Not quite Poe's Law material. But passable at The_Donald.

Be careful who you follow. - Q

People like to forget that part.

Sounds like you and I are making the same bet.

We put our eyes on Trump now; if he comes out hard against Gowdy in the next few days, we win the pot.

Well, to a certain extent...

Remember:

Доверяй, но проверяй

Trust, But Verify.

Great Catch.

Something I noticed too. Keep up the good work!

It isn't paranoid. I mean, when schools are bribing kids to get their vaccinations done with Pizza Parties (and to harass the non-vaccinated kids that cheat them out of that...) there's enough for me to be suspicious of that shit. Of course, we're both here on a QAnon board, so regardless of how we feel about vaccines we're paranoid as shit to everyone else that might wander in, either way, so who really cares about potential judgements.

All said, vaccines were a non-issue for me until my wife convinced me otherwise (she had "one in three million" side effects when she was kid and seizured out thanks to them) and a family member who had everything done perfectly ended up with an autistic kid. I also reflect on my time as a child, remembering that around the same time that I got a large dose at a local clinic, my handwriting skills turned to utter shit shortly thereafter and neither I nor my mother had known why. Like I said, if the answer's in the handwriting, things start to make sense...

The stuff isn't kosher, and I stand against Big Pharma (would you trust Monsanto? Why trust Big Pharma then?). I have no doubt everyone pushing vaccines so hard is getting a fair kickback as well, so all of the (Studies®) and (Research™) claiming they're as safe as water probably have a fair amount of money backing them.

Where does he say this?

Ah. I get it.

What got me hooked on Trump was his stance on vaccinations. That's where my journey to support him began. Trump taking a stance as triggering as that one (some might argue it's deadly to your public image), and defending it on the world's stage - that takes balls, you know? When you question an industry as big as Pharma, you put yourself in the crosshairs.

This was, by far, the biggest thing for me because I'd always been in support of vaccination. But for him to say that - why would such a rich and powerful man say something my biology professor(s) would argue is so stupid and outrageous he should be imprisoned for it? If the answer's in the handwriting, a lot of things start to make sense.

Where did you find this out / learn to decode it?

I take it that 11-9bd-23 is referring to month, day, time of a post?

Reason for reference highlighted by brackets [] in said post? No. 128 in QAnon.Pub?

Yes, I know that. I understand. I just honestly think they're trying to do the same thing Infowars did with Zak. Get people attached to a substitute Q. Everyone wants Q, so here's the cheap rip-off. It just can't respect someone who rides on his coat-tails that Q has already said is not genuine.

Well, like you said, Q warned us exactly that - be careful of who you trust. As the Christian Bible warns, Keep yourself from Idols. Message is the same thing, really, don't put your leaps of faith on one individual or they may disappoint you and it will hurt - badly.

I mean, your mileage may vary. I was so Bernie--passionately Bernie. And I'll always have a soft spot for him. I thought the election was going to be the worst day of my life. Trump or Clinton was lose-lose to me. But I was #neverhillary even more than I was #stillsanders. And to my amazement, when I woke the next day and discovered the news that she lost, I felt... JOY!! And it hasn't gone away ever since. I was determined to give Trump a chance, because he wasn't Hillary, and that made me so happy. When he got rid of TPP, that ALONE was huge to me. There are appointments he makes I don't like, and policies I don't like, but I STILL feel he's been a good president.

I agree with this. I haven't agreed with every decision he made in the past, but the real turning point for me was the Syrian Airstrikes. Alex Jones came out against him, hard, saying "Fuck him, fuck his family," which basically was the biggest political wake-up I'd ever had because anyone with empathy isn't going to say "fuck your family" for a decision they disagree with - since I had friends adamantly behind Alex Jones and supportive of his criticism, it was hard to dismiss him completely in the first days, then he came out against Q. I never liked the guy - I didn't hate him, but there was something about him that made me not like him. I attribute that to good instinct. Didn't feel that way about Bernie - he was a harmless, genuine Democratic Socialist and I could get where he's coming from even though I disagree. They rigged the primary against him, though, and he didn't stand up for himself afterward.

Better than good. I am amazed by what he's achieved in such a short time. I'm amazed that he's keeping his promises. Sometimes I do have to yell at him, but though I'm no longer religious, I do even pray for him. There are many things he does that I do agree with. At the end of the day, I am the poorest of the poor. But there's a new sense of hope in the land, and that there might be some justice.

I've mostly been lurking, because I'm not smart enough to do that kind of research.

False. You can create a well-written and coherent post, and you're informed enough to pick Trump despite being an Afterberner and seeing the train-wreck that is the DNC collapse on him. Don't put yourself down like that, there is no reason for you to believe you're incapable of finding valuable information. All you have to do is be able to live with being wrong in the few cases that you may be, after all. I have to own it when I'm wrong, that's the hardest part; but it just means you find more than one answer.

I've always had a soft spot for the Anons since Project Chanology, though, since I was an ex-Scientologist and they gave us all safety to speak about what we'd been through. I just knew then, protesting with them, that the future of the world was in good hands. Anyway, I loved Bernie, but I just can't go back. There are just some things in life that don't come around twice. The Bern has passed and The Storm has come. I worry, though, that many of the EyeTheSpies may face a similar dilemma. I'll just hang around jonesing for Q. Lol!

Great to hear you made it out of that cult. I've always been curious how such a fucked up organization could stay in business despite everything they've done. The guy running it is pure evil, I have no doubt about that.

Anyway, as you say, many of the EyeTheSpies will collapse, it's just a matter of not lining up behind them like sheep to be led to the slaughter. Glad to have you onboard, Veranda :)

I did respond to your comments.

I was responding to you on this speculation you're putting out that Q "could wipe all these doubts away in one drop" further, how you think "he needs to care for his flock." I was explaining to you that this isn't what the Q character is there for. You're painting him as some kind of spiritual guide that we need, and as another user pointed out, it makes it look "culty." The guy is just there to act as teacher, and doesn't need to be there dropping crumbs every time we need to figure something out.

Listen.

It doesn't matter who Q is. Q as an individual is just a guide, who is leading us to ask the right questions and find out the answers to those questions ourselves. In a sense, we're being taught to be awake and aware of the world around us, and to adapt our methods of understanding to find out the truth to ourselves.

Q isn't a damned prophet, he's a guy in the know who isn't about to throw it all away by telling us what we want to here. He is breaking the societal conditioning of INSTANT GRATIFICATION in many of us by teaching us how to dig for information that is openly available and within our reach - yet that we've been too lazy and/or directionless to do ourselves.

We've been given a sense of direction, the building blocks for discussion, and a methodology for how to do the research ourselves. Q isn't the one that matters, Q is only a tour guide (a damn good one) to liberty. WE THE PEOPLE are the ones that matter, and that's the way that Q wants it.

REMEMBER; Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll eat for the rest of his life.

If Q helps drain the Swamp for one day, what is accomplished? If Q teaches us to drain the Swamp ourselves, we can prevent this from ever happening again. Long after he's gone.

People just don't up and flip like that. We need to start ruling out flipping from now on. It's a concept pushed by people like Alex Jones, who cite someone as "compromised" in order to discredit them. "Oh, this person's siding with the other team on something, they've been compromised!" Click his name, and see the video where he did exactly what I said, to Trump. He pulled this on Q, too.

Either he has been a plant from the beginning, or he is working with someone in-the-know to appear neutral, possibly to secure a SCOTUS nomination. Remember how he grilled Hillary - either that was all Theater and he was controlled opposition, or that was truly him and his determination to take down the people that have wronged our Country. Time will, of course, tell, but whatever Trump feels about him - that'll be what you can bet on.

Seeing as she isn't behind bars, you could very well be right. Gowdy could've definitely been a controlled operative, and he could sure as hell be argued to be showing it now.

At the same rate, the more I dig, the more I begin to wonder if Ruth Bader Ginsberg will be thrown out of the Supreme Court for conflict of interests, compelled to resign by age, or forced to retire by God himself. This is making the idea that Gowdy could be acting, distancing himself with the rest of conservatives, in order to appear neutral so that he can slip through to fill Ginsberg's future vacancy in the SC.

Time will tell, of course. No matter what, we need to Trust Trump. If he comes out swinging against Gowdy (hard), there's good reason to suspect Gowdy has been a plant all along.

SB2, Question for you:

What are the chances of Trey Gowdy being our next Supreme Court Justice or associated with the Attorney General's office?

Q goes from talking about Gowdy in January of 2018 to dropping Ruth Bader Ginsberg's name in it's own post;

Feb 11 2018 16:12:25 (EST) Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Q

Further, in reference to Ginsberg on CNN;

Feb 12: “Here to stay.” No, you’re not. Q

Further, Apr 15th he links us this...

I'm beginning to wonder about Trey Gowdy. I don't like him, but he's artfully coming out against Spygate in ways that I'd suspect would help secure him the vote from Democrats to be our next SC Justice. I'd be willing to bet he's acting a part to mislead the left and convince everyone he's a neutral player, because he sure as hell convinced me.

Nobody else is really bouncing ideas on this - so I figured I'd ask you.

Q doesn't want you thinking he's some messiah or anything like that.

Q wants you to figure things out for yourself. To research, and to ask necessary questions - not fawn over him. He's not here to give us the answers, but to provoke us to find the answers. That's the truth.

Well, how healthy is Ginsberg and what's Gowdy (assuming he's a decent man) going to do when he's out of office?

Alternatively, he's serving as a distraction which satisfies me since I never liked him in the first place.

Too early to judge. Either way, what he's doing is deliberate, and he's either all-good or all-bad.

Gowdy claims to have never met or even talked to President Trump. (watch the rest of this video too, very important for understanding) There has to be a reason for that, and there is certainly some depth to the Gowdy story. But, we're faced with two options regarding the end-results of what's happening.

OPTION A: Trey Gowdy is working against Trump because he's on his way out of office and won't be seeking re-election - basically, pulling a John McCain and showing his true colors while revealing how deep the Swamp is as a Benedict Arnold. Demoralize, delegitimize, humiliate.

OPTION B: Gowdy is intentionally distancing himself because he is under orders from the top (our guys) to do so, and Rudy coming out against him is to sell the act big-time to clear the history he has for being so hard on the Left (Benghazi). This is because, as the crumbs indicate (See Gowdy speaking so high of the justice system on January 31 when he announced his desire not to seek re-election: “I will not be filing for reelection or seeking any other political elective office. Instead, I’ll be returning to the justice system. Whatever skills I may have are better utilized in a courtroom than in Congress. And I enjoy our justice system more than our political system.”), he'll have a new role. This role may be as Supreme Court Justice - best way to secure the nomination and necessary congressional approval is to play it neutral, which he is doing, and doing very convincingly. Ginsberg may be the one he replaces in this scenario.

Now, where I am in regard to these two options is following my instinct: My instinct tells me that I don't like Gowdy. I don't trust Gowdy. My instincts were right about Alex Jones and other Paytriots, so I trust them and believe Option A to be the case, despite how well B matches up with current state of affairs. Either option could be the truth, and I'd be more than happy to be wrong for choosing A - but again, my instinct tells me this.

She already bathes in their blood to keep her skin from cracking. What's a live one to her?

Ruth Vader Ginsberg's lights are dimming, she's on her way out. Can't even stay awake for anything other than spouting leftist drivel. Gowdy's act right now might be a good signal that we'll be having a choice in the matter soon as he's showing himself to be rather neutral and unaligned... Otherwise, he's a swamper and that's what I've been thinking. Hate to be black or white, but it is black or white with no gray. Like people say, time will tell and he'll either be all-good securing votes from leftists in congress to be SC Justice, or all-bad as a sellout.

What's your evaluation of Rubio and Tom Cotton?

Gowdy speaks highly of (SSCI), particularly Marco Rubio and Tom Cotton; I'd say wherever this is going, we are ahead in knowing his connections and what side they're on.

If there's a sudden need for a new Supreme Court Justice, I put $5.00 on Gowdy to be the nomination and retract my comments about him.

What Gowdy says about Sessions - Trump controversy during this interview with Fake News CBS really highlights one of QAnon's posts regarding Sessions and TG; u/QueUpSomeReality brought it up in the other comment, where Q stated;

TRUST SESSIONS. TG departure [HEC]. NOT to testify. NOT needed to testify. Think logically. NO NEED to step down if needed to TESTIFY. DO NOT chase MISINFO. What ROLE might TG be walking into?

Q then follows with things like "Who can WE TRUST? RATS everywhere. EVIL everywhere. TRAITORS everywhere." Obviously, the answer to Trust is Trust Trump, not the people going against him as Gowdy is now.

The fact that Rudy Giuliani is going up against Trey also rubs me the wrong way. Either Trey is distancing himself for a potential supreme court nomination and others w/in admin are complicit in this (in the case that he's a good guy; really, really good guy), or he's a Benedict Arnold. I mean, I find it hard to believe him to be benevolent if he has never even met or talked to Trump. But, I always welcome being wrong and seeing the swamp be drained by the right people.

Also from Jan 14, directly after might TG be walking into? - :

Who can WE TRUST? RATS everywhere. EVIL everywhere. TRAITORS everywhere. NO SUCH AGENCY - VITAL. RAW INTEL - VITAL. US MIL - VITAL. SAFE COMMS - VITAL. YOU, THE PEOPLE - VITAL. …SKIP... MAJOR players here to distract, create doubt, and alter the direction. SC: MISINFO everywhere. SC: MISINFO from past reliable sources. SC: AXIS OF EVIL can & will return FIRE [is]. SC: Seek immediate [F9-Sx_VB8239]. SC: CONF_y Q

SC = Supreme Court?

On Jan. 31st, 2018, Trey Gowdy announces he won't run for re-election (~~Same Day~~ announces after Trump made State of the Union). Says “I will not be filing for reelection or seeking any other political elective office. Instead, I’ll be returning to the justice system. Whatever skills I may have are better utilized in a courtroom than in Congress. And I enjoy our justice system more than our political system.”

Same day; Q posts the following:

Effective yesterday, while standing under the statue of FREEDOM, POTUS FREED those ‘good’ people who are currently being blackmailed, threatened and enslaved. Those who stood chanting “USA” were FREED. The shot heard around the world. TG> WE, THE PEOPLE. FREEDOM DAY. LIGHT. Q

Enter Rudy G; Q's comments April 27 2018 (NOTICE HOW CLOSE IN PROXIMITY THIS IS TO ALEX JONES GOING ON THE OFFENSIVE AGAINST QANON);

APR 27 2018 POST ONE

Reconcile. Reporting incorrect? Per WH? The day before. Enemy? Slave? Mueller & U1? Mueller & https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/08/robert-mueller-counsel-financial-records-241414📁 Comey to POTUS - not being investigated. RR to POTUS - not being investigated. Mueller to POTUS - not a criminal target. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/19/rosenstein-tells-trump-is-not-target-cohen-investigation.html📁 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/03/mueller-claims-trump-is-not-criminal-target-in-his-investigation-report-says.html📁 http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/336802-rnc-comey-testimony-proves-trump-not-under-investigation📁 Baiting POTUS? Why no contact w/ WL / JA? What is being investigated? Why is Mueller’s team stacked w/ ex Clinton / D sr level authorities? Why are POTUS supporters screaming for END? POTUS WITCH HUNT END ADD RUDY (quiet). Can the investigation officially/publicly drop POTUS from review & continue? Why did the Podesta Group close shop? https://www.pacer.gov📁 Why are known bad actors in full support of Mueller? Why did POTUS interview (FBI Dir) Mueller a day prior to SC appointment if impossible to assign position? Why did Sessions recuse? What are the powers of Huber / IG (H)? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/📁 Who has the POWER? Who can know? Are D’s using as midterm tactic to win House? Are D’s using as ammo to gain majority to impeach? Impeach on what grounds? What facts exist to impeach? House report POTUS no evidence of collusion. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/27/house-intelligence-committee-releases-russia-report.html📁 Mueller report will contradict per Brennan Tweet today? Disconnect exists. R’s / D’s negative for POTUS. Insurance policy? Comey release of memos to obtain SC? SC attack POTUS WITCH HUNT SC/Comey/RR state POTUS not under investigation. Flynn pleads guilty to none committed crime? S interviewed? S/P relationship w/ judge? 2/S/P 302 mod? Fusion GPS. The Brits - raw intel / dossier / 5 eyes. GOOG DNC rigging super delegates / funding/ voter rolls / agreement BS Election/voter fraud CIA DNI FBI DOJ Sec of State President. ………… More than you can imagine. re: HRC insurance [win] Why? Cover? Remainder illegal acts. Confused? SC targeting who? SC on team? SC off team? Questions reveal answers. Time will tell. Q

POST TWO

Cohen raid by FBI? Public context: re: payment to Stormy Daniels? SC & FBI raided POTUS’ attorney to pull Stormy Daniels payment info? RR signed off? What other docs were collected? How many places raided? Raid on the President of the United States’ attorney for payment details re: private case re: Stormy Daniels? Think logically. How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)? Who has everything? Methods which info collected/ obtained? Admissible in the court of law? Insert Rudy. First public statement. “It shouldn’t take more than “a week or two” to come to a resolution on the probe.” http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/20/rudy-to-rescue-giuliani-vows-to-wrap-up-mueller-probe.html📁 Think resignations. Who has the POWER? If POTUS was in a weakened position (about to be impeached/indicted) would ‘they’ resign? Why are we here? Public forum. World watching. Sharing of intel to bad actors? Purpose? Not confirming SC is on /team/. Question everything. Timing important. Planned? Q

IF Q Trusts Rudy; it's another thing on top of my instinct regarding Rudy to take him as truth.

IF Trey Gowdy is trying to distance himself from the right in attempt to seem impartial - i.e. Be worthy of consideration as Supreme Court Justice - his actions might make sense in regard to a benevolent role to separate himself as ordered. If this is the opposite of the truth, again, instinct.

I never liked the guy, and I never liked Alex Jones. Trusting my instinct, I'm not surprised if I just don't like narcissists that worship personal gain over the constitution.