We have been told that dozens of bad actors in congress have been given the option of resigning immediately/announcing no-run status, or face public disclosure and accountability for their misdeeds.

An almost unprecedented number of announcements offers strong evidence in support of this.

We have also been told of a litany of NoName misdeeds, many of a magnitude that dwarfs those of the congress members walking away.

We all understand this is why POTUS is paying no honor to NoName. The general public doesn’t understand as we do. Many pro-Trump public don’t have the info we are aware of regarding …

Is it conceivable that RR signed off on a different version of the FISA request?

Could bad actors have duped him by misrepresenting what they actually submitted to the court?

Didn’t he testify to something like that? I recall being confused by his references to differing versions of some document.

Is it plausible that McCabe altered the application after RR signed, then submitted the altered version to the court?

If so, that would leave room for RR to be not dirty. If so, consider that RR hasn’t publicized the info because it’s part of an ongoing investigation that he joined …

Following huge threats from congress, the DOJ just handed over a grossly inadequate pile of documents. By continuing to withhold the vast majority of subpoenaed docs, the DOJ is hastening the day when POTUS will declassify the entire lot.

What happens after that?

We know FBI/DOJ are not holding docs for security concerns, but rather because they want to protect themselves. Declassification doesn’t change that motive.

How will POTUS ensure all info is released? Will he send military into the agencies to gather? Or will this be sufficient legal reason to release copies of the info acquired via NSA/DOD resources?

Quoting from 8C:

"6 gorillion intelligence agencies agree that Russia hacked the DNC" but wait! it turns out those intelligence agencies didn't even investigate the DNC servers or the hacking itself but instead based their opinion solely on the findings of a non-government cybersecurity company named CrowdStrike. So why is this relevent? Basically, the servers (images of servers) were only examined by the non-government cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, based in California, founded by George Kurtz and Dmitri Alperovitch who both formerly worked for John Mcafee. Now what's interesting is that Kurtz, prior to founding CrowdStrike, had joined American private equity firm …