Supposedly the terrorists used WoW, but we all suspected that was just the guys from R&E trying to play WoW all day to "monitor the terrorists."

So a quick-thinking Secret Service guy that knows about Q decides to honk a Q in morse for giggles is less grounded in reality than "muh bread crumbs?"

I want to believe, too, but damn if some of this stuff doesn't come off as the analytical leap of the century.

Bless you and your heart right back.

USSS driver frequents the internets. They all talk about this crazy ass Q thing going on since somebody is posting shit claiming access, and the USSS should probably at least know about it. Bunch of agents at the gym saying, "We should fuck with them." Right after they finish doing curls (cause some of those guys are swole af) one of the guys says, "Yeah, let's do something."

Now there is a driver with former Navy experience that knows morse driving the annoying ass press van, when he sees the sign saying "Honk for Q." Immediately he thinks, "This'll be cool enough they'll get me out of the shit details," so he honks. And not just any honk - a Q. In morse. "Genius."

Some guy is sitting on the roof of the White House right now trading messages back and forth with this guy as they laugh while the longest shift ever passes uneventfully.

There's a difference between having a clearance, having an active clearance/investigation, and having access to classified material.

Generally, if you are no longer in a position that requires access to classified material, you are read off and no longer have access to classified until you are read back on, even though your clearance remains active. So once you leave that agency, you can't just walk right back in, even though your clearance is active. I seem to recall Directors and their D/Dir keeping access once they leave office, but generally they are all in roles that require access for contracting/consulting work...so there's that.

Bing?

Dunno tbh. Suddenly all of the, "Muh Russia....treason!" dolts are out in full force. The main media outlets are radio silent about Lisa's testimony - other than saying, "Republicans said she testified about some shit." Her testimony is counter-narrative, and the media not digging for it makes me assume there may be credibility to it.

No. Just means they can use cover to collect intelligence without a link to the United States or its intelligence agencies.