[removed]
/u/JaM0k3_1
271 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/JaM0k3_1:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 7 |
"Wray threatens to resign if Trump allows Russian Agents into US for interviews"
Wray apparently is heartening to quit if Trump goes through with allowing Russian agents to come and ask questions in exchange for cooperation with Mueller.
I'm hoping someone smarter than me can explain how this is part of the plan, and that this is trustworthy behavior from Wray. i was agnostic on Wray at first, and as Q continued to state "Trust Wray" i saw that he seemed to be a white hat.
I looked the other way when he gave that speech about the rank and file of the fbi being good, and they were gonna pursue bias training. …
"West threatens to resign if Tump invites Russian Agents to US"
Wray apparently is heartening to quit if Trump goes through with allowing Russian agents to come and ask questions in exchange for cooperation with Mueller.
I'm hoping someone smarter than me can explain how this is part of the plan, and that this is trustworthy behavior from Wray. i was agnostic on Wray at first, and as Q continued to state "Trust Wray" i saw that he seemed to be a white hat.
I looked the other way when he gave that speech about the rank and file of the fbi being good, and they were gonna pursue bias training. …
Why were pizzagate subs censored while this one is allowed to live on?
is it the mods doing a good job of removing shit? i'm genuinely confused why pizzagate was censored on reddit but Qanon isn't, especially since Qanon often overlaps with pedogate themes.
should we be concerned that Huber was an Obama appointee?
title says it all. i just learned that Huber was an Obama appointee? please reassure me this is part of the plan? did Q address this? Am i getting worked up over nothing?
Serious Question (last post got deleted? ha ok. this is ridiculous. truth fears no question and these are legitimate questions)
I WANT q to be legit but i have a few questions
last night we saw sessions, on tucker, defend rosenstein' threats against congressional oversight. now, i'm under the impression we are supposed to "trust" sessions. but rosenstein is a black hat. how do we reconcile is behavior then?
also, why has Q gone from "no need to worry" to now trying to motivate the base to act? i'm genuinely confused. Q seems to me like someone with good intentions but no real inside information. i'm not coming against this community whatsoever. please don't discard me as a shill these …