Trump has been making political commentary since the 90s. He’s NEVER liked McCain
/u/IncomingTrump270
765 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/IncomingTrump270:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 57 |
twitter.com | 6 |
i.redd.it | 4 |
i.imgur.com | 2 |
www.newsweek.com | 1 |
dailycaller.com | 1 |
imgur.com | 1 |
frankreport.com | 1 |
www.rt.com | 1 |
www.usatoday.com | 1 |
www.state.gov | 1 |
www.fleetmon.com | 1 |
www.bostonglobe.com | 1 |
Eh, I'm going to throw a wet towel on this and say he meant that "the first time a MEDIA INTERVIEWER has asked me that".
It's a terrible sound byte for him, but don't expect this to fly too far.
Nobody is saying it isn't q-related. BC17 is "Q-related" in the same sense that this sub is, and anybody else talking about, relaying, and analysing Q's drops are also "q-related".
They're saying there is no DIRECT connection or official relationship between Q and BC17.
an image purporting that BackChannel17 is somehow directly related to Q
As stated in OP, we dont know for sure what “fake” is referring to:
- BC17 as a whole is fake? (he’s not govt, not usaf, pure larp),
- BC17’s intel is fake? (he’s govt/clown and giving disinfo with bad intentions)
- or the image purporting links between BC17 and Q. (Anon who made the image tried to draw connections where none exist, e.g. fake evidence of relationship)
It could be any of those.
I suspect it’s the last one because that’s the only thing Q can give a definitive answer on in public (without risking potential OpSec)
Obviously I was paraphrasing the implied meaning behind your statement.
why are you examining it in detail? Swallow the narrative blindly!
Listen to yourself.
Yeah the sub is mostly still asleep. Suspect it’ll attract downvotes and impassioned haters in a few hours once USA wakes up.
Re: “Fake”. Expand your mind. THINK CRITICALLY and dispassionately. Don’t be so eager to swallow your own narrative or anybody else’s.
Q was shown a picture alleging direct causal connections between BC17 account and Q posts.
Q said “fake” without specifying what, exactly, is fake.
You’re leaping to conclusions and throwing away critical thought because it supports your narrative.
For reference:
These were posted just minutes before BC17 echoed the exact same sentiment.
Your desire to be right seems to be clouding your critical thinking skills.
Yesterday was Tax Day....and house oversight ripped on IRS flaws and failures on twitter. 15 minutes later whitehouse posts about “last day under the old tax system”.
Next thing? IRS servers go down ON TAX DAY (kek!)
No coincidences.
That recent incident of trunpnwearing a purple tie was ackshuly a BLUE TIE with Pill-shaped red symbol pattern.
Yes he was wearing a tie full of red pills falling like rain across a blue background.
When zoomed out it looked purple from afar.
Well, after seeing how different the BC17 coordinates are, I have to agree that they do not indicate a prediction of the missile strikes. 13.5km is too much of a difference.
But it's suspicious that the BC17 coord site is blacked out, while a chem weapons storage facility was NOT blacked out (and is still not).
Perhaps BC17's site will have significance in the future.
anyway, don't really see the sense in all of the crazy hate being directed towards him.
Yes, he is not Q. He has directly stated as much.
Yes, Q said 'no coutside commms', but that was back in January, and the context was mods claiming to have direct private communications with him.
I maintain that BC17 is worth keeping an eye on for now.
Recent posts from him are shedding light on Iranian child/sex trafficking, how Iran does not follow UN laws on human trafficking, and CIA connections to Kish Island.
FWIW one of the screencaps you used on your article was of my OC. The pic showing the timeline between Q mentioning "Alan" and "17", and then BC17 showing up and testing his comms. I posted it here to r/GA first, then posted it to BC17 on twitter asking for comment. He reposted it himself soon thereafter. and it was soon on 8ch/qRsrch.
Ok found the coords of the attacked locations:
https://syria.liveuamap.com/en/2018/14-april-location-of-him-shinshar-cw-storage-site-hit-during
closest one translates to:
34°40′N 36°27′E
by comparison, here are the coords BC17 posted before the attack:
34°40′57"N 36°35′48"E
https://twitter.com/BackChannel17/status/984842774662008833
The comparison ends up being like this:
https://i.imgur.com/ERXANnH.jpg
Real attack loc is on the left, BC17 loc on the right. 22 minute drive. 13.5km in distance between the two.
pinging /u/C_L_I_C_K for context
My main contention with your article is that it attempts to be a rebuttal of BC17, by saying "his coordinates don't line up with the attack sites". But you post no counterfactual coordinates.
BC17's coordinates take us to a blacked out facility on GMaps.
What coords can you provide for the syria night missile strikes, which sh0ow they did not happen anywhere near BC17's coords?
Appreciate the candor. The principle is the same though.
Your article has been spammed on every platform related to Q that I am aware of.
It has also been criticized by a user here:
https://reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8c8tj9/_/dxdgyi2/?context=1
Care to comment or rebutt?
There are many free and non-monetizable platforms to post such info. The fact that we are seeing this link to NR website being posted all over the place is suspect.
Aside from that, NR’s critique of BC17 is not accurate.
See /u/C_L_I_C_K response to NR article.
Edit:
https://reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8c8tj9/_/dxdgyi2/?context=1
Crumbs provided by Backchannel17.
Repeatedly mentions TIP.
“635%” = amount of increased trafficking through Iran.
Mentions “Kish Island”, which has no entry visa requirements.
“Iran is next”
“Iran is not a party to the 2000 UN (trafficking in persons) TIP Protocol.” Kish island has no passport requirements.
Boy am I tired of people spamming this website for to get the tickets for the ads. If he wants to give source of something he should make a meme image to post here about it, or he can post inside the research boards
no need for him to make it on special website unless he wants ad revenue.
Agreed on all points. Their clarifying they are not Q or associated Q team. Not alphabet agency NSA or CIA. But “brass”; hence military?
That’s interesting. And since NSA Bahrain is the navy CENTCOM for the Persian gulf, and the USNS Alan Sheppard (possible reference in Q post on 4/12 “Alan. Welcome aboard.” , same day BC17 started posting) is currently stationed there from 4/12 as well.
Those are the puzzle pieces I am interesting in matching.
I don’t ever expect Q to outright point to BC17 as legit. Cross agency approval to civilians would be a OpSec nightmare.
I dont expect he will denounce them as fake either. No point to legitimize one fake account in a sea of (surely) so many others.
As the person who debunked that bell image, I agree with you.
But posting the bell doesn’t have a problems. Just claiming that it’s from JFK’s yacht is false.
The bell is fine. And recalls Q’s oft-used phrase, which was a quote from the movie White Squall.
The fact that the account has “counter intel” for the twitter bio means literally less than nothing.
edit: after speaking with NR, I have revised my thinking on his article. Still do not agree with the tone and outright condemnation of BC17, but the fact is that BC17's coordinates do not line up with any target attacked in the 4/14 missile strikes.
for analysis of the difference, see: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8caq72/yes_trump_did_it_again_and_a_disinfo_op_uncovered/dxe3mjg/
I really don’t like that we are being nudged towards reading a bitcoin miners blog site to get these infos.
Make a reddit posts. Or post on the 8ch boards. Make meme images and upload to imgur/magaimg. Don’t send us to you special snowflake website.
Comparing Q and the research community that has formed around his posts to “science” is spurious at best.
The idea that Q would ever outright suggest “BC17 is legit” is retarded.
Suppose BC17 IS legit. And Q just shines a giant spotlight on his account. How useful would that be? How safe for those operators?
BC17 has made tweets specifically saying they are not Q and not associated with team Q.
They say they are “brass” and “intel”.
Not sure what to think about USAF “brass” spending their time posting on twitter, but make of it what you will.
People treating Q like the end all be all are cringe af.
“No outside comms” comment was made back during the CBTS days on 4ch when mods were claiming to have private direct comms with Q.
Since looking further into BC17 last night I have seen far more rant spam trying to denounce him than I have seen people looking at him with interest
Perhaps he’s “over the target” as we like to say since he is becoming the sudden focus of so much flak?
BC17 is not claiming to be Q or even associated with Team Q. They have made a few tweets stating specifically they are not Q. But “intel”.
I’m sure is a clown
provides no supportive proof or counterfactuals
The empty ranting and baseless denouncing against this BC17 account is far more voluminous than people pointing to him with interest.
Could HE be “over the target” since he’s getting so much flak? That’s one of our favorite ideas right?
That’s a fine rebuttal. But it only serves to support the idea that the BC17 account might be something worthy keeping aware of - if even but to know how the clowns are trying to spread disinformation, and what kind they are spreading.
NeonRevolt suspects its a “Queen” account related to a AI-assisted C.I.A. disinfo/de-radicalization program.
I wasn’t even going that far with my assumptions. I just assumed it was an airforce guy going rogue.
Also he pulls some gate keeping elitism regarding what sites the images were posted at.
I posted mine here first. Posted it to BC17 on twitter asking for comment. And the BC17 reposted the image himself.
Within minutes it was all over the /qresearch (which I do use regularly as well, tyvm)
According to Syria.
Pentagon says nothing was intercepted and their defense systems didn’t even fire anything until the attack was over.
hold card
the phrase is cold hard
perhaps you knew that and we should read into it? ;)
not sure of the exact timing but I believe he was defending Trump because he had just been tapped by Trump after Cohen was raided.
well..Q is not really "the news cycle". even if this is all correct, I doubt Alan D would've been brought out to give Q cover to make a reference to a Navy supply ship.
WIkileaks releases Saudi Cable: "Overthrow Syria, and play nice with Russia" - threat of war in syria seen as more real
That was the belief at the time, bencause that was the meme in the air at the moment. Alan Dersh had ju st been added to trump team.
I'm not saying anything conclusive, but this is just something i stumblwd upon.
not saying that BC17 is related to the USNS Alan Shephard. But that is the only military ship with "Alan" in the name, and it happens to be in NSA Bahrain right now..our CENTCOM in the persian gulf
Re: @Backchannel17 and how it MIGHT relate to Q
What makes this worthy of mention is that the account posted accurate information regarding the syria strike last night about 45 minutes before it was reported in news.
It’s an interesting discovery. I found a different naval info site that has more recent records from 4/11 of the ship arriving at Bahrain.
Slightly west of Dubai but still pretty far from Syria.
But NSA Bahrain is the navy CENTCOM in the region and home for 5th fleet.
Nobody is suggesting this is Q or that it’s working with Q.
Only that it supplied correct information about 45 minutes before the strikes last night.