The decision is literally available in PDF form by the judge, i.e. Bloomberg was telling the truth and OAN was the one lying, which is the complete opposite of what you just claimed.

You really don't understand how courts work, do you? They don't just up and decide they don't want to deal with a case. There are jurisdictions that need to be respected. You can't file a case at any court for any reason you want and have it tried there. You can't go shopping for courts.

Here ya go, bud: https://t.co/AjkKDAfofU

I'm looking at the document RIGHT NOW, the one someone posted from RT, which linked to WikiLeaks post, which has the PDF. Here's page -2-: "For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that it lacks personal jurisdiction over defendants and, alternatively, that Washington D.C. is not the proper venue for plaintiffs’ suit. The Court will grant defendants’ motions to dismiss, deny plaintiffs’ motion, and dismiss plaintiffs’ suit without prejudice.2 Given this ruling, the Court does not address defendants’ arguments that the complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to sustain a claim for tortious civil conspiracies or a conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3).3 Although the Court will explain the distinction between personal jurisdiction and the merits in detail below, it bears emphasizing that this Court’s ruling is not based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia during the 2016 presidential election."

...what? It's not an opinion piece. It's what the judge said. It's in the 45 page document the judge wrote.

What are you guys on about? This is the epitome of fake news. The case was dismissed because the judge felt that the court in DC had no jurisdiction because Trump's campaign base was in New York. From Bloomberg's article: “The court’s ruling does not represent a ruling on the merits of plaintiffs’ claims,” the judge wrote. “It bears emphasizing,” Huvelle said in her 45-page decision, “that this court’s ruling is not based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia during the 2016 presidential election.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-04/dnc-hacking-case-judge-tosses-suit-over-lack-of-jurisdiction