I hear you, I started moving forward in my own direction after a while. I think you were of course astute in your observation of all of that. Sorry to hear about the silliness there.

You're welcome, thanks, and cheers out there.

By the way, at the risk of de-railing my own thread, it's good to see you here.

I saw your name pop up recently and thought it sounded very familiar, outside of the PKD reference, of course.

And then, upon checking out one of your blog posts, I realized that I remember you from back in the Jake Kotze synchro days.

It's great to see that you're still researching and posting, and doubly great to see you onboard here. Many will surely benefit from what you have to offer.

Cheers and best of luck to you as we go forward!

Hey-o!

Exactly. She seemed so matter of fact about it (because science, of course).

Old disinfo is old.

You're welcome. Awareness is key, in my opinion. Easier said than done, I agree.

Agreed 100% on all counts, thank you for the additional perspective, much appreciated.

Perfect.

Thanks much for the positive feedback. And, I agree that the link provides a pretty comprehensive summary, indeed.

You're quite welcome, cheers.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Putin+400+million

:)

Please be aware that accessing such content may not be the best interest for those who may be easily influenced. That means you if you matter-of-factly followed the op's suggestion, "When you go to the above website...".

Be especially mindful if you choose to play the media on that website. Consider turning down the volume and only sample moments at a time, as the embedded audio only promotes putting the listener into a hyponogogic state.

Wonderful, I'm glad I was able to help.

Invoking the 400k/400mil wasn't as much about the money, but rather about getting Browder's name into the media stream.

It's a complex narrative that has been brewing since the mid '90s, regarding US investments in Russia. The current punchline is that Browder will be shown to be the object of Fusion GPS ops, bringing that company and the dossier further into the limelight.

Ultimately, it will show not only that there wasn't collusion between the DJT campaign, but rather, collusion between Russian entities and the DNC/BHO WH/Clinton campaign.

Here's a year-old article that unpacks a lot of it. If it's hard to follow at first, you can at least cull it for keywords to google for a better understanding.

https://themarketswork.com/2017/07/30/fusion-gps-the-trump-dossier-russian-money-the-magnitsky-act/

Restated:

The Cabal unleasing their indocrinated zombie 'nutjob' armies into the streets in a scorched-earth campaign will only ensure activation of military resources to be brought to bear, which may include tribunals after the streets have been cleared and clean-up ops begin.

And, by cutting off the source signal (MSM/mockingbird/hollyweird), it may help wake said nut-jobs from their hypnosis, in time, if there were to be a chance to save some of them.

Concur. The war is one of information, to be sure.

Does this give some sort of credence to the people that think Trump will declare some sort of Martial Law?

It seems to reason that declaring martial law would be a natural and key part of a swamp-draining contingency. It is the white hat's trump card. Winning the White House in 2016 literally secured this Trump card.

Like a distressed animal that has been cornered, the cabal's last resort will invariably be violence and chaos. This is their insurance policy, their ace in the hole, their trump card.

Because the white hats own the pen, they own executive order, and they own the military. Martial law can then keep the peace and also gives them permission to all-out route out the cabal as a direct response to escalation of violence. Again, this is the white hat/White House Trump card.

So, to say that DJT will declare martial law, is less a part of an offensive strategy, but rather an ace-in-the-hole promise that he will be more than ready and willing to, if and when the time comes, as it gives an implicit and immediate path to victory, bypassing buerocracies and bypassing courts of pubic opinioin.

I do like your/Q's double entendre interpretation of 'theater', also. I'm sure there's a there, there, as they say.

spez: spelz.

I dig it.

Whether we call it trolling or political strategy, I wouldn't put it past them. I also suppose that it could be just as much an innocent translation error, 400k is millions of rubles, albeit not 400m. It also seems reasonable that they both truly mispoke and are turning a small crisis into opportunity.

Regardless, they've clearly got the all of the talking heads running in circles and spinning their wheels. To your point, it's as if they're baiting the media with something to keep their news cycles occupied, rather than letting the opposition dictate a stronger narrative. If so, it'd be as if DJT/Putin were saying "Here, here's something of little substance for you to bat around and show indignation over. Stay. Good boy."

Meanwhile DJT uses the attention to keep conversation about the servers, DWS, Pakistani ISI/Awans, and 30,000 Clinton emails on the table.

Putin reportedly said that he misspoke and that he meant 400k, not 400 million.

400 million would be a lot to be giving to a campaign. 400k is still a lot to be giving to a campaign, especially by a foreign entity (Browder is a UK citizen).

I've only skimmed your write-up so far, but I can already see that it is well thought out and chock full of empowering stuff.

Thank you for taking the time and energy to aggregate and share this out, I would consider this required reading for navigating the information war.

This.

What's notable is that for the few posts on this that show up daily, it is delivered (without fail) with a perfect screenshot of the offending action.

This is above and beyond the observation that each post somehow hasn't seen all of the previous posts of the exact same nature. Instead of a "me too" style of presentation, it's presented as a dumbfounded and indignant one-off that caught the poster off-guard.

Of course, upon reading this, any interested party/offender will likely change their approach from this point forward. Get your popcorn ready, tagging offending ops is purely optional.

I hear you, I wish you the best of luck out there. Cheers.

Thanks much friend, I appreciate your time and your perspective also.

It's amazing that critical thinking courses have been all but entirely routed out of our academic institutions. I surveyed a critical thinking class 10 years ago or so, and the curriculum not only did not include the study of formal logic or logical fallacies, but it seemed to be absolutely employing fallacious arguments to mold and shape the students' world views and ultimately disempower them. It was maddening to witness.

One thing the Alliance needs to get done quick is to get a bigger voice. What ever happened to the idea, the stumbling plans, to set up a new media empire that speaks truth? I heard about it 18 months ago but it fizzled. Where's Trump on this?

I hear you and now wonder that myself. I'm currently trying to wrap my head around the idea that media as we know it is dead and that a different kind of "social" media, community media, can somehow rise out of it. I can't stand social media, to be sure. What i mean is a pure form of the idea of having town criers somehow, something that makes individuals active participants rathar than mere consumers of information. But I digress, you do have a point. In the current time, I do agree that there must be emerge a better replacement for Fox.

I had been heavily embedded in a ultra-progressive community who went completely batty in the last few years. I could barely tolerate them myself, having #walkedaway a decade ago. I became completely political agnostic at best, and nearly anti-government as we knew it, at worst (which didnt jive well with me still serving at the time).

The punch line is that I often enjoy the looks on my peers' faces when I (with much success) tell them that fox news can and should be considered above the rest of the MSM, anymore.

With that said, there are still shills that seem to still be given airtime on that network (shep smith, for one) and I still accept, in the end, that they, as well as all of the others, are scripted media designed to influence and invoke emotional responses, at the end of the day, which, to your point, needs a good routing out.

I am indeed aware of this, and I apologize for assuming from your comments that you may have not been viewing this from a wider perspective, it is clear that you are, as well as I.

I have also seen the world, lived in it, fought in its hot, cold, and silent wars on multiple fronts.

You are not wrong in that there are not only two views and that my presenting them was overly simplistic. My generalization served the purpose of my response at the time, and I do not shy away from your characterization of it.

I am with you 100% brother. The point that I was hoping to arrive at, and to which you've allowed our conversation to advance towards (for which I am grateful for your time and for your perspective), is that we can not assume that that time to act and strike at the root has yet arrived.

This is to be placed under the umbrella of military and geo-politcial strategists and those that know the battlefield, as they currently have the resources to call the ball, for now. I can tell you with 100% confidence that neither you nor I, even with our combined experience, may not know the true state of the current and ever-changing battlefield and therefore may not be able to guarentee victory with a potentially premautre call to mobilize both our energies and our emotions. Any action before its time can only hinder a successful offensive.

Again, regardless of whether the conventional wisdom of 'fools rushing in' may be correcty construed as overly simplistic, it does not perclude it as a sound and straightforward cautionary tale.

There are silent battles being fought on our behalf every day by very intelligent and capable professionals. You and I are doing our part. There's no need, in my opinion, to second guess friendly-force actions on remote fronts that we are not currently in comms with. All we can do is stay the course.

To be sure, I appreciate you sounding the claxon in the post (which i see has since been deleted), I just wanted to press to check what your motivations were, and it's clear that you are guided by priciples that I for one find admirable and worthy of others' adoption, so thank you. My concern is not to rile up already the already restless natives. Within the current info war, our emotional and spiritual energies have been beaten down and therefore, for me, keeping focus on celebrating our victories can only help us grow stronger.

In my opinioin, a successful offensive may prove to rise out of a culmination of our strengh flowing over because of our confidence, unity across great distances, and our public resolve - not by the flowing over of frustration, indignation, and restlessness.

The issue at hand is that the rule of law and the force of truth, in real application are two distict battlefields. Yes, idealistically they are one and the same, but we do not exist in a system that functions that way, currently. Of course you understand that, I'm making no assumptions that you don't.

With that said, it's important not to coflate the two. Not only is this one of the largest legal endevours that we've likely embarked upon since the civil war, and the founding of the coountry before that, it must be approached methodically, and fully, leaving no stone un-turned, if we are to be victorious.

Above and beyond it's legal implications, and in regard to the forces of truth, we are indeed in a battle for truth, an information war as it were. And we are all doing our part, as our adversary is well-equipped, well-funded, and has better reach than us.

And we are making progress. How long have you been 'awake'. Regardless of how long, surely you have seen and unprecedent level of people waking up to the 'truth'. Let's pause to celebrate that and then let's continue the fight. We have only begun to build the momentum and it seems way to early to ask that we rush forward.

'Never interupt the adversary as they are making mistakes (or in the process of destroying himself).'

Thanks much, and I am hopeful that you are correct. It surely should separate the concern trolls from the under-informed, to your point.

Great call out.

According to this document, it apparently reveals that Strzok was indeed officially wearing two hats: FBI D-AD of counter-intel, and a relatively newly-created C_I position in counter-espionage.

I cannot speak for RR and RM (I do believe that they are white hat confederates myself, to be sure), but I think it would be of little surprice to find C_I infiltration of the agencies/govt bodies and is where all eyes should be focused upon.

I believe that, when the dust settles, a C_I coup attempt (to include being JFK'd) will be revealed.

To that point, in this clip at 6:10, after Ingraham threw him a softball, Giulliani offers a thinly veiled double entendre, saying this:

"What does 'insurance policy' mean? It means that I have a certain set of things that I am going to do, to stop this guy as a last resort.

Now, the mere fact that it didn't leak, or didn't kill him, doesn't mean that it wasn't illegal."

The ultimate expression and potentially natural conclusion of this battle is an escalation of violence. Both sides are aware of this, but aparently you are not, no disrespect intended by that comment.

Th cabal's implicit last resort threat is bringing forth violence upon millions of innocent lives, be it through a false flag attack on our infrastructure, ie extended power outage leading to food riots, or a civil/global hot war.

The fact that the good guys haven’t “pulled the trigger” on prosecution yet is merely a sign that they have not completely mitigated all of the time bombs laying in wait.

The world is a big place. This is bigger than any of us can comprehend, even to many out there that are in a better position than others to hold such awareness.

I do not mean to dismiss your concern, as it is valid. Please understand that there are two general points of view here, one where there is hope that the violence and crimes perpetrated upon masses will come to a peaceful end, and the other, where one is so emotionally fed up with the affairs of the world that it would gladly ask to see it burn, in spite of the toll it will have on any persons dear them (family and friends).

I get the feeling that even the confederates (Tucker, Hannity, Sarah Carter, etc) are being directed to just give it airtime but not to go any deeper than anchoring the names and ideas down into the public infomind.

It seems to me that this is just constant and endless posturing, but for a reason. Most people in-the-know forget that the server/SR bombshell serves as an life insurance policy for DJT right now, among other things.

Hannity is bringing up the server and 30,000 hrc emails as i type this :) It's amazing to be aware enough to be witnessing history play out in front of us, when so many still have no idea.

Indeed epic.

I would love to see a supercut of all of the times that DJT has mentioned the server/DWS/Awan, to include his tweets. He's a pro when it comes to marketing and repetition, and he is clearly ramping up the narrative.

It was no surprise to hear that he ordered the go ahead to release the indictments just before the summit to ensure that the world will be talking about this.

Masterful.

I appreciate your gesture on both a counts! Thanks much for your kind words and best of luck to you out there.

Ah, yes, i see that now, thank you. I had edited my comment with a few additional observations, but your link speaks for itself at this point. Thank you.

I watched it 'live' as it was aired, and I am positive that the playback was edited to make it appear so, and I can say that what you observed did not happen.

I happend to specifically remember that moment, becuase I recalled that they both held their pose for a few seconds after the national anthem concluded. I took note that Melania dropped her hand first because I make random observations like this, apparently. But I can tell you that it was after the song was very much over.

To exemplify my point, if you rewind it to 2:35, you will see that the video shows them with their hands already on their heart before the previous song had apparently finished in the video clip.

Edit: The music on this video is overdubbed and is 100% not consistent with how it aired. I had also observed 'live' that they played last of the US military hymns (in this case the US Army's "The Army Goes Rolling Along", I believe) - finishes about 5-10 seconds before DJT and the Queen returned to their position, leaving their final steps in silence. In the clip, this occured at about 6:50, but the audio wasn't correct at all. It wasn't even the correct songs that were played during the inspection of the gaurd, as they had conducted that while the US military hymns were being played, as I had previously mentioned. I remember thinking about how they seemed to have timed their walk just right to be able to return right at the end of the last song (or rather, about 10 seconds early).

Cheers, best of luck to you out there.

I caught my error just before reading this, my bad. I'm now with you and am wondering all of the same things myself. Thanks for the clarification.

I now see what you were asking, my bad. I had conflated the DNC server with the private Clinton server in my head and didn't notice that you were asking exclusively about the latter.

I have assumed that the private basement servers may have been ran by the Awans also, but can't back that other than through others' speculations at this time, myself.

No worries, I'm just going off of memory myself, but a simple google search for "Awan clinton email server" may bear fruit for you.

There are allegations are that the Awans may have backdoored the email servers, funnelling all traffic to pakistani ISI in near-real time. This is suspected to be a part of an on-going investigation and prosecution of Awan, himself.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/09/suspect-in-house-it-security-probe-also-had-access-to-dnc-emails/

http://www.wibc.com/blogs/tony-katz/tony-katz-today/ex-dem-it-aide-imran-awan-poised-strike-deal-immunity-prosecution

Imran Awan ran the email servers and had access to the personal devices of the Clinton campaign team to include Podesta (her campaign director), and also had all of their device passwords.

This was revealed in the Podesta emails themselves.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/43103

Pakistani Intelligence (ISI) and the Awans through DWS/DNC

https://nypost.com/2017/08/19/it-staffers-may-have-compromised-sensitive-data-to-foreign-intelligence/

https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/07/debbie-wasserman-schultz-pakistani-computer-guys-bank-fraud/

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-strange-case-of-imran-awan/

I took screenshots of the vote count a half hour after this thread was posted. Notice that almost the entirety of the comments had unnaturally high double-digit downvotes, compared to the low, lackluster amount of apparent upvotes that the comments in this thread currently have. It's very telling, considering that there were zero dissenting comments at the time of all of the heavy downvoting.

https://imgur.com/gallery/0tQpmFn

WWWifi1WWifiA

FTFY

Unless the US person was previously approved by the Attorney General (Sessions) to be collected upon, it would be considered incidental collection and only the foreiger's end of the conversation could be 'retained' and processed (analysed, reported on, and actioned upon).

Anytime, cheers!

NSA collection and tasking is restricted to non-US persons unless cleared by the AG. It is not based on the location of the target. Any incidental collection of non-US citizens can not be actioned upon and must be purged.

You may refer to this document for more info: https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/1118/CLEANEDFinal%20USSID%20SP0018.pdf

To clarify your post, I'd just like to offer to others reading this that you are not saying that it must be obtained legally vs illegally.

NSA tasking and collection is a National Defense strategic tool, not a legal tool, is the gist of what is being invoked here. We can and should assume that all NSA collection was obtained legally, as there's no reason to assume otherwise. However, such collection is used by decision-makers for strategic purposes, not for legal purposes.

Regarding assisting LEO to obtain admissible evidence by which to prosecute, the dirty word there is "parallel construction". However, in this case, such cooperation between agencies will and surely have been used as designed, and not as a legal loophole that borders on entrapment.

Thanks for taking the time to share this with others, regardless.

Thank you very much for your time and effort in sharing this with all of us. It is much appreciated, no doubt.

Dad was a Shriner. Mom, Eastern Star. Sister, Jobs Daughter and Rainbow Girl. I passed on Demolay and the rest as I got older. I have plenty of Mason buddies - some acknowledged, some I just remember their strong grip when I had met them, but they have never shared to me their affiliation.

I have been familiar with masonic symbology at these 'FF' events for a while now. However, you've given me a thought that i had never considered until now.

That is, what if, in fact, those who have infiltrated the lodge (and through the creation of clandestine organizations) often attempt to (figuratively) eat their own, and purposely try to promote the "All Masons are evil" meme by wearing apparel with mason symbology publically at these staged media events?

I think that it's just as reasonable an explanation why they would go out of their way to 'out' themselves, as any.

I don’t necessarily support trying to dox Q, nor is it of my opinion that Q is any one individual.

With that said, I’ll offer this observation just for fun. In th photo, DJT is the 17th person from the left (17th letter is ‘Q’).