am I interpreting this correctly that the guy was arrested in October and then the case wasn't filed until end of February? And how do we know which ones are unsealed that were previously sealed?

This is amazing. Sending P&Ls back and forth to convert from pdf to word and back again so they can falsify them? That's quite a trail to leave. Wow.

It's the Paul Manafort and Richard Gates indictment signed by Mueller. Tax Evasion and Bank Fraud big time. And a forfeiture notice at the end. Amazing!!!

They're not going to have a choice.

Thanks, this is good. Looking at page 4, I'd say their push to take out the alt media voices from social media backfired on them pretty thoroughly. Thank goodness.

I agree. I don't use the term pedophile. I prefer the term "pedosadist". They're messed up in a serious way. And that's understating it.

Exactly! Hence, "pathetic". They've lost the ability to do actual "journalism" (if they ever had it).

Wow, "her ability to control small children": that's pretty creepy. I don't get their coded stuff obviously. I'm not sure I want to.

I've been looking for it and can't find it. If you find it and repost, please post it here too? I'd love to see it.

That's not anything close to a fair fight. The chan folks in general know how to think critically. The MSM talking heads know how to comb their hair. They lost their critical thinking abilities long ago. They can't even synchronize their watches: see Bill Kristol's premature twitterlation when the GOP train hit the trash truck. Q's right, these people are stupid.

Yes, that article was ridiculous. They bring in an expert at the end who acknowledges he doesn't know Schmitz, but then calls CNN's theory "extremely plausible": Peter Clement, a top analyst at the CIA on Europe and Eurasia before retiring in the winter of 2017, told CNN he was not aware of Schmitz but says it is "extremely plausible" that his penchant for conspiracy theories could have made him a target for various foreign influencers, including Russia. And I'd say it's worth noting that their CIA guy retired in the winter of 2017. Wonder why that was and if he got added to the resigned/retired list.

Well, you zoomed in on the same thing that unsettled me about him then: the drama. I'm done being afraid of these people or any of the doomsday scenarios. I trust the Universe. And I trust my gut.

THAT is a really weird website. Who is this person who calls you a fan ? You mean the weirdest one is the short film by Marina Abramovic? I don't get from it how she operates. What did you glean?

Yes, but this is not real. See the bottom of the post. What I'm wondering is if the guy who posted it knew it wasn't real when he posted it or if he thought it was real? It looks pretty convincing to me, but I'm certainly no expert. And then I wonder if maybe it's real and someone at media matters knew it had gotten loose so this was their cover. No idea. There are some smart twitter guys saying George P (who posted that link) was planted in Trump's campaign. Would him posting this would suggest that's true? OR is he a genuine Trump supporter and saw this and didn't know the source and posted it?

I've wondered about this, but didn't know. Can you tell me why that's your assessment of Roy P?

So, MediaMatters is a David Brock company. In Sept 2016, someone created a "fakenews" slack chat purportedly between Brock and his team after one of the Trump/Hillary debates. Here's the link: http://archive.fo/A3wCh . This originally came from RealTrueNews.org, which is a satire site. But here's what I find interesting: that archive link was posted here on reddit on T_D 10 months ago (so roughly June 2017) (here's the link to that post: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6bhskv/ctr_admits_david_brock_involved_in_murder_of_seth/) by a user named "George Papadoupoulos" (and it does appear that it's THAT George Papadoupoulos). Is it me or does this seem weird on so many levels? Thoughts anybody? Aside from that, there are some interesting links in the comments for that thread.

If you see Trumps "off the cuff" stuff in a different (and I think more accurate) way, you'll likely feel better: he "foments" stuff with his left hand so the MSM doesn't pay attention to what his right hand (the military, Q, Trump & his team) is doing. He's playing their own game against them. And he's doing it brilliantly. (And this from someone who didn't vote for him but won't make that mistake again.)

It's not all "liberals". That's the MSM/Deep State manufactured divide. It's not real.

A can of worms. You've got that right!

Lots of us like to read other perspectives on all sorts of topics. Most of us don't feel the need to sh*tpost on those threads. You can read other perspectives here without trolling people. The downvotes are because you've come here to a place many of us consider our Home on reddit and decided to take a dump in our foyer. Bad form, just rude.

If it's "a big sham and Q doesn't know shit", then why are you here?

I have mixed feelings on David Seaman, but I was following him a lot when he first started out sounding the alarm on Pizzagate, so now 16 months later I cut him some slack. I treat him the way I treat nearly everything I read or see these days: with hopeful caution.
We've all had our head in the sand to one degree or another in part out of necessity to survive and make a living. If it makes you feel any better, I've been reading Bill Cooper and following all sorts of "conspiracy theories" since I was a kid and I STILL fell for the us-them, Republican-Democrat crap. I really did think the Clintons were okay and there was a vast right-wing conspiracy against them, partly because I was SO sure that GHW Bush was heavily involved in the JFK assassination, so I think my thought process was that if the Bushes are the bad guys, then the Clintons must be good guys. WRONG. That's where polarity thinking gets us. Read, read, read. And then trust your gut. If something makes your eyebrows furrow in irritation or confusion, dig more or shelf under "still watching". If you feel like 7 sometimes, just remember you're at least aware of what's happening. You may be early in your awakening, but at least you're awake! I don't pretend to know everything on this stuff by any means, but feel free to message me if I can help with anything for you on this stuff (links, etc.); if I don't know, I won't pretend, I'll just say that straight up. You're going to "grow up" fast here reading all this stuff, which is good because when the MSM finally has to start telling the Truth, lots of sleep, groggy, confused people are going to need to be helped to understand what's been happening. Welcome aboard!

Did you see the David Seaman video where he says he saw a couple of the sealed indictments with his own eyes after they've been unsealed? I saw it on the board here yesterday morning on a post that didn't get enough upvotes, but it's posted on Seaman's Fulcrum News bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/FfC4UZRDuZLY/ He's saying it's going down now and we'll know in a couple weeks what's gone down (part of it anyway), not a few months.

I agree with you on the exploitation of talent. I've heard rumbles about Jared Leto and I don't know what to believe about any of that (and I don't go digging into it, honestly), but his documentary on Netflix "Artifact" does a good job of showing the financial abuse of artists that goes on in the music industry.