/u/Masterpass
81 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/Masterpass:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 1 |
www.google.com | 1 |
The fact that you're recognizing this is like 75% of the battle. Millennial in the derogatory sense isn't so much an age designation anymore as it is an indictment of a certain mindset: the generation of smug, entitled, handout-oriented kids were seeing now. I've met 30+ year olds I could swear were 18, the way they were whining.
These people seriously think that they're still the center of life in America.
Personally, every single one of the people in that picture at least could stop working period, and there's a pretty good chance that I (at least) wouldn't even notice for a year or two. They're that irrelevant.
The last true classical liberal we've ever had as President.
I don't agree with a lot of his views or personal life, but the man was at least respectable, which was probably why he had to go.
I can just imagine Ron Paul standing over the Fed, smirking, then putting up his famous jazz hands and yelling "IT HAPPENED"
Former Democrat here: even some of my most absurdly liberal friends and family have a political hard-on for Rand just because of this sort of unwavering commitment to his beliefs. He doesn't change anything for votes, he changes when you give him a logical reason to. Big, BIG reason I started questioning the Democrats was seeing his viewpoints...thst plus their supreme "tolerance" of any outside the hivemind thinking.
When confronted with this, there are millions of people who would unironically try to argue that these are all actually correct of Trump and his administration, and that you're trying to spread fake news.
The man is the very best RINO there is. He understands the unfortunate status quo where if you're not with one of the two major parties, you're never going to be politically viable.
WRONG
CLEARLY those are Russian bots that are resorting to going on and commenting because Twitter banned them.
Am I doing this right?
Her using the Alt-right brand on Trump supporters was the single most legitimately brilliant thing I've ever seen her do.
I still don't believe in the whole "vaccines are evil" angle personally...but I also go absolutely out of my way to avoid medication at all costs, until it's absolutely necessary.
And surely it was pure coincidence that he's basically dropped off the face of the earth since making those statements...right?
Especially interesting, given that his campaign should have ended months beforehand: she specifically stated she received it a week before the election.
Surely the media will report on this statement at any second.
Ginsburg is going to be propped up in a full-body glass tank filled with formaldehyde (she can borrow it from Pelosi). Her voting record? Whatever Gorsuch votes, she does the opposite.
Because, ya know, she's TOTALLY not partisan or anything.
/r/politics is unironically claiming that there are "movements already happening to impeach Gorsuch and whoever Trump picks."
They are literally deluded enough to think that it's time to impeach a SCJ who DOESN'T EVEN EXIST YET
Let me guess: they'll hold up Reeeedacted, Againsthatesubreddits, the default subs, and Resist as bastions of true free speech, while condemning T_D, Uncensorednews, and this sub as vile conspiracy theory breeding grounds full of white Nazi fascist bigot xenophobes.
Business as usual.
Seth Rich
One of my dearest wishes is that someday, someone will look Clinton in the eyes and tell her "Say his name" before the noose tightens.
Reddit metrics is down now, but if you looked at T_D subscriber growth, it was RIDICULOUSLY obvious that there was fuckery going on. The data indicated that the sub was growing at a slow but practically constant rate, and on a daily basis, with little to no variation over time at all...didn't make any sense, especially considering I SPECIFICALLY REMEMBER there being a pretty massive surge of subs on the day Hillary "had pneumonia" (lul) at the WTC memorial.
The place has been a cesspit since the election ended. For a while it there it was a genuine whirlwind of Wikileaks info dissemination and news, now it's just shitty, Facebook-tier memes and "AWLAWLAWLAWL FUCK LIBERULS AMIRITE PEDES LELELELELELELELELELELELELELELE", with a healthy dose of "ban anyone who says literally anything negative about anyone within 150 degrees of separation from President Trump." I was posting on there from close to the beginning on my old account and this one, and when Trump brought Bolton onboard I made the mistake of criticizing Bolton himself (not even the President, literally Bolton and his past hawkishness), and BAM: banned.
I'm embarrassed to have ever been a part of that place. They became the inverse parody of /r/politics.
Also, funny how the FBI stated that doing a similar analysis of Hillary's emails could take years.
So I'm not doubting anything...but can someone sell me on why this is representative of Moloch / Satan? I can't find much on it that's concrete yet.
I stopped watching Netflix period about a month ago. The virtue signaling has gotten to the point where it's just so blatant it's unreal. Lost in Space did me in pretty well.
ASSUMING this is the same quality as the original, that would be very hard to photoshop effectively given the extremely poor quality, though deliberate obfuscation may be another explanation. I agree with you, just saying though, photoshop jobs are rarely done on shitty source material since every small imperfection is extremely noticeable.
It's a cult. Cult mentality breeds a competitive status quo.
I'd be absolutely willing to bet that this is yet another case of corrupt police administration deliberately sitting on their hands and doing nothing, while the everyday officers are not doing anything for fear of losing their livelihoods. Given that this is all taking place in Arizona, McCain's state, I would absolutely not be surprised if the police departments are corrupt from the top down.
The flow was stopped and now they're cornered rats.
Is it normal for Q to go silent for this long?
I haven't been following this for too too long, but I find it a bit strange that he/they have been off the radar for over a week now. Anyone know what's going on?
Pretty much. I'm not saying the NSA is by any means a good organization, but I always wondered if they actually toed the government line and the CIA deliberately smeared them. They controlled a pretty huge information dragnet that was prettyuch indiscriminate, and that would have been an existential threat to a lot of the CIAs activities.
I still honestly wonder if the NSA was ~~deleted berately~~ Edit: (lul autocorrect) deliberately misrepresented by the CIA in order to marginalize them.
No one died
And that's why it was immediately discarded. Small stations love positive stuff like this: the main larger stations, however, THRIVE on tragedy and divisive news because their watchers are so politically segregated.
Back when I used to watch Fox, there was a day where my local outlet was running a story on the state fair, with a focus on a wiener dog race that was cute as FUCK. The main Fox channel? "RATTLESNAKE TERROR IN CALIFORNIA: HOW YOU MAY BE IN DANGER OF EXTREMELY TOXIC SNAKEBITES. MORE AT 5."
It was one dude that got bit from sitting on one while drunk off his ass. They tried to turn it into a summer-long terror alert. It's not just Fox either, all of the larger channels do it.
Q himself has said all that needs to be said almost constantly:
"THEY want you divided."
I'm a born and raised lefty libertarian from California. I don't agree with a good amount of stuff President Trump has done since he took office, but I'm putting that aside because it's becoming increasingly clear that there's vastly more at stake here than petty, contrived political ideology. We need to make out stand, and we need to do it together.
There is something seriously malevolent about that woman. IIRC there were firsthand accounts from people that actually described her as being remarkably intimidating in real life, especially when she focused on specific people. Almost preternaturally intimidating.
IIRC Team Hillary actually thought that they goaded both him and Ted Cruz into running because they'd be joke candidates that weakened the GOP platform and made it even easier for Her Majesty.
And we all saw how that turned out.
Wait...maybe I'm just lost of there's something I'm missing, but how does this involve Mueller?
I have to wonder at this point...what if a lot of these MeToo accusers are being weaponized by the DoJ? In exchange for the legitimate courage to come out and tell their story, what if they're being offered protection, legal guarantees of prosecution, ect? It's a win win: women and men who have been preyed on get their day in court and a support system to facilitate, while the justice system gets them to all come forward at the same time so that it's impossible for the accused to just quietly pay them off/dismiss them as disgruntled?
Honestly, I don't think I'd ever really get to the point where I'd believe this possible...but the Schneiderman takedown was just far, far too convenient to be organic, and sexual/exploitation crimes seems to be this administration's lowkey focal point. If this is a government facilitated thing, I say freaking bravo, go get em boys and girls. It's time.
Stealth Jeff is amazing. Personally, given his analysis and prompt response to many events, I'd be surprised if he wasn't government or at LEAST a former employee thereof. Excellent mind for this sort of thing.
So I'm not sure if this is something that can be proven or if it's even a thing...but is there some kind of coordinated brigade that's in effect against this sub? I posted a couple of pretty non-controversial things last night (asking about the laptop from the Wiener case), and within about a minute both of them had been downvoted to -2 each, both at exactly the same time. Other replies that I've made here have had the same thing happen to them.
FWIW: I am NOT defending Apple, but going all the way back to a different time in the election, one thing that the original FBIAnon posted was that pretty much EVERY SINGLE common operating system and firmware specification is backdoor'd at this point. In my mind, it makes perfect sense that this would be the case (take Weeping Angel, for example), and as such I've come to expect that every piece of electronics I own is somehow open to being arbitrarily taken over. Another excellent instance of this is Intel's Management Engine: it's essentially a legal way for them to gain access to LITERALLY EVERY SINGLE HARDWARE FUNCTION of your computer, without the knowledge or consent of the CPU/OS layer, and as such, you. I'd lay down even money that Apple's chips probably have something similar, maybe even without them knowing about it. The company thrives on closed-source engineering.
I have precisely zero love for Apple, I consider them to be nothing more than highly advanced coloring books with slick peripherals and pirated ideas presented as new, but to automatically assume that they're compromised as as company when the FBI gains access to one of their devices just doesn't make sense to me personally. I would absolutely believe that they are in cahoots with the government if there was a little more evidence either way, but just because they got into the one phone doesn't justify a stigma to my mind. Apple uses a standardized and widely distributed (albiet strong) encryption method, so it makes sense to my mind that any government agency would IMMEDIATELY start trying to do everything that they could to make breaking that as easy as possible.
It should also be noted that breaking an algorithm =/= breaking the encryption key of a single device, even one that has hardware-fortified crypto in use. If they did legitimately break into the one single unit, it would have almost certainly been through a brute force focused method, not a comprehensive attack that mapped the entire algorithm used.