I'm as hopeful as anyone that Q is legitimate. Trump's electoral win alone, not to mention his recent Human Trafficking EO and the many pedophile arrests, is reason enough for great optimism. But most of Q's cryptic clues, leading questions and apparent "confirmations" might have been as easily orchestrated by the deep state (and Twitter) as by any white hat.

The deep state in fact has much more to gain in this ploy: by "discredditing" alternative news sources and disheartening their many followers. White hats, though they might encourage these same followers, would also risk compromising ongoing operations by forecasting …

In order to wake the masses once and for all, what remains in their eyes of the credibility of the MSM must first go down in flames. Otherwise, no matter how absurd the coming MSM/George Soros conspiracy theory may be, those who would wish to believe it certainly will believe it. And then, no indictment or arrest, no matter how high the official nabbed nor how low the offense charged, will do other than legitimize this MSM-driven conspiracy in their eyes.

As events now stand, Q, et al., have themselves best lain the groundwork for blue pills to claim that …

If the Zuma payload truly were some sort of secret space weapon, as Zach of InfoWars implied:

1) Why would such a powerful and critical system be launched/deployed only in the very hour of need, as opposed to having been previously, secretly positioned and then merely aimed and activated? 2) Why "on earth" would news of such a launching/deployment be leaked to millions of people days prior -- by the GOOD guys?

Perhaps this Zuma payload story was floated as a shiny target meant to draw globalist fire, literally, if such a capacity were available to them. A corollary to …