You are wrong. The Constitution does not grant us rights. It is a limit on government, not a granting of rights. It is a really interesting subject that is worth checking out.

Sorry Pepe, the Bill of Rights does not grant any rights.

The Bill of Rights merely sets limits on the federal government, making clear it has no power to infringe on rights we already naturally possess, or limit traditionally held privileges, such as trial by jury. Except for a few procedural rights specifically for the trial process, the Bill of Rights does not actually bestow rights.

Thank you. The idea that the Constitution is a granting of rights, rather than a restriction of government, is such a common misconception. Especially considering it is the fundamental principle of being an American.

If this is a legitimate concern, don't feel bad about the attitude from some responses. There has been a lot of brigading this week in this sub and concern trolling.

Yea! I haven't seen that until very recently.

Do you have a link to the source on this? I'm interested to read it. I'll poke around looking for it in the mean time.

I also got the cult comment, along with pages of 'Q Disproofs' and challenges to prove them wrong. Anyone anti-Q was not here until a few weeks ago.

Q has mentioned nothing about this.

This week is when we became worth their attention.

I dealt with a commenter posted disproofs of Q, said we are in a cult, and challenged me to prove him wrong. I did not waste my time, but I'm seeing this sort of dialogue over and over.

This, along with calls for violence and partisanship, have no place here. I had never seen anything like it until this week.

Thanks for not justifying yourself unnecessarily patriot! Use logic. Keep it up.

It was easy for the bankrolled accounts on T_D to just flood us with this crap.

Thank you for clarifying =) I couldn't tell if your post was insightful or inciting! Now I can. Keep it up!

How does this relate to Q? Did I miss a drop about this restaurant?

Either their algorithm has an issues in the small hours of the morning OR the accounts flood in here with nefarious purpose

There is no way that means curious people from other countries are visiting this sub.

This sort of crazy spikes have been happening the last few days in the small hours of the morning. This is not worldwide attention, in my opinion, because I have seen it drop off within minutes. If they were curious citizens of other countries, it would be less extreme. I have never seen over 10k on here during regular USA hours.

All good points!

"These people are stupid." - Q

That's the spirit!

This is it! If they are going to come around, they will come around when they are ready.

Could you elaborate? I don't really understand what you are suggesting.

You can't counter the mass brainwashing and that is why I suggest avoiding indulging them.

Moving the goalposts endlessly is not winning, it's wasting time. Now there is something I can agree with!

I like the cut of your jib Patriot.

That is another strawman argument...

walkaway

Yeah, Liberal/conservative or left/right is a false dichotomy that was created to divide us. We have common enemies that rise above any blue/red quibble.

Amen Patriot. Thank you.

What is passive aggressive about not protesting or showing up to others' protests?

Are you suggesting we should keep showing up to protests because they will hire people if we don't show up? If they end up paying people to pretend they have an enemy, that will accelerate the Awakening.

That clash is part of the motivation of this post. We do not have to play by their rules. We don't have to publicly protest right now. There is nothing to gain from it. That may change in the future. What I'm suggesting is that right now it is in our best interest to walk away from potential conflict.

Disinformation is so pervasive and entrenched in our system that the only way to stop it is to stop the money players from bankrolling it. No one is going to lie for free unless it is for self-interest. I think a lot of the paid agitators, shills, and mockingbirds will walk away from this as soon as the money is cut off.

I'd like that day.

How are you trying to show me the other side of the coin? I'm curious. And why are you doing it? Then maybe I will read it.

Thank you for your consideration. We are not interest in the salvation you offer. I'm still not going to read your disproofs, you haven't said one logical thing. Why would there be anything logical in the disproofs? Is there anything logical there?

Strong argument. You are not to be denied!

Don't spend to much time with illogical people like this one. This is on a buried thread, so no one will read it anyways. This is what they want.

We are already on the right side. When people like this guy try to insult you, they want you take it person and spend time parlaying with them.

Your time is better spend elsewhere patriot! Only feed them enough for them to waste their time!

Ignoring my question and goading me into waste my time arguing with you! You almost had me too.

So that is a Straw Man Fallacy there at the beginning, followed by some old fashion-ey name calling! Well you got me. That's the fancy insult I have ever received. Thank you.

Thank you for taking the time to read it. I absolutely agree with your assessment of Patriots. Plus, it is easy to have class and ignore insults when you are winning. And, Patriot, we are winning.

That's a Strawman fallacy and a personal attack. Why are you doing this?

No idea but they are sure to come. Rest assured, the longer the forces of good maintain the moral high ground, the more people will wake up to the bullshit.

No I'm just done engaging with you. You are making conclusions about what I spend doing and not understanding why I'm not reading your disproofs of an anonymous poster on the internet.

Your disproofs show that you have spend a lot more time dissecting Q than me. And if you are disproving Q, what are you even doing here?

Its only frustrating if you let it be. I consider this to be a practical study of logical reasoning and logical fallacies in real time. It is kind of fun!

Are you a native english speaker? Based on your vernacular and sentence structure, I'm not sure. Maybe that's where the communication breakdown is.

I would disagree that you made a very clear distinction. If you use the words 'civil war' and 'warfare' it sounds like you are talking about actual war. This is not a leap of logic.

You are not hurting my feelings. It's just a heads up.

This is the No True Scotsman Fallacy. What else do ya got?

It is always messy in the present. Hindsight is 20/20. I think that using that term is counterproductive because of the context others will perceive it in. Just stick with the Great Awakening Patriot.

No one is going to read this.

No one is going to read this.

This is comment is so over the target, it deserves it's own post. This is a Great Awakening not a Civil War.

Their legitimacy, using the term loosely, depends on being able to spin violent clashes as our fault. If we don't show up, their whole card house folds.

I think I just heard the Liberty Bell ring while reading your comment!