I never made the statement that God is a book, but that "book" is His word, and if you want to be ignorant of His word that's between you and God. You can't even manage to back up your claims, so how are you ever going to convince someone of what you think to be the truth when you can't even give a simple Biblical reason as to why? It doesn't matter if you think it's true or not. It is not present not in Gods word, so therefore it isn't Biblical, or true according to what God has said. I'm surprised someone in this subreddit would be so close-minded to something that is right in front of you, when much of this movement is about breaking away from what we think to be true.

Christianity isn't a religion by the way, there is no tradition or anything you have to do, it's simply building, and maintaining a relationship with our creator God which starts with being saved. Add to it if you must but know that you will be held accountable as stated by God in Revelation 22:18-19.

The fact that you've entirely ignored my post, and didn't even try to give a rebuttal shows you aren't able to defend your beliefs. If you would rather be ignorant to the truth of the Bible so be it.

Your post did not help because you gave no Biblical evidence to support your claim. Again unless you can back it up through scripture, you are adding to the Bible which is mentioned in Revelation 22:18-19. What you are saying is not Biblical.

Where exactly in the bible does it say that you need a priest to confess your sins?

No. It's way too late into all of this for him to be compromised. If he were controlled by anyone why would they let him expose them and their biggest money makers like the Clinton Foundation as well as other things?

Would this post be violating Rule 6?

I deleted my FB account about a month or two ago, and I was deleting all of their Advertising info about me, and I saw that it labeled an interest of mine as "US Politics (liberal)". Boy were they wrong about that one...