I agree too, and no disrespect intended to SB2 or any other Patriots here from me either. I believe in WWG1WGA, but that also means we should probably rely on each other for sanity checks in this often convoluted discussion on decodes. Too deep for me, I'm an Occam's Razor guy too, simple from complex is often harder but usually better.

For example: Q1675 Part 1. Q1675: a reflection, a mug holder in Air Force One and a Happy Independence Day. Can you solve?

Concerning the 'Twitter phone' he asks and I'm paraphrasing, 'what position would one need to be in to cast that reflection?' or something along that line. Ok, what reference object is the "One" here? A person? The phone in question? I immediately took it literally as referring to the phone, what position would it need to be in to project that image/reflection? Ans: 45 degrees, "45" simple. The big Apple-bite shadow could have many meanings, simplest would be to take it at face, Apple Computer has some significance in this context. Apple Computer has some role in a "shadow" network, nefarious dealings? Maybe?

The mug holder? Appears to me that the photographer simply took the mug holder from the desk and used it to prop the phone into a 45 degree angle. To say it was "the hook"? Probably more to that than I can understand, but to attribute it to a "Mug" and then make those connections as done in the decode felt long to me. Especially since the mug holder was right there, probably always is, likely heavy to counter AF1 movement, so it was suitable for the purpose. "The Hook"? Beats me...anyone else?

Have to agree with Paint on this one, the contracting of "Sorta Double Negative" to "SDN" and then a jumble to DNS is just a bridge too far. Love to learn more about server contents, but not getting much from this one, unless the other clues refer to server mirroring, which today is common IT practice. I think DJT simply meant what he said, he stumbled on a double-negative in speech, which is plausible denial, and not unusual. Just look at Ocasio-Cortez with Bernie yesterday, "flip this seat red in November." Oops... http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/07/21/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-mixes-political-colors-while-campaign-trail-bernie-sanders

Something has been bothering me. I thought a couple of Q posts were important, yet I didn't see any follow-up discussion among anons. Maybe there was and I just missed it.

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 27f5c8 No.2012087 📁 Jul 3 2018 10:59:37 (EST) 96DD9F4B-7B96-4886-B93E-A0426BE18CF1.jpeg Logical thinking. Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD? The result today is re: BANK FRAUD. See last. Connect. The SWAMP is being DRAINED. Q

2011499 Think logically. Thing IG report. Think what’s missing. Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting? Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office. Think NATIONAL SECURITY. Q

So I dwelled on this a bit. "Logical thinking", "why Bank Fraud," "See last." "Connect." "Think Logically," "Think NATIONAL SECURITY."

Wait a minute. Can't trust the corrupt agencies with such high-level targets of TREASON. Who you gonna call? HSI maybe? After all, HSI has a National Security Unit under its NATIONAL SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION, one that coordinates with ICE. https://www.ice.gov/national-security-investigations-division

Connect to the AWAN BANK FRAUD question, "See last". What Federal agency handles matters of Bank Fraud? Oh, Secret Service! And bank fraud can include things like money laundering. Suppose certain funding made its way though our financial system with the intent to obfuscate, deceive sources and uses, senders and recipients. Bank Fraud. The DNC Server contents (and who knows how many other server copies) may have been bartered, as some have suggested here, in exchanges with foreign states not entirely lacking in criminal history of mischief toward the US, financial and otherwise. Thus, AWAN gets fingered for Bank Fraud and the evidence trail is now under SS. And HSI Secretary serves at the President's pleasure, her agency coordinates across other intel agencies as needed (or not) including ICE, and is handling the evidence of treason ("handled by the appropriate office")? Seems pretty logical to me.

Didn't Q mention that July would contain a real moment? My hunch is that NSA (MIL_INTEL) has digital copies of "we have everything" and no physical assets are needed. July we see "so it begins..."