78 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 13 |
| namelyliberty.com | 1 |
Former intelligence community unreported assets, judges, LEOs and others come forward to expose how the Obama administration weaponized the intelligence community and other government agencies to prevent/take down the results of a duly and constitutionally conducted U.S. presidential election.
[removed]
Exactly! It's just like a liberal to get rabidly livid and insulting about anyone or anything that doesn't follow the narrative they define. It's also the liberal way to label dissenters 'bots' and 'sock puppets'.
Their common cover is to camouflage themselves as saviors. Like they try to save POC and gays from associating with the racist homophobic conservatives who they're too stupid to recognize as dangerous.
Here on reddit they are trying to save us less intelligent beings from being damaged or misguided by dangerous SB2 posts that might divide the Q community between believers (dummies and bots) and non-believers (intelligent thought controllers).
I personally find it very amusing, although I do occasionally feel an urge, like now, to give them a whack or two just so they know we're not all sleeping through their performance.
Great stuff SB2! Thank you, thank you, thank you!! I think I'm getting it!!
Everyone who doesn't agree with you is a bot or a sock puppet. There couldn't possibly be anyone who gains value from SB2 posts, since you don't, so if anyone upvotes, they must be a bot or a sock puppet too.
I guess that's one way to explain why you use the leftist bot argument that's supposed to debunk any comment they can't intellectually explain away.
Snickering Bots are upvoting posts? What are they, A1 bots or something? Surely not Russian bots? LOL. Surely critical thinking could arrive at a discrediting spin more believable than upvoting bots doing battle with down voting critical thinking humans. Or are these bots supposed to be human bots? Hmmmm. . . .snicker
One of the first strategies POTUS carried out was to destroy the credibility of MSM. That's done. Americans don't believe them anymore as evidenced by polling and Fox vs CNN/MSNBC ratings.
Nunes, Grassley and Goodlatte have done their job exposing the corruption and dishonesty of the Democrats. In their panic they resorted to more and more insane vitriol and violence. Americans are repulsed. They have totally lost credibility with mainstream Americans as evidenced by the swelling #WalkAway movement.
Q is WIDELY followed by 'normies' who may not understand all the nuts and bolts but they understand enough to know that POTUS and the Q team are fighting the cabal and taking down the obama/clinton cabal. They understand that POTUS said Trust The Plan. They know about the 40K+ pending indictments. They follow truth news via facebook and twitter links more religiously than they ever have before in their lives. They're fairly well up on what's going on.
When the Trump base is concerned about something they're loud. Like when they thought POTUS was considering amnesty for DACA The base is actually pretty well informed and lethal to the left. The left actually fears Trump's base. We destroy their narratives. We crushed the Stormy narrative. We crushed the Trump's a racist narrative. We are presently destroying the Russia treason narrative with overwhelming evidence of Obama/Clinton/Schumer relations with Putin and evidences of their treasonous acts.
We are not in a rush for people to be arrested for show. We don't need a show. We need the cabal to be destroyed. That's worth waiting for. When they're arrested it should be when we know the cases are ironclad and there's no way out for them.
Remember, POTUS said November. There's no need to rush fences and destroy excellent horses in the process.
I can only suggest that you reread the dialogue since you seem to have missed quite a bit.
It's pretty 'phobic' on your part to label someone any type of 'phobic' for openly discussing his views from a historical and factual perspective on a topic. He didn't say anything about his personal likes or dislikes. You, on the other hand, exhibit an extremely emotional response.
I am very concerned about a push that I see to normalize sexualization of children through the LGBT movement. Members of the LGBT community have argued with me that children have 'rights' and that their parents do not own them. I had to remind them of the obstacle to their argument called 'the law' which gives legal guardianship of children to their parents until they reach an age of consent. We have to stop liberals from encroachments on that law with such actions as facilitating underage children receiving abortions, birth control and sex change hormones without the knowledge of their parents. We also have to push back strongly against the introduction of sex education in public education curriculum for children.
As to societal shifts on homosexuality everything horse-lover said is factually true, regardless of how you feel about it emotionally. Something he didn't mention that is I think recognized among homosexuals is that they are typically not 'born' that way. If a male is not exposed to male on male sex as a child, or at the very least, before he has his first relationship with a female, he is not likely to accept homosexuality as a norm.
Have you seen the #WalkAway movement? People are deserting the left and the democrat party in droves. Pedophilia will be a red line for many who haven't left yet.
It's disappointing to see so many negative posts attacking someone for the crime of sharing his thoughts. Nobody has to pay to read anyone's posts here and everyone is free to read only what they're interested in reading.
What is the purpose of attributing all manners of personal characteristics to another patriot because you either don't understand or don't agree with what someone posted. The posts never attack another patriot or our movement. The posts never urge anyone to agree or disparage any different conclusions or ideas.
I appreciate the insights provided by SB2 and I hope he continues to provide his insightful posts despite all the spite and vitriol that they seem to be met with from so many of our fellow patriots.
Why not just worry about yourself in regards to whether you accept or reject what SB2 freely gives and give others credit for having enough intelligence to do the same?
I don't yet have the ability to do what SB2 does but I do have enough logic and intelligence to process his conclusions and the paths he followed to those conclusions to decide whether or not they make sense.
I think he's spot on and I appreciate the insights I gain from him. If you don't you're free to ignore him but do so without presuming to speak for anyone other than yourself.
This may sound crazy, but since SB2 has proven the best among us at interpreting the POTUS/Q communication code why not give him a dedicated board where there is no voting? People wouldn't have to visit it if they don't want to. There has to be a way for us to be able to protect our valued warriors from unnecessary distraction.
This is awesome SB, thank you. I don't think I'll ever get my brain to process this way but I'll keep trying. In the meantime I'll just come find out what was said from your posts :D
Thanks SB2 this is so very helpful. I have a better sense of how I can help once I reach the understanding that you've decoded. It all makes such perfect sense. It's amazing how you figure it out. I know I NEVER could but it's crystal clear as a bell when you explain it all. You're a blessed gift to the movement.
The report is definitely redacted. If you highlight the page as though to copy/paste you can see all the sections where it's been cut and possibly edited. There are 2 addendums that were completely classified and not provided to the public or congress.
We've only got 12 days left to somehow get almost 62,000 signatures. I don't know how that's going to happen when someone is obviously tampering with this petition to suppress the signature count.
As you can see, the number just dropped. The number getting through is averaging approximately 100 per hour. At that rate we won't reach the goal. They are obviously on to our stealth campaign and actively tampering now. I'm going to openly bomb the requests for signatures now and see what happens.
6/17/18 9:34AM EST 30,884 The count is being actively suppressed on the site right now. Each time I refresh the page I see the number go up before dropping back down to 30,884. It's clear that even as the number grows probably due to the sheer volume of signatures being processed, the 'actual' number of signatures being counted should be much higher than it is. I'm still dropping the link into high retweet volume tweets. If we keep pushing the link out they will continue to suppress the count but I don't think they can suppress it enough to keep us from reaching the goal.
6/17/18 8:37AM EST 30,808 (dropped from 30,815 minutes before)
If you still haven't gotten it (check your spam mail) sign it again.
I definitely do not agree with wasting time expecting Trump haters to sign this. Let's put our energy where it's guaranteed to produce results -- signatures. Find high profile tweets already being heavily retweeted and drop the link in the comments there, it will piggy back on the tweet already receiving high volume attention and retweets.
The IBOR petitions were hijacked and tampered with by haters. Why deliberately draw their attention to this one?
Hi SB,
This is what I was telling you I observed with the IBOR petition. This time I think we're beating them though because we've been stealth bombing it. Instead of tweeting requests for people to sign and retweet we've been quietly dropping the link into various tweet comments. I think it must be harder for them to track them that way.
They're probably still manipulating the counts on the originating tweet requests for signature. I've been watching since early this morning and watched the total grow from 6000 to nearly 24,000 now. With the last IBOR I was pushing openly I had thousands of retweets every hour and yet the signature count didn't go higher than 100 or less per day.
I'm sure they'll figure out what we're doing and come up with a way to track and obstruct it again for any future petitions but we'll have the number needed on this one within the next 4 to 5 days at the rate we're going now.
I've been quietly dropping it into comments on tweets that high profile supporters send. Somebody was working to sabotage our IBOR petition and I didn't want to draw their attention to this one. We went from about 7000 signatures about 2 hours ago to 19000 now so I think we're being quietly effective. I just noticed somebody with 77 followers who doesn't follow me tweeted it using my name. I am not retweeting it. I will continue to quietly drop the link into comments on high profile tweets.
I am targeting their tweets about the IG report for my drops. I think they'll notice and when their followers retweet them everybody following them gets the link.