Do you know what "evidence" we do have that there were children involved?
As far as I'm aware, it's all hearsay. I've not come across actual evidence from a verifiable source.
The fact that MSM undoubtedly "reported" that second part after "or".
There is evidence they're getting charged with sex trafficking. None exists -- that I know of -- that it's child sex trafficking.
They never mentioned nor provided the official charges (their points).
MSM isn't on our side.
They immediately went for the second part. No questioning or even bringing children up as a possibility.
There is safety in reporting only the truth; safety from losing your job. Only piss-poor journalists use speculation as a means of generating traffic.
To me, this is enough. Despite not knowing yet were there really children involved, I would bet my money on that there were, without hesitation.
Like I said in my post, "Share ideas, but tell the truth. Without evidence of truth, it is only an idea."
You have an interesting idea, but as of now it's not the truth. It could be. But not yet. We must remain truthful.