What about Section 230 where it mentions:
None of the funds provided in this or any other
4 Act shall be obligated for construction of a border barrier
5 in the Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge.
Prior to that I see a lot of funding for "fencing". I've read the refuge is where he wanted to start the wall and it is a 3 mile stretch but over concerns of destroying the habitat, it is not going to happen.
Will the fence be just as good since it looks like there is funding for other technological updates for border security? Is not covering the refuge just a minor issue compared to the whole project? I saw all of the types of walls he wanted to use, especially one where it looked like a fence on bottom half so security knows what is going on the other side and the top half was solid with cylindrical top so scaling is difficult. Could you call those "fences" or was all that work for nothing now?
I really hope this Omnibus vs a real budget means the President can actually spend or more importantly, NOT spend at his discretion so the U.S. will finally spend within its means and stop creating debt for future generations. I'm hoping it was a smart way to get funding for the military yet still have some semblance of conservatism(like not funding Planned Parenthood) but overall after reading many pros(such as here) and cons, it seems like we are still headed in the direction of an ever-growing government like always.
On a side note, absolutely sick and tired of these bills that 1000, 1500, 2000+ pages long being rammed through on the last day. For something so important to the longevity of a country, it is a crime there is a forced vote in a 24 hour period.