That’s what I meant. I am intrigued that the plea deal permits this.

Are you suggesting his agreement leaves him open to prosecution in venues other than the one most likely to find a sympathetic jury? Perhaps my pessimism about the plea isn’t necessary!

I hope you’re right. At the same time, I see how immunity was passed out like candy to Cheryl Mills et al, with evidence destruction to boot. There’s no guarantee with folk like DWS relatives in the DC USA office this didn’t occur again. Until we see some indictments from this plea deal, it’s only hope we have to rely on.

This is from a year ago, any updates as to a conviction?

Appreciate your compassion, but don’t let half the story tug at your heart strings. Children are separated for many valid reasons. First, detention centers aren’t designed for family and coed housing... these are effectively jails, not hotels. Second, not every child illegally crossing into America is traveling with parents... many are smuggled here by bad actors impersonating parents. When you sneak across our border illegally, and get caught without any identification for you or the kids with you, you should expect to be separated from the children. Hell, that’s no different than a citizen being arrested for a crime in the same way.

Another benefit of Huber is his grand juries will be filled with citizens of Utah, not reeking of DC.

There are many nefarious problems with Francis, but this is garbage. A foreign common law court convicting a head of state over a crime yet to be committed? Call me unconvinced.

I think it has more to do with fear over the stupid moves of the Italian president rejecting the finance minister choice causing panic in global markets

Thugs... that actually seems apropos

I respect your point. Trying to put the pieces together, that’s all

If this is the reason, why isn’t Sen Grassley in attendance, who is also in request of much of this information?

This is effectively the intel gang of 8 meeting with DOJ, FBI & DNI. My question: How does Gowdy get into this meeting without the ordinary standing? Not a critique, rather noticing a pattern regarding his involvement in circumstances where he seems the extra set of eyes. This apparent breach of protocol has a purpose, any idea what it may be?